Disaffiliation and belonging: Twitter and its agonistic publics

Michael Higgins, Angela Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article looks at forms of political and public engagement to emerge in Web 2.0. Focusing on the platform Twitter, the article looks at both antagonistic and agonistic types of political engagement. It discusses Twitter’s capacity for direct contact with main political party leaders as part of an antagonistic public discourse, geared towards creative expressions of individualised disaffiliation. However, in interventions around @EverydaySexism, the article finds collectivising practices more in keeping with an agonistic public discourse based upon involvement and the tactical use of irony and humour. While showing that the platform provides for new forms of antagonistic engagement with political elites, the article therefore offers support for the view that Web 2.0 gives rise to new and shifting
formations of non-institutionally-aligned political public.
LanguageEnglish
Pages77-89
Number of pages13
JournalSociologia e Politiche Sociali
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

twitter
discourse
irony
political elite
humor
contact
leader

Keywords

  • Twitter
  • agonistic publics
  • political communication
  • public sphere

Cite this

@article{a051b27e0ac640c79b5b25b63d671f8b,
title = "Disaffiliation and belonging: Twitter and its agonistic publics",
abstract = "This article looks at forms of political and public engagement to emerge in Web 2.0. Focusing on the platform Twitter, the article looks at both antagonistic and agonistic types of political engagement. It discusses Twitter’s capacity for direct contact with main political party leaders as part of an antagonistic public discourse, geared towards creative expressions of individualised disaffiliation. However, in interventions around @EverydaySexism, the article finds collectivising practices more in keeping with an agonistic public discourse based upon involvement and the tactical use of irony and humour. While showing that the platform provides for new forms of antagonistic engagement with political elites, the article therefore offers support for the view that Web 2.0 gives rise to new and shiftingformations of non-institutionally-aligned political public.",
keywords = "Twitter, agonistic publics, political communication, public sphere",
author = "Michael Higgins and Angela Smith",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "27",
doi = "10.3280/SP2014-002005",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "77--89",
journal = "Sociologia e Politiche Sociali",
issn = "1591-2027",
publisher = "Franco Angeli Riviste SRL",
number = "2",

}

Disaffiliation and belonging : Twitter and its agonistic publics. / Higgins, Michael; Smith, Angela.

In: Sociologia e Politiche Sociali, Vol. 17, No. 2, 27.10.2014, p. 77-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disaffiliation and belonging

T2 - Sociologia e Politiche Sociali

AU - Higgins, Michael

AU - Smith, Angela

PY - 2014/10/27

Y1 - 2014/10/27

N2 - This article looks at forms of political and public engagement to emerge in Web 2.0. Focusing on the platform Twitter, the article looks at both antagonistic and agonistic types of political engagement. It discusses Twitter’s capacity for direct contact with main political party leaders as part of an antagonistic public discourse, geared towards creative expressions of individualised disaffiliation. However, in interventions around @EverydaySexism, the article finds collectivising practices more in keeping with an agonistic public discourse based upon involvement and the tactical use of irony and humour. While showing that the platform provides for new forms of antagonistic engagement with political elites, the article therefore offers support for the view that Web 2.0 gives rise to new and shiftingformations of non-institutionally-aligned political public.

AB - This article looks at forms of political and public engagement to emerge in Web 2.0. Focusing on the platform Twitter, the article looks at both antagonistic and agonistic types of political engagement. It discusses Twitter’s capacity for direct contact with main political party leaders as part of an antagonistic public discourse, geared towards creative expressions of individualised disaffiliation. However, in interventions around @EverydaySexism, the article finds collectivising practices more in keeping with an agonistic public discourse based upon involvement and the tactical use of irony and humour. While showing that the platform provides for new forms of antagonistic engagement with political elites, the article therefore offers support for the view that Web 2.0 gives rise to new and shiftingformations of non-institutionally-aligned political public.

KW - Twitter

KW - agonistic publics

KW - political communication

KW - public sphere

UR - http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.asp?IDRivista=66&lingua=en

U2 - 10.3280/SP2014-002005

DO - 10.3280/SP2014-002005

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 77

EP - 89

JO - Sociologia e Politiche Sociali

JF - Sociologia e Politiche Sociali

SN - 1591-2027

IS - 2

ER -