Decision rules for allocation of finances to health systems strengthening

Alexander Morton, Ranjeeta Thomas, Peter C. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A key dilemma in global health is how to allocate funds between disease-specific "vertical projects" on the one hand and "horizontal programmes" which aim to strengthen the entire health system on the other. While economic evaluation provides a way of approaching the prioritisation of vertical projects, it provides less guidance on how to prioritise between horizontal and vertical spending. We approach this problem by formulating a mathematical program which captures the complementary benefits of funding both vertical projects and horizontal programmes. We show that our solution to this math program has an appealing intuitive structure. We illustrate our model by computationally solving two specialised versions of this problem, with illustrations based on the problem of allocating funding for infectious diseases in sub–Saharan Africa. We conclude by reflecting on how such a model may be developed in the future and used to guide empirical data collection and theory development.
LanguageEnglish
Pages97-108
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Health Economics
Volume49
Early online date24 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Africa South of the Sahara
Financial Management
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Communicable Diseases
Health
Global Health
Decision rules
Finance
Funding

Keywords

  • health systems strengthening
  • HSS
  • vertical projects
  • horizontal programmes

Cite this

@article{82abd7d698aa4252a5f0a93b97f40229,
title = "Decision rules for allocation of finances to health systems strengthening",
abstract = "A key dilemma in global health is how to allocate funds between disease-specific {"}vertical projects{"} on the one hand and {"}horizontal programmes{"} which aim to strengthen the entire health system on the other. While economic evaluation provides a way of approaching the prioritisation of vertical projects, it provides less guidance on how to prioritise between horizontal and vertical spending. We approach this problem by formulating a mathematical program which captures the complementary benefits of funding both vertical projects and horizontal programmes. We show that our solution to this math program has an appealing intuitive structure. We illustrate our model by computationally solving two specialised versions of this problem, with illustrations based on the problem of allocating funding for infectious diseases in sub–Saharan Africa. We conclude by reflecting on how such a model may be developed in the future and used to guide empirical data collection and theory development.",
keywords = "health systems strengthening, HSS, vertical projects, horizontal programmes",
author = "Alexander Morton and Ranjeeta Thomas and Smith, {Peter C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.001",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "97--108",
journal = "Journal of Health Economics",
issn = "0167-6296",

}

Decision rules for allocation of finances to health systems strengthening. / Morton, Alexander; Thomas, Ranjeeta; Smith, Peter C.

In: Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 49, 24.06.2016, p. 97-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision rules for allocation of finances to health systems strengthening

AU - Morton, Alexander

AU - Thomas, Ranjeeta

AU - Smith, Peter C.

PY - 2016/6/24

Y1 - 2016/6/24

N2 - A key dilemma in global health is how to allocate funds between disease-specific "vertical projects" on the one hand and "horizontal programmes" which aim to strengthen the entire health system on the other. While economic evaluation provides a way of approaching the prioritisation of vertical projects, it provides less guidance on how to prioritise between horizontal and vertical spending. We approach this problem by formulating a mathematical program which captures the complementary benefits of funding both vertical projects and horizontal programmes. We show that our solution to this math program has an appealing intuitive structure. We illustrate our model by computationally solving two specialised versions of this problem, with illustrations based on the problem of allocating funding for infectious diseases in sub–Saharan Africa. We conclude by reflecting on how such a model may be developed in the future and used to guide empirical data collection and theory development.

AB - A key dilemma in global health is how to allocate funds between disease-specific "vertical projects" on the one hand and "horizontal programmes" which aim to strengthen the entire health system on the other. While economic evaluation provides a way of approaching the prioritisation of vertical projects, it provides less guidance on how to prioritise between horizontal and vertical spending. We approach this problem by formulating a mathematical program which captures the complementary benefits of funding both vertical projects and horizontal programmes. We show that our solution to this math program has an appealing intuitive structure. We illustrate our model by computationally solving two specialised versions of this problem, with illustrations based on the problem of allocating funding for infectious diseases in sub–Saharan Africa. We conclude by reflecting on how such a model may be developed in the future and used to guide empirical data collection and theory development.

KW - health systems strengthening

KW - HSS

KW - vertical projects

KW - horizontal programmes

UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01676296

U2 - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.001

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 97

EP - 108

JO - Journal of Health Economics

T2 - Journal of Health Economics

JF - Journal of Health Economics

SN - 0167-6296

ER -