Cross-border banking in regulated markets: is financial integration desirable?

Ian Wooton, Andreas Haufler

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Abstract

We set up a two-country, regional model of trade in financial services. Competitive firms in each country manufacture untraded consumer goods in an uncertain productive environment, borrowing funds from a bank in either the home or the foreign market. Duopolistic banks can choose their levels of monitoring of firms and thus the levels of risk-taking, where the risk of bank failure is partly borne by taxpayers in the banks’ home countries. Moreover, each bank chooses the share of its lending allocated between domestic and foreign firms, but the bank’s overall loan volume is fixed by a capital requirement set optimally in its home country. In this setting we consider two types of financial integration. A reduction in the transaction costs of cross-border banking reduces aggregate output and increases risk-taking, thus harming consumers and taxpayers in both countries. In contrast, a reduction in the costs of screening foreign firms is likely to be beneficial for banks, consumers, and taxpayers alike.
LanguageEnglish
Place of PublicationMunich
Pages1-39
Number of pages39
Volume6150
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Publication series

NameCESifo Working Paper
PublisherCenter for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute
No.6150
ISSN (Print)2364-1428

Fingerprint

Banking
Cross-border
Financial integration
Foreign firms
Home country
Risk taking
Loans
Capital requirements
Screening
Lending
Transaction costs
Financial services
Costs
Borrowing
Bank failure
Monitoring
Domestic firms
Aggregate output

Keywords

  • cross-border banking
  • capital regulation
  • financial integration

Cite this

Wooton, I., & Haufler, A. (2016). Cross-border banking in regulated markets: is financial integration desirable? (pp. 1-39). (CESifo Working Paper; No. 6150). Munich.
Wooton, Ian ; Haufler, Andreas. / Cross-border banking in regulated markets : is financial integration desirable?. Munich, 2016. pp. 1-39 (CESifo Working Paper; 6150).
@techreport{a9bb44104c92468a92845d72e6a53306,
title = "Cross-border banking in regulated markets: is financial integration desirable?",
abstract = "We set up a two-country, regional model of trade in financial services. Competitive firms in each country manufacture untraded consumer goods in an uncertain productive environment, borrowing funds from a bank in either the home or the foreign market. Duopolistic banks can choose their levels of monitoring of firms and thus the levels of risk-taking, where the risk of bank failure is partly borne by taxpayers in the banks’ home countries. Moreover, each bank chooses the share of its lending allocated between domestic and foreign firms, but the bank’s overall loan volume is fixed by a capital requirement set optimally in its home country. In this setting we consider two types of financial integration. A reduction in the transaction costs of cross-border banking reduces aggregate output and increases risk-taking, thus harming consumers and taxpayers in both countries. In contrast, a reduction in the costs of screening foreign firms is likely to be beneficial for banks, consumers, and taxpayers alike.",
keywords = "cross-border banking, capital regulation, financial integration",
author = "Ian Wooton and Andreas Haufler",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "6150",
series = "CESifo Working Paper",
publisher = "Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute",
number = "6150",
pages = "1--39",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute",

}

Wooton, I & Haufler, A 2016 'Cross-border banking in regulated markets: is financial integration desirable?' CESifo Working Paper, no. 6150, Munich, pp. 1-39.

Cross-border banking in regulated markets : is financial integration desirable? / Wooton, Ian; Haufler, Andreas.

Munich, 2016. p. 1-39 (CESifo Working Paper; No. 6150).

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Cross-border banking in regulated markets

T2 - is financial integration desirable?

AU - Wooton, Ian

AU - Haufler, Andreas

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - We set up a two-country, regional model of trade in financial services. Competitive firms in each country manufacture untraded consumer goods in an uncertain productive environment, borrowing funds from a bank in either the home or the foreign market. Duopolistic banks can choose their levels of monitoring of firms and thus the levels of risk-taking, where the risk of bank failure is partly borne by taxpayers in the banks’ home countries. Moreover, each bank chooses the share of its lending allocated between domestic and foreign firms, but the bank’s overall loan volume is fixed by a capital requirement set optimally in its home country. In this setting we consider two types of financial integration. A reduction in the transaction costs of cross-border banking reduces aggregate output and increases risk-taking, thus harming consumers and taxpayers in both countries. In contrast, a reduction in the costs of screening foreign firms is likely to be beneficial for banks, consumers, and taxpayers alike.

AB - We set up a two-country, regional model of trade in financial services. Competitive firms in each country manufacture untraded consumer goods in an uncertain productive environment, borrowing funds from a bank in either the home or the foreign market. Duopolistic banks can choose their levels of monitoring of firms and thus the levels of risk-taking, where the risk of bank failure is partly borne by taxpayers in the banks’ home countries. Moreover, each bank chooses the share of its lending allocated between domestic and foreign firms, but the bank’s overall loan volume is fixed by a capital requirement set optimally in its home country. In this setting we consider two types of financial integration. A reduction in the transaction costs of cross-border banking reduces aggregate output and increases risk-taking, thus harming consumers and taxpayers in both countries. In contrast, a reduction in the costs of screening foreign firms is likely to be beneficial for banks, consumers, and taxpayers alike.

KW - cross-border banking

KW - capital regulation

KW - financial integration

M3 - Discussion paper

VL - 6150

T3 - CESifo Working Paper

SP - 1

EP - 39

BT - Cross-border banking in regulated markets

CY - Munich

ER -

Wooton I, Haufler A. Cross-border banking in regulated markets: is financial integration desirable? Munich. 2016 Oct, p. 1-39. (CESifo Working Paper; 6150).