Development of an obstetrics triage tool for pharmacists in an urban medical centre

J. R. Covvey, J. Grant, A. B. Mullen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Obstetrics services are a high-throughput and high-risk environment poised for pharmacist involvement, but determining how to ideally allocate services is difficult. There is recent interest in the development of tools for service prioritisation, but none are specifically targeted to obstetrics. Therefore, the aim of this study was (1) to conduct a practice audit surveying the demographics of patients attending obstetrics wards at a high-capacity maternity hospital, and (2) to evaluate a triage tool developed to prioritise pharmacy services. A retrospective case review of women discharged after birth admissions was undertaken at a hospital in National Health Service (NHS) Scotland during June 2014. Demographic and admission data were collected, as well as pharmacist interventions and missed opportunities in patient care on postnatal wards. A pharmacy triage tool was developed and retrospectively applied to each case to ascertain a risk category that would trigger and target pharmacist review. Interventions/opportunities were classified as either clinical (medication-related) or administrative (potential for error development). 175 cases were reviewed with a median age of 29 years old. Eighty-six patients (49.1%) were retrospectively classified with elevated risk using the triage tool. A total of 117 charts (66.9%) were identified with missed opportunities for pharmacist intervention, which was significantly higher among patients classified as higher risk (75.6 vs. 58.4%, p=0.017). Compared to low risk patients, patients with a higher risk classification had lower rates of administrative missed opportunities (55.4 vs. 80.8%, p=0.015), but numerically higher rates of clinical (26.2 vs. 9.6%, p=NS) and mixed clinical/administrative (18.5 vs. 9.6%, p=NS) missed opportunities, although this failed to reach statistical significance. Evaluation of a triage tool for obstetric services demonstrated potential for prioritising higher risk patients for pharmacist review and addressing opportunities for clinical improvements.
LanguageEnglish
Pages539–544
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Volume40
Issue number5
Early online date25 Jun 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Triage
Pharmacists
Obstetrics
Demography
Maternity Hospitals
Pharmaceutical Services
National Health Programs
Scotland
Patient Care
Parturition

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • maternity
  • triage
  • risk assessment

Cite this

@article{9859c0f0143841d7bfd4603f8bae5d7e,
title = "Development of an obstetrics triage tool for pharmacists in an urban medical centre",
abstract = "Obstetrics services are a high-throughput and high-risk environment poised for pharmacist involvement, but determining how to ideally allocate services is difficult. There is recent interest in the development of tools for service prioritisation, but none are specifically targeted to obstetrics. Therefore, the aim of this study was (1) to conduct a practice audit surveying the demographics of patients attending obstetrics wards at a high-capacity maternity hospital, and (2) to evaluate a triage tool developed to prioritise pharmacy services. A retrospective case review of women discharged after birth admissions was undertaken at a hospital in National Health Service (NHS) Scotland during June 2014. Demographic and admission data were collected, as well as pharmacist interventions and missed opportunities in patient care on postnatal wards. A pharmacy triage tool was developed and retrospectively applied to each case to ascertain a risk category that would trigger and target pharmacist review. Interventions/opportunities were classified as either clinical (medication-related) or administrative (potential for error development). 175 cases were reviewed with a median age of 29 years old. Eighty-six patients (49.1{\%}) were retrospectively classified with elevated risk using the triage tool. A total of 117 charts (66.9{\%}) were identified with missed opportunities for pharmacist intervention, which was significantly higher among patients classified as higher risk (75.6 vs. 58.4{\%}, p=0.017). Compared to low risk patients, patients with a higher risk classification had lower rates of administrative missed opportunities (55.4 vs. 80.8{\%}, p=0.015), but numerically higher rates of clinical (26.2 vs. 9.6{\%}, p=NS) and mixed clinical/administrative (18.5 vs. 9.6{\%}, p=NS) missed opportunities, although this failed to reach statistical significance. Evaluation of a triage tool for obstetric services demonstrated potential for prioritising higher risk patients for pharmacist review and addressing opportunities for clinical improvements.",
keywords = "pregnancy, maternity , triage, risk assessment",
author = "Covvey, {J. R.} and J. Grant and Mullen, {A. B.}",
note = "Date accepted:18/05/2015 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Covvey, J. R., Grant, J., & Mullen, A. (2015). Development of an obstetrics triage tool for pharmacists in an urban medical centre. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. which has been published in final form at http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12301. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/jcpt.12301",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "539–544",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics",
issn = "0269-4727",
number = "5",

}

Development of an obstetrics triage tool for pharmacists in an urban medical centre. / Covvey, J. R.; Grant, J.; Mullen, A. B.

In: Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, Vol. 40, No. 5, 10.2015, p. 539–544.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of an obstetrics triage tool for pharmacists in an urban medical centre

AU - Covvey, J. R.

AU - Grant, J.

AU - Mullen, A. B.

N1 - Date accepted:18/05/2015 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Covvey, J. R., Grant, J., & Mullen, A. (2015). Development of an obstetrics triage tool for pharmacists in an urban medical centre. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. which has been published in final form at http://www.dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.12301. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Obstetrics services are a high-throughput and high-risk environment poised for pharmacist involvement, but determining how to ideally allocate services is difficult. There is recent interest in the development of tools for service prioritisation, but none are specifically targeted to obstetrics. Therefore, the aim of this study was (1) to conduct a practice audit surveying the demographics of patients attending obstetrics wards at a high-capacity maternity hospital, and (2) to evaluate a triage tool developed to prioritise pharmacy services. A retrospective case review of women discharged after birth admissions was undertaken at a hospital in National Health Service (NHS) Scotland during June 2014. Demographic and admission data were collected, as well as pharmacist interventions and missed opportunities in patient care on postnatal wards. A pharmacy triage tool was developed and retrospectively applied to each case to ascertain a risk category that would trigger and target pharmacist review. Interventions/opportunities were classified as either clinical (medication-related) or administrative (potential for error development). 175 cases were reviewed with a median age of 29 years old. Eighty-six patients (49.1%) were retrospectively classified with elevated risk using the triage tool. A total of 117 charts (66.9%) were identified with missed opportunities for pharmacist intervention, which was significantly higher among patients classified as higher risk (75.6 vs. 58.4%, p=0.017). Compared to low risk patients, patients with a higher risk classification had lower rates of administrative missed opportunities (55.4 vs. 80.8%, p=0.015), but numerically higher rates of clinical (26.2 vs. 9.6%, p=NS) and mixed clinical/administrative (18.5 vs. 9.6%, p=NS) missed opportunities, although this failed to reach statistical significance. Evaluation of a triage tool for obstetric services demonstrated potential for prioritising higher risk patients for pharmacist review and addressing opportunities for clinical improvements.

AB - Obstetrics services are a high-throughput and high-risk environment poised for pharmacist involvement, but determining how to ideally allocate services is difficult. There is recent interest in the development of tools for service prioritisation, but none are specifically targeted to obstetrics. Therefore, the aim of this study was (1) to conduct a practice audit surveying the demographics of patients attending obstetrics wards at a high-capacity maternity hospital, and (2) to evaluate a triage tool developed to prioritise pharmacy services. A retrospective case review of women discharged after birth admissions was undertaken at a hospital in National Health Service (NHS) Scotland during June 2014. Demographic and admission data were collected, as well as pharmacist interventions and missed opportunities in patient care on postnatal wards. A pharmacy triage tool was developed and retrospectively applied to each case to ascertain a risk category that would trigger and target pharmacist review. Interventions/opportunities were classified as either clinical (medication-related) or administrative (potential for error development). 175 cases were reviewed with a median age of 29 years old. Eighty-six patients (49.1%) were retrospectively classified with elevated risk using the triage tool. A total of 117 charts (66.9%) were identified with missed opportunities for pharmacist intervention, which was significantly higher among patients classified as higher risk (75.6 vs. 58.4%, p=0.017). Compared to low risk patients, patients with a higher risk classification had lower rates of administrative missed opportunities (55.4 vs. 80.8%, p=0.015), but numerically higher rates of clinical (26.2 vs. 9.6%, p=NS) and mixed clinical/administrative (18.5 vs. 9.6%, p=NS) missed opportunities, although this failed to reach statistical significance. Evaluation of a triage tool for obstetric services demonstrated potential for prioritising higher risk patients for pharmacist review and addressing opportunities for clinical improvements.

KW - pregnancy

KW - maternity

KW - triage

KW - risk assessment

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291365-2710

U2 - 10.1111/jcpt.12301

DO - 10.1111/jcpt.12301

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 539

EP - 544

JO - Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics

T2 - Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics

JF - Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics

SN - 0269-4727

IS - 5

ER -