Abstract
This article analyses the recent reform to the EU’s genetically modified organisms (GMO) regime which allows Member States to restrict the cultivation of GMO on their territory for reasons that do not relate to issues of health and safety or the environment. By allowing for national differentiation – although on legally questionable grounds – new Article 26b of Directive 2001/18/EC has been presented as a solution to overcome the impasse in GMO decision-making. However, this article finds that the reform fails to provide a solution for the EU regime’s most pressing problem, namely its disregard for scientific uncertainty and disagreement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 21 Jan 2016 |
Keywords
- GMO
- genetically modified organisms
- cultivation
- risk regulation
- WTO
- internal markets
- legal opt-outs
- EFSA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Divided in diversity: reforming the EU's GMO regime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver