Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology

Philip Tonner

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Following the interpretive turn in the 1980s, archaeologists have increasingly found inspiration in the works of Martin Heidegger. Gosden’s Social Being and Time and Thomas’ Time, Culture and Identity are important works in this regard. Now, archaeologists speak of the ‘dwelling perspective’: a perspective that stresses the agent’s sensuous experience of living and acting in the world. Recently, Gamble has adopted a phenomenological perspective and has brought interpretation of the Palaeolithic (2,500,000–10,000 years ago) into the purview of this interpretive agenda. This chapter will outline key aspects of this critical appropriation of Heidegger by archaeologists as well as detailing one aspect of Heidegger’s thought that can usefully inform archaeology. I will argue that evidence for mortuary practice deep in the human past is evidence for the advent of a form of engagement that begins to ‘face up to mortality.’ Might such behaviour, discernible by archaeology, record the advent of dwelling in Heidegger’s sense in human prehistory? Discussion of these two related senses of dwelling (as an approach and as a mode of engagement) will show how and why Heidegger’s thought is relevant to archaeology.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationHeidegger in the Twenty-First Century
EditorsTziovanis Georgakis, Paul J. Ennis
Place of PublicationHeidelberg
PublisherSpringer
Pages141-165
Number of pages25
Volume80
ISBN (Print)978-94-017-9678-1
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2015

Publication series

NameContributions to Phenomenology

Fingerprint

Homo Erectus
Archaeology
Phenomenology
Martin Heidegger
Dwelling
Archaeologists
Thought
Mortality
Mortuary Practices
Modes of Engagement
Prehistory
1980s
Social Being
Palaeolithic
Appropriation
Agenda

Keywords

  • phenomenology
  • archaeology
  • Heidegger
  • human evolution
  • dwelling

Cite this

Tonner, P. (2015). Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology. In T. Georgakis, & P. J. Ennis (Eds.), Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century (Vol. 80, pp. 141-165 ). (Contributions to Phenomenology). Heidelberg: Springer.
Tonner, Philip. / Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology. Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century. editor / Tziovanis Georgakis ; Paul J. Ennis. Vol. 80 Heidelberg : Springer, 2015. pp. 141-165 (Contributions to Phenomenology).
@inbook{3dae5677d99c480ab62d2648f4295b50,
title = "Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology",
abstract = "Following the interpretive turn in the 1980s, archaeologists have increasingly found inspiration in the works of Martin Heidegger. Gosden’s Social Being and Time and Thomas’ Time, Culture and Identity are important works in this regard. Now, archaeologists speak of the ‘dwelling perspective’: a perspective that stresses the agent’s sensuous experience of living and acting in the world. Recently, Gamble has adopted a phenomenological perspective and has brought interpretation of the Palaeolithic (2,500,000–10,000 years ago) into the purview of this interpretive agenda. This chapter will outline key aspects of this critical appropriation of Heidegger by archaeologists as well as detailing one aspect of Heidegger’s thought that can usefully inform archaeology. I will argue that evidence for mortuary practice deep in the human past is evidence for the advent of a form of engagement that begins to ‘face up to mortality.’ Might such behaviour, discernible by archaeology, record the advent of dwelling in Heidegger’s sense in human prehistory? Discussion of these two related senses of dwelling (as an approach and as a mode of engagement) will show how and why Heidegger’s thought is relevant to archaeology.",
keywords = "phenomenology, archaeology, Heidegger, human evolution, dwelling",
author = "Philip Tonner",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "2",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-017-9678-1",
volume = "80",
series = "Contributions to Phenomenology",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "141--165",
editor = "Tziovanis Georgakis and Ennis, {Paul J.}",
booktitle = "Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century",

}

Tonner, P 2015, Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology. in T Georgakis & PJ Ennis (eds), Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century. vol. 80, Contributions to Phenomenology, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 141-165 .

Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology. / Tonner, Philip.

Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century. ed. / Tziovanis Georgakis; Paul J. Ennis. Vol. 80 Heidelberg : Springer, 2015. p. 141-165 (Contributions to Phenomenology).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology

AU - Tonner, Philip

PY - 2015/3/2

Y1 - 2015/3/2

N2 - Following the interpretive turn in the 1980s, archaeologists have increasingly found inspiration in the works of Martin Heidegger. Gosden’s Social Being and Time and Thomas’ Time, Culture and Identity are important works in this regard. Now, archaeologists speak of the ‘dwelling perspective’: a perspective that stresses the agent’s sensuous experience of living and acting in the world. Recently, Gamble has adopted a phenomenological perspective and has brought interpretation of the Palaeolithic (2,500,000–10,000 years ago) into the purview of this interpretive agenda. This chapter will outline key aspects of this critical appropriation of Heidegger by archaeologists as well as detailing one aspect of Heidegger’s thought that can usefully inform archaeology. I will argue that evidence for mortuary practice deep in the human past is evidence for the advent of a form of engagement that begins to ‘face up to mortality.’ Might such behaviour, discernible by archaeology, record the advent of dwelling in Heidegger’s sense in human prehistory? Discussion of these two related senses of dwelling (as an approach and as a mode of engagement) will show how and why Heidegger’s thought is relevant to archaeology.

AB - Following the interpretive turn in the 1980s, archaeologists have increasingly found inspiration in the works of Martin Heidegger. Gosden’s Social Being and Time and Thomas’ Time, Culture and Identity are important works in this regard. Now, archaeologists speak of the ‘dwelling perspective’: a perspective that stresses the agent’s sensuous experience of living and acting in the world. Recently, Gamble has adopted a phenomenological perspective and has brought interpretation of the Palaeolithic (2,500,000–10,000 years ago) into the purview of this interpretive agenda. This chapter will outline key aspects of this critical appropriation of Heidegger by archaeologists as well as detailing one aspect of Heidegger’s thought that can usefully inform archaeology. I will argue that evidence for mortuary practice deep in the human past is evidence for the advent of a form of engagement that begins to ‘face up to mortality.’ Might such behaviour, discernible by archaeology, record the advent of dwelling in Heidegger’s sense in human prehistory? Discussion of these two related senses of dwelling (as an approach and as a mode of engagement) will show how and why Heidegger’s thought is relevant to archaeology.

KW - phenomenology

KW - archaeology

KW - Heidegger

KW - human evolution

KW - dwelling

UR - http://www.springer.com/gb/book/9789401796781

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-94-017-9678-1

VL - 80

T3 - Contributions to Phenomenology

SP - 141

EP - 165

BT - Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century

A2 - Georgakis, Tziovanis

A2 - Ennis, Paul J.

PB - Springer

CY - Heidelberg

ER -

Tonner P. Did Homo erectus dwell? Heidegger, archaeology and the future of phenomenology. In Georgakis T, Ennis PJ, editors, Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century. Vol. 80. Heidelberg: Springer. 2015. p. 141-165 . (Contributions to Phenomenology).