Delivering theory courses in architecture

inquiry based, active, and experiential learning integrated

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

166 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Advocating the integration of interactive learning mechanisms into theory courses in architecture, this paper responds to the misconceptions that continue to characterize the delivery of knowledge content in architectural courses. Such misconceptions are identified as: a) science as a body of knowledge versus science as a method of exploration, b) learning theories about the phenomena versus getting the feel of the behavior of the phenomena, and c) the real versus the hypothetical. Based on reviewing the literature on pedagogy the paper explores the value and benefits of introducing active and experiential and inquiry-based learning (IBL) in theory courses in architecture. A framework is developed and employed to demonstrate the way in which these types of learning can be incorporated. The development and implementation of a series of in-class and off campus exercises in two different contexts reveal that structured actions and experiences help students to be in control over their learning while invigorating their understanding of the body of knowledge delivered in a typical lecture format.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-295
Number of pages18
JournalArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research
Volume4
Issue number2-3
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2010

Fingerprint

learning
Students
learning theory
science
knowledge
student
Problem-Based Learning
Values
experience

Keywords

  • architectural education
  • inquiry-based learning (IBL)
  • experiental learning
  • active learning

Cite this

@article{b199fb9d77204bd6a1c0b7dad254d5ce,
title = "Delivering theory courses in architecture: inquiry based, active, and experiential learning integrated",
abstract = "Advocating the integration of interactive learning mechanisms into theory courses in architecture, this paper responds to the misconceptions that continue to characterize the delivery of knowledge content in architectural courses. Such misconceptions are identified as: a) science as a body of knowledge versus science as a method of exploration, b) learning theories about the phenomena versus getting the feel of the behavior of the phenomena, and c) the real versus the hypothetical. Based on reviewing the literature on pedagogy the paper explores the value and benefits of introducing active and experiential and inquiry-based learning (IBL) in theory courses in architecture. A framework is developed and employed to demonstrate the way in which these types of learning can be incorporated. The development and implementation of a series of in-class and off campus exercises in two different contexts reveal that structured actions and experiences help students to be in control over their learning while invigorating their understanding of the body of knowledge delivered in a typical lecture format.",
keywords = "architectural education, inquiry-based learning (IBL) , experiental learning, active learning",
author = "Salama, {Ashraf M}",
note = "Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research 2010. Available in the public domain - can be viewed and downloaded by the public without restrictions.",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "278--295",
journal = "ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research",
issn = "1938-7806",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Delivering theory courses in architecture

T2 - inquiry based, active, and experiential learning integrated

AU - Salama, Ashraf M

N1 - Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research 2010. Available in the public domain - can be viewed and downloaded by the public without restrictions.

PY - 2010/7

Y1 - 2010/7

N2 - Advocating the integration of interactive learning mechanisms into theory courses in architecture, this paper responds to the misconceptions that continue to characterize the delivery of knowledge content in architectural courses. Such misconceptions are identified as: a) science as a body of knowledge versus science as a method of exploration, b) learning theories about the phenomena versus getting the feel of the behavior of the phenomena, and c) the real versus the hypothetical. Based on reviewing the literature on pedagogy the paper explores the value and benefits of introducing active and experiential and inquiry-based learning (IBL) in theory courses in architecture. A framework is developed and employed to demonstrate the way in which these types of learning can be incorporated. The development and implementation of a series of in-class and off campus exercises in two different contexts reveal that structured actions and experiences help students to be in control over their learning while invigorating their understanding of the body of knowledge delivered in a typical lecture format.

AB - Advocating the integration of interactive learning mechanisms into theory courses in architecture, this paper responds to the misconceptions that continue to characterize the delivery of knowledge content in architectural courses. Such misconceptions are identified as: a) science as a body of knowledge versus science as a method of exploration, b) learning theories about the phenomena versus getting the feel of the behavior of the phenomena, and c) the real versus the hypothetical. Based on reviewing the literature on pedagogy the paper explores the value and benefits of introducing active and experiential and inquiry-based learning (IBL) in theory courses in architecture. A framework is developed and employed to demonstrate the way in which these types of learning can be incorporated. The development and implementation of a series of in-class and off campus exercises in two different contexts reveal that structured actions and experiences help students to be in control over their learning while invigorating their understanding of the body of knowledge delivered in a typical lecture format.

KW - architectural education

KW - inquiry-based learning (IBL)

KW - experiental learning

KW - active learning

UR - http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/download/111/119

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 278

EP - 295

JO - ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research

JF - ArchNet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research

SN - 1938-7806

IS - 2-3

ER -