Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised

Robert Elliott, Christine M. Fox, Svetlana A. Beltyukova, Gregory E. Stone, Jennifer Gunderson, Xi Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)
121 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Rasch analysis was used to illustrate the usefulness of item-level analyses for evaluating a common therapy outcome measure of general clinical distress, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1994). Using complementary therapy research samples, the instrument's 5-point rating scale was found to exceed clients' ability to make reliable discriminations and could be improved by collapsing it into a 3-point version (combining scale points 1 with 2 and 3 with 4). This revision, in addition to removing 3 misfitting items, increased person separation from 4.90 to 5.07 and item separation from 7.76 to 8.52 (resulting in alphas of .96 and .99, respectively). Some SCL-90-R subscales had low internal consistency reliabilities; SCL-90-R items can be used to define one factor of general clinical distress that is generally stable across both samples, with two small residual factors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-372
Number of pages13
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Checklist
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Rasch analysis
  • therapy
  • clinical distress
  • psychotherapy
  • social psychology

Cite this

Elliott, Robert ; Fox, Christine M. ; Beltyukova, Svetlana A. ; Stone, Gregory E. ; Gunderson, Jennifer ; Zhang, Xi. / Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. In: Psychological Assessment. 2006 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 359-372.
@article{2bc40f5d738e47b2be48b248c42451ae,
title = "Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised",
abstract = "Rasch analysis was used to illustrate the usefulness of item-level analyses for evaluating a common therapy outcome measure of general clinical distress, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1994). Using complementary therapy research samples, the instrument's 5-point rating scale was found to exceed clients' ability to make reliable discriminations and could be improved by collapsing it into a 3-point version (combining scale points 1 with 2 and 3 with 4). This revision, in addition to removing 3 misfitting items, increased person separation from 4.90 to 5.07 and item separation from 7.76 to 8.52 (resulting in alphas of .96 and .99, respectively). Some SCL-90-R subscales had low internal consistency reliabilities; SCL-90-R items can be used to define one factor of general clinical distress that is generally stable across both samples, with two small residual factors.",
keywords = "Rasch analysis, therapy, clinical distress, psychotherapy, social psychology",
author = "Robert Elliott and Fox, {Christine M.} and Beltyukova, {Svetlana A.} and Stone, {Gregory E.} and Jennifer Gunderson and Xi Zhang",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.359",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "359--372",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
number = "4",

}

Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. / Elliott, Robert; Fox, Christine M.; Beltyukova, Svetlana A.; Stone, Gregory E.; Gunderson, Jennifer; Zhang, Xi.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 18, No. 4, 12.2006, p. 359-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised

AU - Elliott, Robert

AU - Fox, Christine M.

AU - Beltyukova, Svetlana A.

AU - Stone, Gregory E.

AU - Gunderson, Jennifer

AU - Zhang, Xi

PY - 2006/12

Y1 - 2006/12

N2 - Rasch analysis was used to illustrate the usefulness of item-level analyses for evaluating a common therapy outcome measure of general clinical distress, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1994). Using complementary therapy research samples, the instrument's 5-point rating scale was found to exceed clients' ability to make reliable discriminations and could be improved by collapsing it into a 3-point version (combining scale points 1 with 2 and 3 with 4). This revision, in addition to removing 3 misfitting items, increased person separation from 4.90 to 5.07 and item separation from 7.76 to 8.52 (resulting in alphas of .96 and .99, respectively). Some SCL-90-R subscales had low internal consistency reliabilities; SCL-90-R items can be used to define one factor of general clinical distress that is generally stable across both samples, with two small residual factors.

AB - Rasch analysis was used to illustrate the usefulness of item-level analyses for evaluating a common therapy outcome measure of general clinical distress, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R; Derogatis, 1994). Using complementary therapy research samples, the instrument's 5-point rating scale was found to exceed clients' ability to make reliable discriminations and could be improved by collapsing it into a 3-point version (combining scale points 1 with 2 and 3 with 4). This revision, in addition to removing 3 misfitting items, increased person separation from 4.90 to 5.07 and item separation from 7.76 to 8.52 (resulting in alphas of .96 and .99, respectively). Some SCL-90-R subscales had low internal consistency reliabilities; SCL-90-R items can be used to define one factor of general clinical distress that is generally stable across both samples, with two small residual factors.

KW - Rasch analysis

KW - therapy

KW - clinical distress

KW - psychotherapy

KW - social psychology

U2 - 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.359

DO - 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.359

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 359

EP - 372

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 4

ER -