TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing an integrated biomedical and behavioural theory of functioning and disability
T2 - adding models of behaviour to the ICF framework
AU - Johnston, Marie
AU - Dixon, Diane
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Health Psychology Review on 28th November 2013, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17437199.2013.855592
PY - 2014/12/31
Y1 - 2014/12/31
N2 - The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) offers an agreed language on which a scientific model of functional outcomes can be built. The ICF defines functional outcomes as activity and activity limitations (AL) and defines both in behavioural terms. The ICF, therefore, appears to invite explanations of AL as behaviours. Studies of AL find that psychological variables, especially perceptions of control, add to biomedical variables in predicting AL. Therefore, two improved models are proposed, which integrate the ICF with two psychological theories, the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and social cognitive theory (SCT). These models have a sound evidence base as good predictors of behaviour, include perceived control constructs and are compatible with existing evidence about AL. When directly tested in studies of community and clinic-based populations, both integrated models (ICF/TPB and ICF/SCT) outperform each of the three basic models (ICF, TPB and SCT). However, when predicting activity rather than AL, the biomedical model of the ICF does not improve prediction of activity by TPB and SCT on their own. It is concluded that these models offer a better explanation of functional outcomes than the ICF alone and could form the basis for the development of improved models.
AB - The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) offers an agreed language on which a scientific model of functional outcomes can be built. The ICF defines functional outcomes as activity and activity limitations (AL) and defines both in behavioural terms. The ICF, therefore, appears to invite explanations of AL as behaviours. Studies of AL find that psychological variables, especially perceptions of control, add to biomedical variables in predicting AL. Therefore, two improved models are proposed, which integrate the ICF with two psychological theories, the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and social cognitive theory (SCT). These models have a sound evidence base as good predictors of behaviour, include perceived control constructs and are compatible with existing evidence about AL. When directly tested in studies of community and clinic-based populations, both integrated models (ICF/TPB and ICF/SCT) outperform each of the three basic models (ICF, TPB and SCT). However, when predicting activity rather than AL, the biomedical model of the ICF does not improve prediction of activity by TPB and SCT on their own. It is concluded that these models offer a better explanation of functional outcomes than the ICF alone and could form the basis for the development of improved models.
KW - disability
KW - ICF
KW - social cognitive theory
KW - theory
KW - TPB
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888780177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rhpr20/current
U2 - 10.1080/17437199.2013.855592
DO - 10.1080/17437199.2013.855592
M3 - Article
C2 - 25211207
SN - 1743-7199
VL - 8
SP - 381
EP - 403
JO - Health Psychology Review
JF - Health Psychology Review
IS - 4
ER -