Dangerous education: the occupational hazards of 'transgender education'

Ellis Morgan, Yvette Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article sets out the ways in which primary schools have come to bear significant risks in making decisions over whether, how and when to reflect transgender issues. We examine press reporting that arose in relation to a recent incident in the UK in which a primary school in East Sussex was widely criticised for instigating such a ‘transgender education’ initiative. We argue that despite tacit indications that UK government supports ‘transgender education’ as a learning area for children as young as five years old, there is an ongoing risk to primary schools who implement such initiatives. The nature of this risk is located within the usage of equalities terminology within governmental discussions and official guidance that effectively acts to gloss over the enduringly controversial nature of transgender issues. The vague and non-specific nature of equalities terminology allows for both heteronormative and transgressive interpretation, thereby locating the risk of public criticism with primary schools, and headteachers in particular.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages23
JournalSociology
Early online date31 Jan 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 31 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

primary school
technical language
equality
education
gloss
indication
incident
criticism
decision making
interpretation
learning

Keywords

  • education
  • equalities
  • gender
  • teachers
  • transgender
  • primary school

Cite this

@article{bc6bcf2e8a154bef981bbfa962e133e7,
title = "Dangerous education: the occupational hazards of 'transgender education'",
abstract = "This article sets out the ways in which primary schools have come to bear significant risks in making decisions over whether, how and when to reflect transgender issues. We examine press reporting that arose in relation to a recent incident in the UK in which a primary school in East Sussex was widely criticised for instigating such a ‘transgender education’ initiative. We argue that despite tacit indications that UK government supports ‘transgender education’ as a learning area for children as young as five years old, there is an ongoing risk to primary schools who implement such initiatives. The nature of this risk is located within the usage of equalities terminology within governmental discussions and official guidance that effectively acts to gloss over the enduringly controversial nature of transgender issues. The vague and non-specific nature of equalities terminology allows for both heteronormative and transgressive interpretation, thereby locating the risk of public criticism with primary schools, and headteachers in particular.",
keywords = "education, equalities, gender, teachers, transgender , primary school",
author = "Ellis Morgan and Yvette Taylor",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177/0038038517746052",
language = "English",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",

}

Dangerous education : the occupational hazards of 'transgender education'. / Morgan, Ellis; Taylor, Yvette.

In: Sociology, 31.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dangerous education

T2 - Sociology

AU - Morgan,Ellis

AU - Taylor,Yvette

PY - 2018/1/31

Y1 - 2018/1/31

N2 - This article sets out the ways in which primary schools have come to bear significant risks in making decisions over whether, how and when to reflect transgender issues. We examine press reporting that arose in relation to a recent incident in the UK in which a primary school in East Sussex was widely criticised for instigating such a ‘transgender education’ initiative. We argue that despite tacit indications that UK government supports ‘transgender education’ as a learning area for children as young as five years old, there is an ongoing risk to primary schools who implement such initiatives. The nature of this risk is located within the usage of equalities terminology within governmental discussions and official guidance that effectively acts to gloss over the enduringly controversial nature of transgender issues. The vague and non-specific nature of equalities terminology allows for both heteronormative and transgressive interpretation, thereby locating the risk of public criticism with primary schools, and headteachers in particular.

AB - This article sets out the ways in which primary schools have come to bear significant risks in making decisions over whether, how and when to reflect transgender issues. We examine press reporting that arose in relation to a recent incident in the UK in which a primary school in East Sussex was widely criticised for instigating such a ‘transgender education’ initiative. We argue that despite tacit indications that UK government supports ‘transgender education’ as a learning area for children as young as five years old, there is an ongoing risk to primary schools who implement such initiatives. The nature of this risk is located within the usage of equalities terminology within governmental discussions and official guidance that effectively acts to gloss over the enduringly controversial nature of transgender issues. The vague and non-specific nature of equalities terminology allows for both heteronormative and transgressive interpretation, thereby locating the risk of public criticism with primary schools, and headteachers in particular.

KW - education

KW - equalities

KW - gender

KW - teachers

KW - transgender

KW - primary school

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/home/soc

U2 - 10.1177/0038038517746052

DO - 10.1177/0038038517746052

M3 - Article

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

ER -