Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged

T. Diefenbach, J.A.A. Sillince

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Abstract

    There is a widely shared understanding that (almost all) human societies, social systems and organisations have been structured as group-based social hierarchies (e.g. Courpasson / Clegg 2006, Sidanius / Pratto 1999, Scott 1990, Mousnier 1973, Laumann et al. 1971). One way or another, most social systems are based on relationships of superiors and subordinates, master and servant, manager and employee - at least, so far. Because of their different status both have quite different views on the world in general, and the social system in particular. Nonetheless, although superiors' and subordinates' status and social positions, their interests and ideologies, power and social actions differ to quite some extent, exactly this strange relationship and interaction seems to produce persistent social order.
    LanguageEnglish
    Publication statusUnpublished - 2 Jul 2009
    Event25th EGOS Colloquium - Barcelona
    Duration: 2 Jul 20094 Jul 2009

    Conference

    Conference25th EGOS Colloquium
    CityBarcelona
    Period2/07/094/07/09

    Fingerprint

    social order
    social system
    social position
    servants
    Ideologies
    employee
    manager
    interaction
    society
    time
    Group

    Keywords

    • hierarchical social order
    • relationships of superiors and subordinates

    Cite this

    Diefenbach, T., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2009). Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged. Paper presented at 25th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona, .
    Diefenbach, T. ; Sillince, J.A.A. / Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged. Paper presented at 25th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona, .
    @conference{f89781485aaf4340bcd5e910cd4b5c9d,
    title = "Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged",
    abstract = "There is a widely shared understanding that (almost all) human societies, social systems and organisations have been structured as group-based social hierarchies (e.g. Courpasson / Clegg 2006, Sidanius / Pratto 1999, Scott 1990, Mousnier 1973, Laumann et al. 1971). One way or another, most social systems are based on relationships of superiors and subordinates, master and servant, manager and employee - at least, so far. Because of their different status both have quite different views on the world in general, and the social system in particular. Nonetheless, although superiors' and subordinates' status and social positions, their interests and ideologies, power and social actions differ to quite some extent, exactly this strange relationship and interaction seems to produce persistent social order.",
    keywords = "hierarchical social order, relationships of superiors and subordinates",
    author = "T. Diefenbach and J.A.A. Sillince",
    year = "2009",
    month = "7",
    day = "2",
    language = "English",
    note = "25th EGOS Colloquium ; Conference date: 02-07-2009 Through 04-07-2009",

    }

    Diefenbach, T & Sillince, JAA 2009, 'Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged' Paper presented at 25th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona, 2/07/09 - 4/07/09, .

    Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged. / Diefenbach, T.; Sillince, J.A.A.

    2009. Paper presented at 25th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona, .

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged

    AU - Diefenbach, T.

    AU - Sillince, J.A.A.

    PY - 2009/7/2

    Y1 - 2009/7/2

    N2 - There is a widely shared understanding that (almost all) human societies, social systems and organisations have been structured as group-based social hierarchies (e.g. Courpasson / Clegg 2006, Sidanius / Pratto 1999, Scott 1990, Mousnier 1973, Laumann et al. 1971). One way or another, most social systems are based on relationships of superiors and subordinates, master and servant, manager and employee - at least, so far. Because of their different status both have quite different views on the world in general, and the social system in particular. Nonetheless, although superiors' and subordinates' status and social positions, their interests and ideologies, power and social actions differ to quite some extent, exactly this strange relationship and interaction seems to produce persistent social order.

    AB - There is a widely shared understanding that (almost all) human societies, social systems and organisations have been structured as group-based social hierarchies (e.g. Courpasson / Clegg 2006, Sidanius / Pratto 1999, Scott 1990, Mousnier 1973, Laumann et al. 1971). One way or another, most social systems are based on relationships of superiors and subordinates, master and servant, manager and employee - at least, so far. Because of their different status both have quite different views on the world in general, and the social system in particular. Nonetheless, although superiors' and subordinates' status and social positions, their interests and ideologies, power and social actions differ to quite some extent, exactly this strange relationship and interaction seems to produce persistent social order.

    KW - hierarchical social order

    KW - relationships of superiors and subordinates

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Diefenbach T, Sillince JAA. Crossing boundaries: why hierarchical social order (almost always) persists over time when it is being challenged. 2009. Paper presented at 25th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona, .