Deconstructing the conservancy map

Hxaro, N!ore, and Rhizomes in the Kalahari

Saskia Vermeylen, Gemma Davies, Dan van der Horst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To stand a chance of reclaiming their pre-colonial rights, indigenous peoples often have to deploy the tools and logic of the colonial state. Through a case study of community conservancy in Namibia, we demonstrate that the same holds for the practice of participatory mapping. We engage with J.B. Harley's deconstruction of maps and use our ethnographic data to reveal the silences and lies inherent in the rigid cartographic representations of conservancy maps. The indigenous peoples in our case study are the San, who have been marginalized and displaced from their land. We highlight how these people, once perceived by the colonialists as “rootless,” do have strong relational connections across the landscape. We argue that the practice of counter-mapping, along with its critique, is incomplete without full attention to the silences of the map and the relational rhizomes (across boundaries) of the peoples involved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-134
Number of pages14
JournalCartographica
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

rhizome
Namibia
community
ore

Keywords

  • land rights
  • indigeneity
  • participatory GIS
  • counter-mapping
  • narratives

Cite this

Vermeylen, Saskia ; Davies, Gemma ; van der Horst, Dan. / Deconstructing the conservancy map : Hxaro, N!ore, and Rhizomes in the Kalahari. In: Cartographica. 2012 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 121-134.
@article{21dd5772b4fa40d2bcb6d6339183e0b2,
title = "Deconstructing the conservancy map: Hxaro, N!ore, and Rhizomes in the Kalahari",
abstract = "To stand a chance of reclaiming their pre-colonial rights, indigenous peoples often have to deploy the tools and logic of the colonial state. Through a case study of community conservancy in Namibia, we demonstrate that the same holds for the practice of participatory mapping. We engage with J.B. Harley's deconstruction of maps and use our ethnographic data to reveal the silences and lies inherent in the rigid cartographic representations of conservancy maps. The indigenous peoples in our case study are the San, who have been marginalized and displaced from their land. We highlight how these people, once perceived by the colonialists as “rootless,” do have strong relational connections across the landscape. We argue that the practice of counter-mapping, along with its critique, is incomplete without full attention to the silences of the map and the relational rhizomes (across boundaries) of the peoples involved.",
keywords = "land rights, indigeneity, participatory GIS, counter-mapping, narratives",
author = "Saskia Vermeylen and Gemma Davies and {van der Horst}, Dan",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.3138/carto.47.2.121",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "121--134",
journal = "Cartographica",
issn = "0317-7173",
number = "2",

}

Deconstructing the conservancy map : Hxaro, N!ore, and Rhizomes in the Kalahari. / Vermeylen, Saskia; Davies, Gemma; van der Horst, Dan.

In: Cartographica, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2012, p. 121-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deconstructing the conservancy map

T2 - Hxaro, N!ore, and Rhizomes in the Kalahari

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

AU - Davies, Gemma

AU - van der Horst, Dan

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - To stand a chance of reclaiming their pre-colonial rights, indigenous peoples often have to deploy the tools and logic of the colonial state. Through a case study of community conservancy in Namibia, we demonstrate that the same holds for the practice of participatory mapping. We engage with J.B. Harley's deconstruction of maps and use our ethnographic data to reveal the silences and lies inherent in the rigid cartographic representations of conservancy maps. The indigenous peoples in our case study are the San, who have been marginalized and displaced from their land. We highlight how these people, once perceived by the colonialists as “rootless,” do have strong relational connections across the landscape. We argue that the practice of counter-mapping, along with its critique, is incomplete without full attention to the silences of the map and the relational rhizomes (across boundaries) of the peoples involved.

AB - To stand a chance of reclaiming their pre-colonial rights, indigenous peoples often have to deploy the tools and logic of the colonial state. Through a case study of community conservancy in Namibia, we demonstrate that the same holds for the practice of participatory mapping. We engage with J.B. Harley's deconstruction of maps and use our ethnographic data to reveal the silences and lies inherent in the rigid cartographic representations of conservancy maps. The indigenous peoples in our case study are the San, who have been marginalized and displaced from their land. We highlight how these people, once perceived by the colonialists as “rootless,” do have strong relational connections across the landscape. We argue that the practice of counter-mapping, along with its critique, is incomplete without full attention to the silences of the map and the relational rhizomes (across boundaries) of the peoples involved.

KW - land rights

KW - indigeneity

KW - participatory GIS

KW - counter-mapping

KW - narratives

U2 - 10.3138/carto.47.2.121

DO - 10.3138/carto.47.2.121

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 121

EP - 134

JO - Cartographica

JF - Cartographica

SN - 0317-7173

IS - 2

ER -