Counting all, counting on, counting up, counting down

the role of counting in learning to add and subtract

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    22 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In the last twenty years research on children’s acquisition of numerical skills and concepts has been a vibrant topic of enquiry amongst psychologists and educators alike. While there has been a diversity of interest between the different disciplines, there is consensus in their recognition that young children have much more mathematical knowledge and understanding than was once thought possible. One very significant finding, largely precipitated by the seminal work of Gelman and Gallistel (1978) is that children as young as three years of age may be able to count with an implicit understanding of what they are doing. Such counting is not to be thought of as the mechanistic, rote process once so derided by Piaget (1952) but rather as principled knowledge which allows children to make precise quantitative judgements as distinct from exclusively perceptual or qualitative judgements. According to Schaeffer et al, and Gelman and Gallistell, the essence of this knowledge is understanding the ‘cardinality rule’ or the ‘cardinal principle’; of knowing that the last count word in a sequence represents the numerosity of the set of countables. And it is this knowledge, which underlies learning to add (Groen and Parkman, 1972; Fuson, 1982; Secada et al, 1983) and to subtract (Wood et al, 1975; Fuson, 1986). If counting is critical to the development of addition and subtraction, then clearly it is desirable to understand what the relationship might be.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)17-21
    Number of pages5
    JournalEducation 3-13
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1995

    Fingerprint

    learning
    psychologist
    educator

    Keywords

    • counting
    • numbers
    • adding
    • subtracting
    • teaching
    • learning

    Cite this

    @article{d27b980086054106a76f42f3d2f8940e,
    title = "Counting all, counting on, counting up, counting down: the role of counting in learning to add and subtract",
    abstract = "In the last twenty years research on children’s acquisition of numerical skills and concepts has been a vibrant topic of enquiry amongst psychologists and educators alike. While there has been a diversity of interest between the different disciplines, there is consensus in their recognition that young children have much more mathematical knowledge and understanding than was once thought possible. One very significant finding, largely precipitated by the seminal work of Gelman and Gallistel (1978) is that children as young as three years of age may be able to count with an implicit understanding of what they are doing. Such counting is not to be thought of as the mechanistic, rote process once so derided by Piaget (1952) but rather as principled knowledge which allows children to make precise quantitative judgements as distinct from exclusively perceptual or qualitative judgements. According to Schaeffer et al, and Gelman and Gallistell, the essence of this knowledge is understanding the ‘cardinality rule’ or the ‘cardinal principle’; of knowing that the last count word in a sequence represents the numerosity of the set of countables. And it is this knowledge, which underlies learning to add (Groen and Parkman, 1972; Fuson, 1982; Secada et al, 1983) and to subtract (Wood et al, 1975; Fuson, 1986). If counting is critical to the development of addition and subtraction, then clearly it is desirable to understand what the relationship might be.",
    keywords = "counting, numbers, adding , subtracting, teaching, learning",
    author = "Effie Maclellan",
    year = "1995",
    doi = "10.1080/03004279585200261",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "17--21",
    journal = "Education 3-13",
    issn = "0300-4279",
    number = "3",

    }

    Counting all, counting on, counting up, counting down : the role of counting in learning to add and subtract. / Maclellan, Effie.

    In: Education 3-13, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1995, p. 17-21.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Counting all, counting on, counting up, counting down

    T2 - the role of counting in learning to add and subtract

    AU - Maclellan, Effie

    PY - 1995

    Y1 - 1995

    N2 - In the last twenty years research on children’s acquisition of numerical skills and concepts has been a vibrant topic of enquiry amongst psychologists and educators alike. While there has been a diversity of interest between the different disciplines, there is consensus in their recognition that young children have much more mathematical knowledge and understanding than was once thought possible. One very significant finding, largely precipitated by the seminal work of Gelman and Gallistel (1978) is that children as young as three years of age may be able to count with an implicit understanding of what they are doing. Such counting is not to be thought of as the mechanistic, rote process once so derided by Piaget (1952) but rather as principled knowledge which allows children to make precise quantitative judgements as distinct from exclusively perceptual or qualitative judgements. According to Schaeffer et al, and Gelman and Gallistell, the essence of this knowledge is understanding the ‘cardinality rule’ or the ‘cardinal principle’; of knowing that the last count word in a sequence represents the numerosity of the set of countables. And it is this knowledge, which underlies learning to add (Groen and Parkman, 1972; Fuson, 1982; Secada et al, 1983) and to subtract (Wood et al, 1975; Fuson, 1986). If counting is critical to the development of addition and subtraction, then clearly it is desirable to understand what the relationship might be.

    AB - In the last twenty years research on children’s acquisition of numerical skills and concepts has been a vibrant topic of enquiry amongst psychologists and educators alike. While there has been a diversity of interest between the different disciplines, there is consensus in their recognition that young children have much more mathematical knowledge and understanding than was once thought possible. One very significant finding, largely precipitated by the seminal work of Gelman and Gallistel (1978) is that children as young as three years of age may be able to count with an implicit understanding of what they are doing. Such counting is not to be thought of as the mechanistic, rote process once so derided by Piaget (1952) but rather as principled knowledge which allows children to make precise quantitative judgements as distinct from exclusively perceptual or qualitative judgements. According to Schaeffer et al, and Gelman and Gallistell, the essence of this knowledge is understanding the ‘cardinality rule’ or the ‘cardinal principle’; of knowing that the last count word in a sequence represents the numerosity of the set of countables. And it is this knowledge, which underlies learning to add (Groen and Parkman, 1972; Fuson, 1982; Secada et al, 1983) and to subtract (Wood et al, 1975; Fuson, 1986). If counting is critical to the development of addition and subtraction, then clearly it is desirable to understand what the relationship might be.

    KW - counting

    KW - numbers

    KW - adding

    KW - subtracting

    KW - teaching

    KW - learning

    U2 - 10.1080/03004279585200261

    DO - 10.1080/03004279585200261

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 17

    EP - 21

    JO - Education 3-13

    JF - Education 3-13

    SN - 0300-4279

    IS - 3

    ER -