Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests

A. Boin, P. Hart, Allan McConnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

206 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When societies are confronted with major, disruptive emergencies, the fate of politicians and public policies hangs in the balance. Both government actors and their critics will try to escape blame for their occurrence, consolidate/strengthen their political capital, and advance/defend the policies they stand for. Crises thus generate framing contests to interpret events, their causes, and the responsibilities and lessons involved in ways that suit their political purposes and visions of future policy directions. This article dissects these processes and articulates foundations for a theory of crisis exploitation. Drawing on 15 cases of crisis-induced framing contests, we identify potentially crucial factors that may explain both the political (effects on incumbent office-holders/institutions) and policy (effects on programs) impacts of crises.
LanguageEnglish
Pages81-106
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

exploitation
politician
critic
public policy
responsibility
cause
event
society

Keywords

  • crisis exploitation
  • crisis management
  • framing contests
  • policy reform

Cite this

@article{1d92ce06759445ac90e4137c2601c25e,
title = "Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests",
abstract = "When societies are confronted with major, disruptive emergencies, the fate of politicians and public policies hangs in the balance. Both government actors and their critics will try to escape blame for their occurrence, consolidate/strengthen their political capital, and advance/defend the policies they stand for. Crises thus generate framing contests to interpret events, their causes, and the responsibilities and lessons involved in ways that suit their political purposes and visions of future policy directions. This article dissects these processes and articulates foundations for a theory of crisis exploitation. Drawing on 15 cases of crisis-induced framing contests, we identify potentially crucial factors that may explain both the political (effects on incumbent office-holders/institutions) and policy (effects on programs) impacts of crises.",
keywords = "crisis exploitation, crisis management, framing contests, policy reform",
author = "A. Boin and P. Hart and Allan McConnell",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13501760802453221",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "81--106",
journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",
issn = "1350-1763",
number = "1",

}

Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests. / Boin, A.; Hart, P.; McConnell, Allan.

In: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 81-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Crisis exploitation: political and policy impacts of framing contests

AU - Boin, A.

AU - Hart, P.

AU - McConnell, Allan

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - When societies are confronted with major, disruptive emergencies, the fate of politicians and public policies hangs in the balance. Both government actors and their critics will try to escape blame for their occurrence, consolidate/strengthen their political capital, and advance/defend the policies they stand for. Crises thus generate framing contests to interpret events, their causes, and the responsibilities and lessons involved in ways that suit their political purposes and visions of future policy directions. This article dissects these processes and articulates foundations for a theory of crisis exploitation. Drawing on 15 cases of crisis-induced framing contests, we identify potentially crucial factors that may explain both the political (effects on incumbent office-holders/institutions) and policy (effects on programs) impacts of crises.

AB - When societies are confronted with major, disruptive emergencies, the fate of politicians and public policies hangs in the balance. Both government actors and their critics will try to escape blame for their occurrence, consolidate/strengthen their political capital, and advance/defend the policies they stand for. Crises thus generate framing contests to interpret events, their causes, and the responsibilities and lessons involved in ways that suit their political purposes and visions of future policy directions. This article dissects these processes and articulates foundations for a theory of crisis exploitation. Drawing on 15 cases of crisis-induced framing contests, we identify potentially crucial factors that may explain both the political (effects on incumbent office-holders/institutions) and policy (effects on programs) impacts of crises.

KW - crisis exploitation

KW - crisis management

KW - framing contests

KW - policy reform

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453221

U2 - 10.1080/13501760802453221

DO - 10.1080/13501760802453221

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 81

EP - 106

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

T2 - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

SN - 1350-1763

IS - 1

ER -