Devolution: problems and prospects

Neil McGarvey, J. Bradbury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article assesses the consolidation of devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in turn. Despite the different conditions, the same questions are of general relevance. Firstly, had authoritative political leadership and successful approaches to public policy improving the image of devolution been established? Secondly, had the devolved institutions enhanced their political legitimacy, and what implications had this had for their future development? A final section considers developments in England. After 1997, only Greater London had received a quasi-elected regional assembly, while the rest of England had been developed on a purely administrative model. Consolidation in this case revolved around the case for regional devolution being considered. Overall, the year was notable for confirming the highly mixed experience in each territory relative to the specific aspirations of the main territorial actors. This served to underline the extent to which a post-devolution UK system of governance, whilst much less politically unstable than before, was a long way from settling down.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-236
Number of pages17
JournalParliamentary Affairs
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2003

Fingerprint

decentralization
consolidation
political leadership
settling
legitimacy
public policy
governance
experience

Keywords

  • devolution
  • public policy
  • government
  • scottish politics
  • scotland

Cite this

McGarvey, Neil ; Bradbury, J. / Devolution: problems and prospects. In: Parliamentary Affairs. 2003 ; Vol. 56, No. 2. pp. 219-236.
@article{bde425bc5e404799aa3d4acd37acbc05,
title = "Devolution: problems and prospects",
abstract = "The article assesses the consolidation of devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in turn. Despite the different conditions, the same questions are of general relevance. Firstly, had authoritative political leadership and successful approaches to public policy improving the image of devolution been established? Secondly, had the devolved institutions enhanced their political legitimacy, and what implications had this had for their future development? A final section considers developments in England. After 1997, only Greater London had received a quasi-elected regional assembly, while the rest of England had been developed on a purely administrative model. Consolidation in this case revolved around the case for regional devolution being considered. Overall, the year was notable for confirming the highly mixed experience in each territory relative to the specific aspirations of the main territorial actors. This served to underline the extent to which a post-devolution UK system of governance, whilst much less politically unstable than before, was a long way from settling down.",
keywords = "devolution, public policy, government, scottish politics, scotland",
author = "Neil McGarvey and J. Bradbury",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1093/parlij/gsg015",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "219--236",
journal = "Parliamentary Affairs",
issn = "0031-2290",
number = "2",

}

Devolution: problems and prospects. / McGarvey, Neil; Bradbury, J.

In: Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 2, 04.2003, p. 219-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Devolution: problems and prospects

AU - McGarvey, Neil

AU - Bradbury, J.

PY - 2003/4

Y1 - 2003/4

N2 - The article assesses the consolidation of devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in turn. Despite the different conditions, the same questions are of general relevance. Firstly, had authoritative political leadership and successful approaches to public policy improving the image of devolution been established? Secondly, had the devolved institutions enhanced their political legitimacy, and what implications had this had for their future development? A final section considers developments in England. After 1997, only Greater London had received a quasi-elected regional assembly, while the rest of England had been developed on a purely administrative model. Consolidation in this case revolved around the case for regional devolution being considered. Overall, the year was notable for confirming the highly mixed experience in each territory relative to the specific aspirations of the main territorial actors. This served to underline the extent to which a post-devolution UK system of governance, whilst much less politically unstable than before, was a long way from settling down.

AB - The article assesses the consolidation of devolution in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in turn. Despite the different conditions, the same questions are of general relevance. Firstly, had authoritative political leadership and successful approaches to public policy improving the image of devolution been established? Secondly, had the devolved institutions enhanced their political legitimacy, and what implications had this had for their future development? A final section considers developments in England. After 1997, only Greater London had received a quasi-elected regional assembly, while the rest of England had been developed on a purely administrative model. Consolidation in this case revolved around the case for regional devolution being considered. Overall, the year was notable for confirming the highly mixed experience in each territory relative to the specific aspirations of the main territorial actors. This served to underline the extent to which a post-devolution UK system of governance, whilst much less politically unstable than before, was a long way from settling down.

KW - devolution

KW - public policy

KW - government

KW - scottish politics

KW - scotland

UR - http://pa.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/56/2/219.pdf

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/parlij/gsg015

U2 - 10.1093/parlij/gsg015

DO - 10.1093/parlij/gsg015

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 219

EP - 236

JO - Parliamentary Affairs

JF - Parliamentary Affairs

SN - 0031-2290

IS - 2

ER -