Do productivity improvements move us along the Environmental Kuznets Curve?

Karen Turner, Nick Hanley, Janine De Fence

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis focuses on the argument that rising prosperity will eventually be accompanied by falling pollution levels as a result of one or more of three factors: (1) structural change in the economy; (2) demand for environmental quality increasing at a more-than-proportional rate; (3) technological progress. Here, we focus on the third of these. In particular, energy efficiency is commonly regarded as a key element of climate policy in terms of achieving reductions in economy-wide CO2 emissions over time. However, a growing literature suggests that improvements in energy efficiency will lead to rebound (or backfire) effects that partially (or wholly) offset energy savings from efficiency improvements. Where efficiency improvements are aimed at the production side of the economy, the net impact of increased efficiency in any input to production will depend on the combination and relative strength of substitution, output/competitiveness, composition and income effects that occur in response to changes in effective and actual factor prices, as well as on the structure of the economy in question, including which sectors are targeted with the efficiency improvement. In this paper we consider whether increasing labour productivity will have a more beneficial, or more predictable, impact on CO2/GDP ratios than improvements in energy efficiency. We do this by using CGE models of the Scottish regional and UK national economies to analyse the impacts of a simple 5% exogenous (and costless) increase in energy or labour augmenting technological progress.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationGlasgow, UK
Number of pages52
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Environmental Kuznets curve
Productivity improvement
Energy efficiency
Technological progress
Prosperity
Labor
Co2
National economy
Competitiveness
Pollution
Factor prices
Environmental quality
Structural change
Factors
Rebound
Climate policy
CGE model
Composition effect
Substitution
Labour productivity

Keywords

  • computable general equilibrium models
  • technical progress
  • energy efficiency
  • labour productivity
  • environmental kuznets curve

Cite this

@techreport{7c0b9a6b194c4f58bc6dd68a27abad6a,
title = "Do productivity improvements move us along the Environmental Kuznets Curve?",
abstract = "The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis focuses on the argument that rising prosperity will eventually be accompanied by falling pollution levels as a result of one or more of three factors: (1) structural change in the economy; (2) demand for environmental quality increasing at a more-than-proportional rate; (3) technological progress. Here, we focus on the third of these. In particular, energy efficiency is commonly regarded as a key element of climate policy in terms of achieving reductions in economy-wide CO2 emissions over time. However, a growing literature suggests that improvements in energy efficiency will lead to rebound (or backfire) effects that partially (or wholly) offset energy savings from efficiency improvements. Where efficiency improvements are aimed at the production side of the economy, the net impact of increased efficiency in any input to production will depend on the combination and relative strength of substitution, output/competitiveness, composition and income effects that occur in response to changes in effective and actual factor prices, as well as on the structure of the economy in question, including which sectors are targeted with the efficiency improvement. In this paper we consider whether increasing labour productivity will have a more beneficial, or more predictable, impact on CO2/GDP ratios than improvements in energy efficiency. We do this by using CGE models of the Scottish regional and UK national economies to analyse the impacts of a simple 5{\%} exogenous (and costless) increase in energy or labour augmenting technological progress.",
keywords = "computable general equilibrium models, technical progress, energy efficiency, labour productivity, environmental kuznets curve",
author = "Karen Turner and Nick Hanley and {De Fence}, Janine",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Do productivity improvements move us along the Environmental Kuznets Curve? / Turner, Karen; Hanley, Nick; De Fence, Janine.

Glasgow, UK, 2009.

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Do productivity improvements move us along the Environmental Kuznets Curve?

AU - Turner, Karen

AU - Hanley, Nick

AU - De Fence, Janine

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis focuses on the argument that rising prosperity will eventually be accompanied by falling pollution levels as a result of one or more of three factors: (1) structural change in the economy; (2) demand for environmental quality increasing at a more-than-proportional rate; (3) technological progress. Here, we focus on the third of these. In particular, energy efficiency is commonly regarded as a key element of climate policy in terms of achieving reductions in economy-wide CO2 emissions over time. However, a growing literature suggests that improvements in energy efficiency will lead to rebound (or backfire) effects that partially (or wholly) offset energy savings from efficiency improvements. Where efficiency improvements are aimed at the production side of the economy, the net impact of increased efficiency in any input to production will depend on the combination and relative strength of substitution, output/competitiveness, composition and income effects that occur in response to changes in effective and actual factor prices, as well as on the structure of the economy in question, including which sectors are targeted with the efficiency improvement. In this paper we consider whether increasing labour productivity will have a more beneficial, or more predictable, impact on CO2/GDP ratios than improvements in energy efficiency. We do this by using CGE models of the Scottish regional and UK national economies to analyse the impacts of a simple 5% exogenous (and costless) increase in energy or labour augmenting technological progress.

AB - The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis focuses on the argument that rising prosperity will eventually be accompanied by falling pollution levels as a result of one or more of three factors: (1) structural change in the economy; (2) demand for environmental quality increasing at a more-than-proportional rate; (3) technological progress. Here, we focus on the third of these. In particular, energy efficiency is commonly regarded as a key element of climate policy in terms of achieving reductions in economy-wide CO2 emissions over time. However, a growing literature suggests that improvements in energy efficiency will lead to rebound (or backfire) effects that partially (or wholly) offset energy savings from efficiency improvements. Where efficiency improvements are aimed at the production side of the economy, the net impact of increased efficiency in any input to production will depend on the combination and relative strength of substitution, output/competitiveness, composition and income effects that occur in response to changes in effective and actual factor prices, as well as on the structure of the economy in question, including which sectors are targeted with the efficiency improvement. In this paper we consider whether increasing labour productivity will have a more beneficial, or more predictable, impact on CO2/GDP ratios than improvements in energy efficiency. We do this by using CGE models of the Scottish regional and UK national economies to analyse the impacts of a simple 5% exogenous (and costless) increase in energy or labour augmenting technological progress.

KW - computable general equilibrium models

KW - technical progress

KW - energy efficiency

KW - labour productivity

KW - environmental kuznets curve

UR - http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/departments/economics/researchdiscussionpapers/2009/09-08KT.pdf

M3 - Discussion paper

BT - Do productivity improvements move us along the Environmental Kuznets Curve?

CY - Glasgow, UK

ER -