Desistance, rehabilitation and correctionalism: developments and prospects in Scotland

F. McNeill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article argues that desistance research should provoke a reconsideration of the essential character of interventions with adults involved in offending behaviour. It begins by discussing broad accounts of the characteristics of late-modern penal systems as the background to an exploration of current developments in probation policy and practice. In particular, the discussion develops some contrasts between ‘welfarist rehabilitation’ and ‘correctional treatment’ as competing (but inadequate) paradigms for probation practice. In the context of these contrasts, the situation of criminal justice social work in post-devolution Scotland receives particular attention. Possible implications for practice of some important desistance studies are then developed, in order to stimulate discussion and debate about the extent to which desistance research might challenge the correctionalism that is emerging in probation policy and practice in the UK. In the conclusion, bearing in mind proposed organisational changes on both sides of the border that might tend towards advancing correctionalism, the prospects for more constructive developments in Scotland are considered in the light of emerging evidence about the views of frontline workers and in the light of existing ‘official’ objectives for criminal justice social work.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages420-436
    Number of pages17
    JournalThe Howard Journal of Crime and Justice
    Volume43
    Issue number4
    Early online date11 Aug 2004
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2004

    Fingerprint

    rehabilitation
    probation
    social work
    justice
    organizational change
    decentralization
    paradigm
    worker
    evidence

    Cite this

    @article{a31cdc558bf243e9830c5058a87173a8,
    title = "Desistance, rehabilitation and correctionalism: developments and prospects in Scotland",
    abstract = "This article argues that desistance research should provoke a reconsideration of the essential character of interventions with adults involved in offending behaviour. It begins by discussing broad accounts of the characteristics of late-modern penal systems as the background to an exploration of current developments in probation policy and practice. In particular, the discussion develops some contrasts between ‘welfarist rehabilitation’ and ‘correctional treatment’ as competing (but inadequate) paradigms for probation practice. In the context of these contrasts, the situation of criminal justice social work in post-devolution Scotland receives particular attention. Possible implications for practice of some important desistance studies are then developed, in order to stimulate discussion and debate about the extent to which desistance research might challenge the correctionalism that is emerging in probation policy and practice in the UK. In the conclusion, bearing in mind proposed organisational changes on both sides of the border that might tend towards advancing correctionalism, the prospects for more constructive developments in Scotland are considered in the light of emerging evidence about the views of frontline workers and in the light of existing ‘official’ objectives for criminal justice social work.",
    author = "F. McNeill",
    year = "2004",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00339.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "43",
    pages = "420--436",
    journal = "The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice",
    issn = "0265-5527",
    number = "4",

    }

    Desistance, rehabilitation and correctionalism : developments and prospects in Scotland. / McNeill, F.

    In: The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, Vol. 43, No. 4, 09.2004, p. 420-436.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Desistance, rehabilitation and correctionalism

    T2 - The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice

    AU - McNeill, F.

    PY - 2004/9

    Y1 - 2004/9

    N2 - This article argues that desistance research should provoke a reconsideration of the essential character of interventions with adults involved in offending behaviour. It begins by discussing broad accounts of the characteristics of late-modern penal systems as the background to an exploration of current developments in probation policy and practice. In particular, the discussion develops some contrasts between ‘welfarist rehabilitation’ and ‘correctional treatment’ as competing (but inadequate) paradigms for probation practice. In the context of these contrasts, the situation of criminal justice social work in post-devolution Scotland receives particular attention. Possible implications for practice of some important desistance studies are then developed, in order to stimulate discussion and debate about the extent to which desistance research might challenge the correctionalism that is emerging in probation policy and practice in the UK. In the conclusion, bearing in mind proposed organisational changes on both sides of the border that might tend towards advancing correctionalism, the prospects for more constructive developments in Scotland are considered in the light of emerging evidence about the views of frontline workers and in the light of existing ‘official’ objectives for criminal justice social work.

    AB - This article argues that desistance research should provoke a reconsideration of the essential character of interventions with adults involved in offending behaviour. It begins by discussing broad accounts of the characteristics of late-modern penal systems as the background to an exploration of current developments in probation policy and practice. In particular, the discussion develops some contrasts between ‘welfarist rehabilitation’ and ‘correctional treatment’ as competing (but inadequate) paradigms for probation practice. In the context of these contrasts, the situation of criminal justice social work in post-devolution Scotland receives particular attention. Possible implications for practice of some important desistance studies are then developed, in order to stimulate discussion and debate about the extent to which desistance research might challenge the correctionalism that is emerging in probation policy and practice in the UK. In the conclusion, bearing in mind proposed organisational changes on both sides of the border that might tend towards advancing correctionalism, the prospects for more constructive developments in Scotland are considered in the light of emerging evidence about the views of frontline workers and in the light of existing ‘official’ objectives for criminal justice social work.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00339.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00339.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 43

    SP - 420

    EP - 436

    JO - The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice

    JF - The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice

    SN - 0265-5527

    IS - 4

    ER -