Detailed comparison of energy-related time-use diaries and monitored residential electricity demand

Kiti Suomalainen, David Eyers, Rebecca Ford, Janet Stephenson, Ben Anderson, Michael Jack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Understanding demand flexibility in the residential sector depends on understanding the causal link between household occupants’ activities and resulting electricity demand. Self-reported electricity use via time-use diaries is often used as a direct descriptor of occupants’ activities and has been integrated into residential electricity demand simulation models. Conversely, smart meter electricity demand data is increasingly used to infer occupants’ activities. Underlying both these approaches are a number of unverified assumptions about people’s perceptions of their energy use, the accuracy with which they report these activities and the physical operation of electrical devices. This paper carries out a comparison between self-reported energy-related activities and monitored electricity demand in 15 households over a week-long time period, with focus on electric hot water cylinders and heat pumps as appliances with large potential for demand flexibility. This comparison quantifies the extent to which self-reported activity is a predictor of electricity demand and conversely, whether electricity demand can accurately identify occupant activity. Results show that, although there is significant variation across households, self-reported activity tends to be a reasonably good predictor of electricity demand. However, due to the intervention of thermostat-controlled devices, electricity demand is not a good indicator of occupant activity.
LanguageEnglish
Pages418-427
Number of pages10
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume183
Early online date16 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Electricity
Smart meters
Thermostats
Pumps
Water

Keywords

  • time-use diary
  • residential electricity demand
  • demand flexibility

Cite this

Suomalainen, Kiti ; Eyers, David ; Ford, Rebecca ; Stephenson, Janet ; Anderson, Ben ; Jack, Michael. / Detailed comparison of energy-related time-use diaries and monitored residential electricity demand. In: Energy and Buildings. 2019 ; Vol. 183. pp. 418-427.
@article{c2b17b34d4a44aa594a22e9e8b894f8d,
title = "Detailed comparison of energy-related time-use diaries and monitored residential electricity demand",
abstract = "Understanding demand flexibility in the residential sector depends on understanding the causal link between household occupants’ activities and resulting electricity demand. Self-reported electricity use via time-use diaries is often used as a direct descriptor of occupants’ activities and has been integrated into residential electricity demand simulation models. Conversely, smart meter electricity demand data is increasingly used to infer occupants’ activities. Underlying both these approaches are a number of unverified assumptions about people’s perceptions of their energy use, the accuracy with which they report these activities and the physical operation of electrical devices. This paper carries out a comparison between self-reported energy-related activities and monitored electricity demand in 15 households over a week-long time period, with focus on electric hot water cylinders and heat pumps as appliances with large potential for demand flexibility. This comparison quantifies the extent to which self-reported activity is a predictor of electricity demand and conversely, whether electricity demand can accurately identify occupant activity. Results show that, although there is significant variation across households, self-reported activity tends to be a reasonably good predictor of electricity demand. However, due to the intervention of thermostat-controlled devices, electricity demand is not a good indicator of occupant activity.",
keywords = "time-use diary, residential electricity demand, demand flexibility",
author = "Kiti Suomalainen and David Eyers and Rebecca Ford and Janet Stephenson and Ben Anderson and Michael Jack",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.002",
language = "English",
volume = "183",
pages = "418--427",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Detailed comparison of energy-related time-use diaries and monitored residential electricity demand. / Suomalainen, Kiti; Eyers, David; Ford, Rebecca; Stephenson, Janet; Anderson, Ben; Jack, Michael.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 183, 15.01.2019, p. 418-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Detailed comparison of energy-related time-use diaries and monitored residential electricity demand

AU - Suomalainen, Kiti

AU - Eyers, David

AU - Ford, Rebecca

AU - Stephenson, Janet

AU - Anderson, Ben

AU - Jack, Michael

PY - 2019/1/15

Y1 - 2019/1/15

N2 - Understanding demand flexibility in the residential sector depends on understanding the causal link between household occupants’ activities and resulting electricity demand. Self-reported electricity use via time-use diaries is often used as a direct descriptor of occupants’ activities and has been integrated into residential electricity demand simulation models. Conversely, smart meter electricity demand data is increasingly used to infer occupants’ activities. Underlying both these approaches are a number of unverified assumptions about people’s perceptions of their energy use, the accuracy with which they report these activities and the physical operation of electrical devices. This paper carries out a comparison between self-reported energy-related activities and monitored electricity demand in 15 households over a week-long time period, with focus on electric hot water cylinders and heat pumps as appliances with large potential for demand flexibility. This comparison quantifies the extent to which self-reported activity is a predictor of electricity demand and conversely, whether electricity demand can accurately identify occupant activity. Results show that, although there is significant variation across households, self-reported activity tends to be a reasonably good predictor of electricity demand. However, due to the intervention of thermostat-controlled devices, electricity demand is not a good indicator of occupant activity.

AB - Understanding demand flexibility in the residential sector depends on understanding the causal link between household occupants’ activities and resulting electricity demand. Self-reported electricity use via time-use diaries is often used as a direct descriptor of occupants’ activities and has been integrated into residential electricity demand simulation models. Conversely, smart meter electricity demand data is increasingly used to infer occupants’ activities. Underlying both these approaches are a number of unverified assumptions about people’s perceptions of their energy use, the accuracy with which they report these activities and the physical operation of electrical devices. This paper carries out a comparison between self-reported energy-related activities and monitored electricity demand in 15 households over a week-long time period, with focus on electric hot water cylinders and heat pumps as appliances with large potential for demand flexibility. This comparison quantifies the extent to which self-reported activity is a predictor of electricity demand and conversely, whether electricity demand can accurately identify occupant activity. Results show that, although there is significant variation across households, self-reported activity tends to be a reasonably good predictor of electricity demand. However, due to the intervention of thermostat-controlled devices, electricity demand is not a good indicator of occupant activity.

KW - time-use diary

KW - residential electricity demand

KW - demand flexibility

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/energy-and-buildings

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.002

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.002

M3 - Article

VL - 183

SP - 418

EP - 427

JO - Energy and Buildings

T2 - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

ER -