Crying, moving, and keeping it whole: what makes literary description vivid?

Elspeth Jajdelska, Christopher Butler, Steve Kelly, Allan McNeill, Katie Overy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Vividness is used in a range of senses which often conflate the intensity of an experience with the accuracy of mental images. In this article we consider the vividness of responses to literary descriptions of faces in the light of the psychology of face perception and the neuroscience of the mirror neuron system. We distinguish between intensity of experience and accuracy of mental images and compare two models of reader response to descriptions: the jigsaw model (the reader constructs a mental image from items of verbal information) and the experiential model (the reader has an emotional, embodied, and holistic response). We predict which aspects of facial description will provoke a vivid response in the experiential sense and discuss examples of literary descriptions of faces in the light of these predictions. We conclude with an illustration of how these insights can be used in literary history and interpretation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages433-463
Number of pages31
JournalPoetics Today: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Mental Image
Vividness
Reader
Literary Interpretation
Face Perception
Literary History
Neuroscience
Prediction
Mirror Neurons
Emotion
Reader Response
Psychology

Keywords

  • mirror-neuron system
  • face recognition
  • ekphrarsis
  • imagery
  • construction
  • empathy
  • future
  • memory
  • common

Cite this

@article{66333c2a7651443d92eaabcdc954383b,
title = "Crying, moving, and keeping it whole: what makes literary description vivid?",
abstract = "Vividness is used in a range of senses which often conflate the intensity of an experience with the accuracy of mental images. In this article we consider the vividness of responses to literary descriptions of faces in the light of the psychology of face perception and the neuroscience of the mirror neuron system. We distinguish between intensity of experience and accuracy of mental images and compare two models of reader response to descriptions: the jigsaw model (the reader constructs a mental image from items of verbal information) and the experiential model (the reader has an emotional, embodied, and holistic response). We predict which aspects of facial description will provoke a vivid response in the experiential sense and discuss examples of literary descriptions of faces in the light of these predictions. We conclude with an illustration of how these insights can be used in literary history and interpretation.",
keywords = "mirror-neuron system, face recognition, ekphrarsis, imagery, construction, empathy, future, memory, common",
author = "Elspeth Jajdelska and Christopher Butler and Steve Kelly and Allan McNeill and Katie Overy",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1215/03335372-2010-002",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "433--463",
journal = "Poetics Today: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication",
issn = "0333-5372",
number = "3",

}

Crying, moving, and keeping it whole : what makes literary description vivid? / Jajdelska, Elspeth; Butler, Christopher; Kelly, Steve; McNeill, Allan; Overy, Katie.

In: Poetics Today: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication , Vol. 31, No. 3, 2010, p. 433-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crying, moving, and keeping it whole

T2 - Poetics Today: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication

AU - Jajdelska, Elspeth

AU - Butler, Christopher

AU - Kelly, Steve

AU - McNeill, Allan

AU - Overy, Katie

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Vividness is used in a range of senses which often conflate the intensity of an experience with the accuracy of mental images. In this article we consider the vividness of responses to literary descriptions of faces in the light of the psychology of face perception and the neuroscience of the mirror neuron system. We distinguish between intensity of experience and accuracy of mental images and compare two models of reader response to descriptions: the jigsaw model (the reader constructs a mental image from items of verbal information) and the experiential model (the reader has an emotional, embodied, and holistic response). We predict which aspects of facial description will provoke a vivid response in the experiential sense and discuss examples of literary descriptions of faces in the light of these predictions. We conclude with an illustration of how these insights can be used in literary history and interpretation.

AB - Vividness is used in a range of senses which often conflate the intensity of an experience with the accuracy of mental images. In this article we consider the vividness of responses to literary descriptions of faces in the light of the psychology of face perception and the neuroscience of the mirror neuron system. We distinguish between intensity of experience and accuracy of mental images and compare two models of reader response to descriptions: the jigsaw model (the reader constructs a mental image from items of verbal information) and the experiential model (the reader has an emotional, embodied, and holistic response). We predict which aspects of facial description will provoke a vivid response in the experiential sense and discuss examples of literary descriptions of faces in the light of these predictions. We conclude with an illustration of how these insights can be used in literary history and interpretation.

KW - mirror-neuron system

KW - face recognition

KW - ekphrarsis

KW - imagery

KW - construction

KW - empathy

KW - future

KW - memory

KW - common

U2 - 10.1215/03335372-2010-002

DO - 10.1215/03335372-2010-002

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 433

EP - 463

JO - Poetics Today: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication

JF - Poetics Today: International Journal for Theory and Analysis of Literature and Communication

SN - 0333-5372

IS - 3

ER -