Defining violation: sex-worker experiences of unwanted incidents

Barbara G. Brents, Chris Wakefield, Jane Scoular, Teela Sanders*, Gillian Abel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter explores two primary questions: What range of unwanted contact incidents do sex workers most frequently encounter? Moreover, how does the law influence their understanding, interpretation, and definition of these incidents? We highlight the concept of transactional legal consciousness, distinguishing it from rape consciousness, to explain how sex workers perceive violations within the negotiated context of selling sex. The chapter analyses qualitative and quantitative data on common types of violations, such as payment issues and stealthing, and less common violations involving injury. It also examines the role of legal alienation in shaping sex workers’ responses. The chapter first defines and categorises types of violations, then explores sex workers’ perceptions and interpretations, and finally discusses the implications of transactional legal consciousness in managing these experiences.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationVoicing Consent
Subtitle of host publicationSex Workers, Sexual Violation and Legal Consciousness in Cross-National Contexts
EditorsTeela Sanders, Jane Scoular, Barbara G. Brents, Susie Balderston, Gillian Abel
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd.
Chapter4
Pages79-116
Number of pages38
ISBN (Electronic)9783031777158
ISBN (Print)9783031777141, 9783031777172
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • human rights
  • rape
  • consent
  • safe sex
  • social policy
  • stigma
  • regulating sex work
  • sexual assault
  • harrassment
  • whorephobia
  • victimology
  • public health
  • decriminalisation of sex work

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining violation: sex-worker experiences of unwanted incidents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this