Determining refugee status under Directive 2004/83

Comment on Bolbol (C-31/09)

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Bolbol, the European Court of Justice considered the refusal of the Hungarian authorities to grant refugee status to a stateless Palestinian. Her claim relied on a provision of the Geneva Convention contained in Directive 2004/83 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals as refugees. The ECJ was willing to consider that the minimum standards extended to considering the eligibility of a Palestinian displaced after 1951 as a refugee, but that the individual in question must have actually, not potentially, availed themselves of UN protection or assistance. The Court interpreted a vaguely worded provision of the Geneva Convention in a narrow way, though it rejected the even narrower approaches put forward by some Member States. In this article, the author discusses the balancing act undertaken by the ECJ when considering minimum standards legislation in a dynamic and rapidly evolving domain of EU law-making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)135-145
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Law Review
Volume36
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Geneva Convention
refugee
third countries
European Court of Justice
European Law
qualification
UNO
assistance
legislation

Keywords

  • asylum seekers
  • EU law
  • Palestine
  • refugees

Cite this

@article{241f1d96d32444e6957241684ef80998,
title = "Determining refugee status under Directive 2004/83: Comment on Bolbol (C-31/09)",
abstract = "In Bolbol, the European Court of Justice considered the refusal of the Hungarian authorities to grant refugee status to a stateless Palestinian. Her claim relied on a provision of the Geneva Convention contained in Directive 2004/83 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals as refugees. The ECJ was willing to consider that the minimum standards extended to considering the eligibility of a Palestinian displaced after 1951 as a refugee, but that the individual in question must have actually, not potentially, availed themselves of UN protection or assistance. The Court interpreted a vaguely worded provision of the Geneva Convention in a narrow way, though it rejected the even narrower approaches put forward by some Member States. In this article, the author discusses the balancing act undertaken by the ECJ when considering minimum standards legislation in a dynamic and rapidly evolving domain of EU law-making.",
keywords = "asylum seekers, EU law, Palestine, refugees",
author = "Cardwell, {Paul James}",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "135--145",
journal = "European Law Review",
issn = "0307-5400",
number = "1",

}

Determining refugee status under Directive 2004/83 : Comment on Bolbol (C-31/09). / Cardwell, Paul James.

In: European Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.02.2011, p. 135-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining refugee status under Directive 2004/83

T2 - Comment on Bolbol (C-31/09)

AU - Cardwell, Paul James

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - In Bolbol, the European Court of Justice considered the refusal of the Hungarian authorities to grant refugee status to a stateless Palestinian. Her claim relied on a provision of the Geneva Convention contained in Directive 2004/83 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals as refugees. The ECJ was willing to consider that the minimum standards extended to considering the eligibility of a Palestinian displaced after 1951 as a refugee, but that the individual in question must have actually, not potentially, availed themselves of UN protection or assistance. The Court interpreted a vaguely worded provision of the Geneva Convention in a narrow way, though it rejected the even narrower approaches put forward by some Member States. In this article, the author discusses the balancing act undertaken by the ECJ when considering minimum standards legislation in a dynamic and rapidly evolving domain of EU law-making.

AB - In Bolbol, the European Court of Justice considered the refusal of the Hungarian authorities to grant refugee status to a stateless Palestinian. Her claim relied on a provision of the Geneva Convention contained in Directive 2004/83 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third-country nationals as refugees. The ECJ was willing to consider that the minimum standards extended to considering the eligibility of a Palestinian displaced after 1951 as a refugee, but that the individual in question must have actually, not potentially, availed themselves of UN protection or assistance. The Court interpreted a vaguely worded provision of the Geneva Convention in a narrow way, though it rejected the even narrower approaches put forward by some Member States. In this article, the author discusses the balancing act undertaken by the ECJ when considering minimum standards legislation in a dynamic and rapidly evolving domain of EU law-making.

KW - asylum seekers

KW - EU law

KW - Palestine

KW - refugees

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052257639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 36

SP - 135

EP - 145

JO - European Law Review

JF - European Law Review

SN - 0307-5400

IS - 1

ER -