Devolution of power, revolution in public health?

Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Katherine E Smith, David Stuckler, Martin McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

On 8 May 2015, the Conservative party won an unexpected majority in the UK general election.1 Commentators argued that a potentially decisive factor was concern in England about the Scottish National Party (SNP) forcing a minority Labour government to ‘dance to the SNP’s tune.’2 Meanwhile the SNP won a historic number of seats in Scotland, capturing 56 of the 59 Westminster constituencies. The election took place against a backdrop of debate about the future of the UK. Although the Scottish independence referendum was lost, it was widely agreed that the status quo no longer remained feasible. At the same time, there is pressure to revisit Welsh devolution3 and the Westminster government has proposed devolving certain powers to locally elected
decision-makers in English regions.4 Meanwhile, the new Conservative government has committed to a referendum on continuing European Union membership, reflecting calls for ‘Brexit’.5 Although initially emanating from those on the right of the political spectrum, there is now some support from the left,6 making it a real possibility and likely to trigger a second Scottish referendum. One way or another, substantial political change is looming. If we conceive of ‘health’ as ‘health care’ (as many political scientists do), it could be argued that further devolution has little significance since responsibility for the NHS is already devolved to each national administration.7 Yet, most of the major determinants of population health and health inequalities lie outside the health system, often in areas for which responsibility has so far remained in Westminster.8,9 For example, macro-economic and welfare policies have large health impacts, potentially more so than health services and,10 while the relatively modest scale of devolution has not yet led to marked divergence in such policies, this looks set to change. We apply a political science framework focussing on ideas, interests and institutions to demonstrate potential opportunities and threats to public health arising from political change, so that researchers and practitioners can better engage with the political determinants of health.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241–247
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Public Health
Volume39
Issue number2
Early online date10 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

decentralization
Public Health
public health
Health
referendum
health
political change
determinants
conservative party
responsibility
economic policy
political scientist
Scotland
European Union
dance
England
divergence
political science
Health Services
social policy

Keywords

  • public health
  • devolution of power
  • health care
  • devolution
  • health policy
  • welfare policy
  • economics

Cite this

Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal ; Smith, Katherine E ; Stuckler, David ; McKee, Martin. / Devolution of power, revolution in public health?. In: Journal of Public Health. 2017 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 241–247.
@article{6a2be903b2294056b5e1fb0a9140c7f9,
title = "Devolution of power, revolution in public health?",
abstract = "On 8 May 2015, the Conservative party won an unexpected majority in the UK general election.1 Commentators argued that a potentially decisive factor was concern in England about the Scottish National Party (SNP) forcing a minority Labour government to ‘dance to the SNP’s tune.’2 Meanwhile the SNP won a historic number of seats in Scotland, capturing 56 of the 59 Westminster constituencies. The election took place against a backdrop of debate about the future of the UK. Although the Scottish independence referendum was lost, it was widely agreed that the status quo no longer remained feasible. At the same time, there is pressure to revisit Welsh devolution3 and the Westminster government has proposed devolving certain powers to locally electeddecision-makers in English regions.4 Meanwhile, the new Conservative government has committed to a referendum on continuing European Union membership, reflecting calls for ‘Brexit’.5 Although initially emanating from those on the right of the political spectrum, there is now some support from the left,6 making it a real possibility and likely to trigger a second Scottish referendum. One way or another, substantial political change is looming. If we conceive of ‘health’ as ‘health care’ (as many political scientists do), it could be argued that further devolution has little significance since responsibility for the NHS is already devolved to each national administration.7 Yet, most of the major determinants of population health and health inequalities lie outside the health system, often in areas for which responsibility has so far remained in Westminster.8,9 For example, macro-economic and welfare policies have large health impacts, potentially more so than health services and,10 while the relatively modest scale of devolution has not yet led to marked divergence in such policies, this looks set to change. We apply a political science framework focussing on ideas, interests and institutions to demonstrate potential opportunities and threats to public health arising from political change, so that researchers and practitioners can better engage with the political determinants of health.",
keywords = "public health, devolution of power, health care, devolution, health policy, welfare policy, economics",
author = "Katikireddi, {Srinivasa Vittal} and Smith, {Katherine E} and David Stuckler and Martin McKee",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1093/pubmed/fdw031",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "241–247",
journal = "Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1741-3842",
number = "2",

}

Katikireddi, SV, Smith, KE, Stuckler, D & McKee, M 2017, 'Devolution of power, revolution in public health?', Journal of Public Health, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw031

Devolution of power, revolution in public health? / Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Smith, Katherine E; Stuckler, David; McKee, Martin.

In: Journal of Public Health, Vol. 39, No. 2, 30.06.2017, p. 241–247.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Devolution of power, revolution in public health?

AU - Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal

AU - Smith, Katherine E

AU - Stuckler, David

AU - McKee, Martin

PY - 2017/6/30

Y1 - 2017/6/30

N2 - On 8 May 2015, the Conservative party won an unexpected majority in the UK general election.1 Commentators argued that a potentially decisive factor was concern in England about the Scottish National Party (SNP) forcing a minority Labour government to ‘dance to the SNP’s tune.’2 Meanwhile the SNP won a historic number of seats in Scotland, capturing 56 of the 59 Westminster constituencies. The election took place against a backdrop of debate about the future of the UK. Although the Scottish independence referendum was lost, it was widely agreed that the status quo no longer remained feasible. At the same time, there is pressure to revisit Welsh devolution3 and the Westminster government has proposed devolving certain powers to locally electeddecision-makers in English regions.4 Meanwhile, the new Conservative government has committed to a referendum on continuing European Union membership, reflecting calls for ‘Brexit’.5 Although initially emanating from those on the right of the political spectrum, there is now some support from the left,6 making it a real possibility and likely to trigger a second Scottish referendum. One way or another, substantial political change is looming. If we conceive of ‘health’ as ‘health care’ (as many political scientists do), it could be argued that further devolution has little significance since responsibility for the NHS is already devolved to each national administration.7 Yet, most of the major determinants of population health and health inequalities lie outside the health system, often in areas for which responsibility has so far remained in Westminster.8,9 For example, macro-economic and welfare policies have large health impacts, potentially more so than health services and,10 while the relatively modest scale of devolution has not yet led to marked divergence in such policies, this looks set to change. We apply a political science framework focussing on ideas, interests and institutions to demonstrate potential opportunities and threats to public health arising from political change, so that researchers and practitioners can better engage with the political determinants of health.

AB - On 8 May 2015, the Conservative party won an unexpected majority in the UK general election.1 Commentators argued that a potentially decisive factor was concern in England about the Scottish National Party (SNP) forcing a minority Labour government to ‘dance to the SNP’s tune.’2 Meanwhile the SNP won a historic number of seats in Scotland, capturing 56 of the 59 Westminster constituencies. The election took place against a backdrop of debate about the future of the UK. Although the Scottish independence referendum was lost, it was widely agreed that the status quo no longer remained feasible. At the same time, there is pressure to revisit Welsh devolution3 and the Westminster government has proposed devolving certain powers to locally electeddecision-makers in English regions.4 Meanwhile, the new Conservative government has committed to a referendum on continuing European Union membership, reflecting calls for ‘Brexit’.5 Although initially emanating from those on the right of the political spectrum, there is now some support from the left,6 making it a real possibility and likely to trigger a second Scottish referendum. One way or another, substantial political change is looming. If we conceive of ‘health’ as ‘health care’ (as many political scientists do), it could be argued that further devolution has little significance since responsibility for the NHS is already devolved to each national administration.7 Yet, most of the major determinants of population health and health inequalities lie outside the health system, often in areas for which responsibility has so far remained in Westminster.8,9 For example, macro-economic and welfare policies have large health impacts, potentially more so than health services and,10 while the relatively modest scale of devolution has not yet led to marked divergence in such policies, this looks set to change. We apply a political science framework focussing on ideas, interests and institutions to demonstrate potential opportunities and threats to public health arising from political change, so that researchers and practitioners can better engage with the political determinants of health.

KW - public health

KW - devolution of power

KW - health care

KW - devolution

KW - health policy

KW - welfare policy

KW - economics

U2 - 10.1093/pubmed/fdw031

DO - 10.1093/pubmed/fdw031

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 241

EP - 247

JO - Journal of Public Health

JF - Journal of Public Health

SN - 1741-3842

IS - 2

ER -