Devolution and party change: candidate selection for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections

James Mitchell, J. Bradbury, D. Denver, L Bennie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article analyses the candidate selection procedures of each of the major parties in the run‐up to the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections, assessing the extent to which they reveal developments in party democratisation and decentralisation on the one hand, and evidence of countervailing central control on the other. Procedural innovations achieved greater openness in candidate nomination and gender balance in candidatures but developments in democratisation were contested and evidence of decentralisation was mixed. Surveys of candidates reveal a perception in the Labour Party that there was too much central influence, although its implications differed in Scotland and Wales. There were perceptions of unfairness and lack of internal democracy in the other parties as well, suggesting in particular a contradiction between central influence in all of the parties’ approaches to list selection and candidates’ expectations of such influence diminishing. Devolution, therefore, released tensions in all parties.
LanguageEnglish
Pages51-72
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Legislative Studies
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

parliament
decentralization
candidacy
election
democratization
selection procedure
Labour Party
evidence
democracy
innovation
lack
gender

Keywords

  • devolution
  • elections
  • Scottish Politics
  • Welsh devolution
  • home rule

Cite this

Mitchell, James ; Bradbury, J. ; Denver, D. ; Bennie , L . / Devolution and party change : candidate selection for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections. In: Journal of Legislative Studies . 2000 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 51-72.
@article{aa17cf6d8e62494a9cd8044109ed7df6,
title = "Devolution and party change: candidate selection for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections",
abstract = "The article analyses the candidate selection procedures of each of the major parties in the run‐up to the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections, assessing the extent to which they reveal developments in party democratisation and decentralisation on the one hand, and evidence of countervailing central control on the other. Procedural innovations achieved greater openness in candidate nomination and gender balance in candidatures but developments in democratisation were contested and evidence of decentralisation was mixed. Surveys of candidates reveal a perception in the Labour Party that there was too much central influence, although its implications differed in Scotland and Wales. There were perceptions of unfairness and lack of internal democracy in the other parties as well, suggesting in particular a contradiction between central influence in all of the parties’ approaches to list selection and candidates’ expectations of such influence diminishing. Devolution, therefore, released tensions in all parties.",
keywords = "devolution, elections, Scottish Politics, Welsh devolution, home rule",
author = "James Mitchell and J. Bradbury and D. Denver and L Bennie",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1080/13572330008420631",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "51--72",
journal = "Journal of Legislative Studies",
issn = "1357-2334",
number = "3",

}

Devolution and party change : candidate selection for the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections. / Mitchell, James; Bradbury, J.; Denver, D.; Bennie , L .

In: Journal of Legislative Studies , Vol. 6, No. 3, 2000, p. 51-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Devolution and party change

T2 - Journal of Legislative Studies

AU - Mitchell, James

AU - Bradbury, J.

AU - Denver, D.

AU - Bennie , L

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The article analyses the candidate selection procedures of each of the major parties in the run‐up to the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections, assessing the extent to which they reveal developments in party democratisation and decentralisation on the one hand, and evidence of countervailing central control on the other. Procedural innovations achieved greater openness in candidate nomination and gender balance in candidatures but developments in democratisation were contested and evidence of decentralisation was mixed. Surveys of candidates reveal a perception in the Labour Party that there was too much central influence, although its implications differed in Scotland and Wales. There were perceptions of unfairness and lack of internal democracy in the other parties as well, suggesting in particular a contradiction between central influence in all of the parties’ approaches to list selection and candidates’ expectations of such influence diminishing. Devolution, therefore, released tensions in all parties.

AB - The article analyses the candidate selection procedures of each of the major parties in the run‐up to the 1999 Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly elections, assessing the extent to which they reveal developments in party democratisation and decentralisation on the one hand, and evidence of countervailing central control on the other. Procedural innovations achieved greater openness in candidate nomination and gender balance in candidatures but developments in democratisation were contested and evidence of decentralisation was mixed. Surveys of candidates reveal a perception in the Labour Party that there was too much central influence, although its implications differed in Scotland and Wales. There were perceptions of unfairness and lack of internal democracy in the other parties as well, suggesting in particular a contradiction between central influence in all of the parties’ approaches to list selection and candidates’ expectations of such influence diminishing. Devolution, therefore, released tensions in all parties.

KW - devolution

KW - elections

KW - Scottish Politics

KW - Welsh devolution

KW - home rule

U2 - 10.1080/13572330008420631

DO - 10.1080/13572330008420631

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 51

EP - 72

JO - Journal of Legislative Studies

JF - Journal of Legislative Studies

SN - 1357-2334

IS - 3

ER -