Disconnected capitalism

or why employers can't keep their side of the bargain

P. Thompson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

240 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Those who ply their trade by purveying ideas - academics, policy entrepreneurs, consultants and the like - have a vested interest in proclaiming the new. It is much harder to make a reputation or a splash in the ideas pool by arguing that nothing much has changed. Let's call this the continuity option. Since the early 1980s the big picture franchise has passed to and through a variety of paradigm break theories. We have moved from and through flexible specialization, new production concepts, lean production, post-Fordism, postmodernization, and lately the knowledge economy. While there have, of course, been variations in these perspectives, we can also observe a number of common themes. The argument of this article is that while model building necessarily tends to overstate system cohesiveness, there are powerful structural tendencies, driven by developments in capital markets, which are exacerbating disunity between these different domains. Within modern capitalism economic actors are finding it increasingly difficult to 'make connections' between objectives in the spheres of work and employment, and simultaneously employers are finding it harder to keep their side of any bargain with employees.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-378
Number of pages19
JournalWork, Employment and Society
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Fingerprint

production concept
post-Fordism
lean management
knowledge economy
capital market
entrepreneur
reputation
capitalist society
employer
continuity
employee
paradigm
economics
Employers
Capitalism

Keywords

  • capitalism
  • human resource management
  • work
  • employment

Cite this

@article{30bbffa4b6454d788f9640e894f547ef,
title = "Disconnected capitalism: or why employers can't keep their side of the bargain",
abstract = "Those who ply their trade by purveying ideas - academics, policy entrepreneurs, consultants and the like - have a vested interest in proclaiming the new. It is much harder to make a reputation or a splash in the ideas pool by arguing that nothing much has changed. Let's call this the continuity option. Since the early 1980s the big picture franchise has passed to and through a variety of paradigm break theories. We have moved from and through flexible specialization, new production concepts, lean production, post-Fordism, postmodernization, and lately the knowledge economy. While there have, of course, been variations in these perspectives, we can also observe a number of common themes. The argument of this article is that while model building necessarily tends to overstate system cohesiveness, there are powerful structural tendencies, driven by developments in capital markets, which are exacerbating disunity between these different domains. Within modern capitalism economic actors are finding it increasingly difficult to 'make connections' between objectives in the spheres of work and employment, and simultaneously employers are finding it harder to keep their side of any bargain with employees.",
keywords = "capitalism, human resource management, work, employment",
author = "P. Thompson",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1177/0950017003017002007",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "359--378",
journal = "Work, Employment and Society",
issn = "0950-0170",
number = "2",

}

Disconnected capitalism : or why employers can't keep their side of the bargain. / Thompson, P.

In: Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2003, p. 359-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disconnected capitalism

T2 - or why employers can't keep their side of the bargain

AU - Thompson, P.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Those who ply their trade by purveying ideas - academics, policy entrepreneurs, consultants and the like - have a vested interest in proclaiming the new. It is much harder to make a reputation or a splash in the ideas pool by arguing that nothing much has changed. Let's call this the continuity option. Since the early 1980s the big picture franchise has passed to and through a variety of paradigm break theories. We have moved from and through flexible specialization, new production concepts, lean production, post-Fordism, postmodernization, and lately the knowledge economy. While there have, of course, been variations in these perspectives, we can also observe a number of common themes. The argument of this article is that while model building necessarily tends to overstate system cohesiveness, there are powerful structural tendencies, driven by developments in capital markets, which are exacerbating disunity between these different domains. Within modern capitalism economic actors are finding it increasingly difficult to 'make connections' between objectives in the spheres of work and employment, and simultaneously employers are finding it harder to keep their side of any bargain with employees.

AB - Those who ply their trade by purveying ideas - academics, policy entrepreneurs, consultants and the like - have a vested interest in proclaiming the new. It is much harder to make a reputation or a splash in the ideas pool by arguing that nothing much has changed. Let's call this the continuity option. Since the early 1980s the big picture franchise has passed to and through a variety of paradigm break theories. We have moved from and through flexible specialization, new production concepts, lean production, post-Fordism, postmodernization, and lately the knowledge economy. While there have, of course, been variations in these perspectives, we can also observe a number of common themes. The argument of this article is that while model building necessarily tends to overstate system cohesiveness, there are powerful structural tendencies, driven by developments in capital markets, which are exacerbating disunity between these different domains. Within modern capitalism economic actors are finding it increasingly difficult to 'make connections' between objectives in the spheres of work and employment, and simultaneously employers are finding it harder to keep their side of any bargain with employees.

KW - capitalism

KW - human resource management

KW - work

KW - employment

U2 - 10.1177/0950017003017002007

DO - 10.1177/0950017003017002007

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 359

EP - 378

JO - Work, Employment and Society

JF - Work, Employment and Society

SN - 0950-0170

IS - 2

ER -