Abstract
In this paper we review and analyse scenario planning as an aid to anticipation of the future under conditions of low predictability. We examine how successful the method is in mitigating issues to do with inappropriate framing, cognitive and motivational bias, and inappropriate attributions of causality. Although we demonstrate that the scenario method contains weaknesses, we identify a potential for improvement. Four general principles that should help to enhance the role of scenario planning when predictability is low are discussed: (i) challenging mental frames, (ii) understanding human motivations, (iii) augmenting scenario planning through adopting the approach of crisis management, and (iv) assessing the flexibility, diversity, and insurability of strategic options in a structured option-against-scenario evaluation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 813-825 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | International Journal of Forecasting |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2009 |
Keywords
- decision making
- planning
- low levels
- predictability
- scenario method