Cyclic CO2 – H2O injection and residual trapping: implications for CO2 injection efficiency and storage security

K. Edlmann, S. Hinchliffe, N. Heinemann, G. Johnson, J. Ennis-King, C. I. McDermott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

To meet the Paris Agreement target of limiting global warming to 2 °C or below it is widely accepted that Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) will have to be deployed at scale. For the first time, experiments have been undertaken over six cycles of water and supercritical CO2 injection using a state of the art high flow rig recreating in-situ conditions of near wellbore injection into analogue storage reservoir rocks. The results show that differential pressure continuously increases over multiple injection cycles. Our interpretation is that multiple cycles of injection result in a reduced effective permeability due to increased residual trapping acting as a barrier to flow resulting in reduced injectivity. This is supported by numerical modelling and field observations that show CO2 injectivity and its variation over time will be affected by multiple cycles of injection. These results suggest that loss of injectivity must be incorporated into the injection strategy and that careful management of cyclic injection will create the opportunity to increase residual trapping.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1-9
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Volume80
Early online date24 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Analog storage
Carbon capture
Global warming
trapping
Rocks
reservoir rock
Water
global warming
Experiments
permeability
carbon
modeling
experiment
water

Keywords

  • CO2
  • CO2 storage
  • cyclic CO2 injection
  • injection cycles
  • residual trapping
  • supercritical CO2

Cite this

@article{70161f150aee4b7a942185049335cfa0,
title = "Cyclic CO2 – H2O injection and residual trapping: implications for CO2 injection efficiency and storage security",
abstract = "To meet the Paris Agreement target of limiting global warming to 2 °C or below it is widely accepted that Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) will have to be deployed at scale. For the first time, experiments have been undertaken over six cycles of water and supercritical CO2 injection using a state of the art high flow rig recreating in-situ conditions of near wellbore injection into analogue storage reservoir rocks. The results show that differential pressure continuously increases over multiple injection cycles. Our interpretation is that multiple cycles of injection result in a reduced effective permeability due to increased residual trapping acting as a barrier to flow resulting in reduced injectivity. This is supported by numerical modelling and field observations that show CO2 injectivity and its variation over time will be affected by multiple cycles of injection. These results suggest that loss of injectivity must be incorporated into the injection strategy and that careful management of cyclic injection will create the opportunity to increase residual trapping.",
keywords = "CO2, CO2 storage, cyclic CO2 injection, injection cycles, residual trapping, supercritical CO2",
author = "K. Edlmann and S. Hinchliffe and N. Heinemann and G. Johnson and J. Ennis-King and McDermott, {C. I.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.11.009",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control",
issn = "1750-5836",

}

Cyclic CO2 – H2O injection and residual trapping : implications for CO2 injection efficiency and storage security. / Edlmann, K.; Hinchliffe, S.; Heinemann, N.; Johnson, G.; Ennis-King, J.; McDermott, C. I.

In: International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control , Vol. 80, 31.01.2019, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cyclic CO2 – H2O injection and residual trapping

T2 - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

AU - Edlmann, K.

AU - Hinchliffe, S.

AU - Heinemann, N.

AU - Johnson, G.

AU - Ennis-King, J.

AU - McDermott, C. I.

PY - 2019/1/31

Y1 - 2019/1/31

N2 - To meet the Paris Agreement target of limiting global warming to 2 °C or below it is widely accepted that Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) will have to be deployed at scale. For the first time, experiments have been undertaken over six cycles of water and supercritical CO2 injection using a state of the art high flow rig recreating in-situ conditions of near wellbore injection into analogue storage reservoir rocks. The results show that differential pressure continuously increases over multiple injection cycles. Our interpretation is that multiple cycles of injection result in a reduced effective permeability due to increased residual trapping acting as a barrier to flow resulting in reduced injectivity. This is supported by numerical modelling and field observations that show CO2 injectivity and its variation over time will be affected by multiple cycles of injection. These results suggest that loss of injectivity must be incorporated into the injection strategy and that careful management of cyclic injection will create the opportunity to increase residual trapping.

AB - To meet the Paris Agreement target of limiting global warming to 2 °C or below it is widely accepted that Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) will have to be deployed at scale. For the first time, experiments have been undertaken over six cycles of water and supercritical CO2 injection using a state of the art high flow rig recreating in-situ conditions of near wellbore injection into analogue storage reservoir rocks. The results show that differential pressure continuously increases over multiple injection cycles. Our interpretation is that multiple cycles of injection result in a reduced effective permeability due to increased residual trapping acting as a barrier to flow resulting in reduced injectivity. This is supported by numerical modelling and field observations that show CO2 injectivity and its variation over time will be affected by multiple cycles of injection. These results suggest that loss of injectivity must be incorporated into the injection strategy and that careful management of cyclic injection will create the opportunity to increase residual trapping.

KW - CO2

KW - CO2 storage

KW - cyclic CO2 injection

KW - injection cycles

KW - residual trapping

KW - supercritical CO2

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057103134&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/cyclic-co2--h2o-injection-and-residual-trapping-implications-for-co2-injection-efficiency-and-storage-security(aea8f8dd-1e7d-42d5-968f-4adc61be4bcc).html

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.11.009

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

JF - International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

SN - 1750-5836

ER -