Counting sea lice on Atlantic salmon farms: empirical and theoretical observations

Peter A. Heuch, George Gettinby, Crawford Revie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This communication briefly reviews some of the factors which have shaped the current protocols for lice counting on salmon farms and points out that the motivation for counting is not always the same. It is also apparent that a number of widely accepted assumptions, such as those relating to presumed lice population distributions or the ability to pre-select highly infested cages, cannot be uncritically accepted. Recent research from Scotland, Norway and Canada has demonstrated that the fish on farm sites are clustered in cages which have significant differences in lice abundance. Moreover, the prevalence and distribution of lice in farmed and wild fish populations have distinct patterns. At low prevalence the distributions can be described by the
negative binomial distribution, whereas at high prevalence lice tend to be normally distributed. The monitoring strategy of sampling the most infested cage on a farm for early detection of a breach of treatment trigger levels for lice is flawed. These findings need to be taken into account when sampling protocols for lice are designed. In particular, precision in estimating prevalence and abundance of lice on the site requires
random sampling from many cages. There is no evidence of systematic bias rising from the use of farm staff counting sea lice compared with dedicated counting teams.
LanguageEnglish
Pages149-153
Number of pages5
JournalAquaculture
Volume320
Issue number3-4
Early online date12 May 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Caligidae
louse
lice
Salmo salar
farm
farms
cages
sampling
farmed fish
sea
wild fish
population distribution
Scotland
fish
salmon
Norway
Canada
communication
monitoring

Keywords

  • sampling
  • Sea lice
  • lice distribution
  • clustering
  • lice counts

Cite this

Heuch, Peter A. ; Gettinby, George ; Revie, Crawford. / Counting sea lice on Atlantic salmon farms : empirical and theoretical observations. In: Aquaculture. 2011 ; Vol. 320, No. 3-4. pp. 149-153.
@article{c73689a07834479e99a60ff53a3c9aa0,
title = "Counting sea lice on Atlantic salmon farms: empirical and theoretical observations",
abstract = "This communication briefly reviews some of the factors which have shaped the current protocols for lice counting on salmon farms and points out that the motivation for counting is not always the same. It is also apparent that a number of widely accepted assumptions, such as those relating to presumed lice population distributions or the ability to pre-select highly infested cages, cannot be uncritically accepted. Recent research from Scotland, Norway and Canada has demonstrated that the fish on farm sites are clustered in cages which have significant differences in lice abundance. Moreover, the prevalence and distribution of lice in farmed and wild fish populations have distinct patterns. At low prevalence the distributions can be described by the negative binomial distribution, whereas at high prevalence lice tend to be normally distributed. The monitoring strategy of sampling the most infested cage on a farm for early detection of a breach of treatment trigger levels for lice is flawed. These findings need to be taken into account when sampling protocols for lice are designed. In particular, precision in estimating prevalence and abundance of lice on the site requires random sampling from many cages. There is no evidence of systematic bias rising from the use of farm staff counting sea lice compared with dedicated counting teams.",
keywords = "sampling , Sea lice, lice distribution, clustering, lice counts",
author = "Heuch, {Peter A.} and George Gettinby and Crawford Revie",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "320",
pages = "149--153",
journal = "Aquaculture",
issn = "0044-8486",
number = "3-4",

}

Counting sea lice on Atlantic salmon farms : empirical and theoretical observations. / Heuch, Peter A.; Gettinby, George; Revie, Crawford.

In: Aquaculture, Vol. 320, No. 3-4, 01.11.2011, p. 149-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Counting sea lice on Atlantic salmon farms

T2 - Aquaculture

AU - Heuch, Peter A.

AU - Gettinby, George

AU - Revie, Crawford

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - This communication briefly reviews some of the factors which have shaped the current protocols for lice counting on salmon farms and points out that the motivation for counting is not always the same. It is also apparent that a number of widely accepted assumptions, such as those relating to presumed lice population distributions or the ability to pre-select highly infested cages, cannot be uncritically accepted. Recent research from Scotland, Norway and Canada has demonstrated that the fish on farm sites are clustered in cages which have significant differences in lice abundance. Moreover, the prevalence and distribution of lice in farmed and wild fish populations have distinct patterns. At low prevalence the distributions can be described by the negative binomial distribution, whereas at high prevalence lice tend to be normally distributed. The monitoring strategy of sampling the most infested cage on a farm for early detection of a breach of treatment trigger levels for lice is flawed. These findings need to be taken into account when sampling protocols for lice are designed. In particular, precision in estimating prevalence and abundance of lice on the site requires random sampling from many cages. There is no evidence of systematic bias rising from the use of farm staff counting sea lice compared with dedicated counting teams.

AB - This communication briefly reviews some of the factors which have shaped the current protocols for lice counting on salmon farms and points out that the motivation for counting is not always the same. It is also apparent that a number of widely accepted assumptions, such as those relating to presumed lice population distributions or the ability to pre-select highly infested cages, cannot be uncritically accepted. Recent research from Scotland, Norway and Canada has demonstrated that the fish on farm sites are clustered in cages which have significant differences in lice abundance. Moreover, the prevalence and distribution of lice in farmed and wild fish populations have distinct patterns. At low prevalence the distributions can be described by the negative binomial distribution, whereas at high prevalence lice tend to be normally distributed. The monitoring strategy of sampling the most infested cage on a farm for early detection of a breach of treatment trigger levels for lice is flawed. These findings need to be taken into account when sampling protocols for lice are designed. In particular, precision in estimating prevalence and abundance of lice on the site requires random sampling from many cages. There is no evidence of systematic bias rising from the use of farm staff counting sea lice compared with dedicated counting teams.

KW - sampling

KW - Sea lice

KW - lice distribution

KW - clustering

KW - lice counts

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054019713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.elsevier.com/ locate/aqua-online

U2 - 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 320

SP - 149

EP - 153

JO - Aquaculture

JF - Aquaculture

SN - 0044-8486

IS - 3-4

ER -