Direct and vicarious administrative burden: experiences of UK public services as Homes for Ukraine host

Joe Tomlinson, Eleana Kasoulide, Jed Meers, Simon Halliday

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article shows, through a study of hosts’ experiences of the UK’s Homes for Ukraine scheme, the ways in which sponsoring refugees can impose burdens on sponsors by virtue of the state’s administrative processes. Specifically, it shows how sponsors incur learning, compliance, and psychological costs from administrative burdens and that these burdens are encountered both directly, through their own engagements with public bodies, and vicariously, through the experiences of their guests. The article thus makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the ground-level experience of refugee sponsorship while also expanding the burgeoning theory of administrative burden by demonstrating the relevance of burdens experienced vicariously.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberfeae036
Pages (from-to)768-784
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Refugee Studies
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date23 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024

Funding

Funding support for this article was provided by the Research England Policy Support Fund, as administered by the University of York Policy Engine.

Keywords

  • refugees
  • Homes for Ukraine
  • administrative burden

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct and vicarious administrative burden: experiences of UK public services as Homes for Ukraine host'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this