Counterinsurgency and Terror expertise: The integration of academics into the war effort

David Miller, Tom Mills

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this paper the authors draw upon the tradition of Power Structure Research to analyse the increased interpenetration of the military and the social sciences, particularly the recruitment of anthropologists and the adoption and adaptation of counterinsurgency strategies. It is argued that such actors should be understood not as disinterested 'experts' but as being organically embedded in a military-industrial-academic complex. The paper considers a number of contemporary examples as well as considering the historical roots of these trends. It is argued that this interpenetration violates the ethical norms of the academy and the moral and social responsibilities of intellectuals.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages203-221
    Number of pages18
    JournalCambridge Review of International Affairs
    Volume23
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

    Fingerprint

    interpenetration
    terrorism
    expertise
    Military
    distribution of power
    social responsibility
    intellectual
    academy
    social science
    expert
    trend

    Keywords

    • power structure
    • counterinsurgency strategies
    • ethics
    • moral responsibility

    Cite this

    @article{355955482b5346e08c64ab77aadf5d31,
    title = "Counterinsurgency and Terror expertise: The integration of academics into the war effort",
    abstract = "In this paper the authors draw upon the tradition of Power Structure Research to analyse the increased interpenetration of the military and the social sciences, particularly the recruitment of anthropologists and the adoption and adaptation of counterinsurgency strategies. It is argued that such actors should be understood not as disinterested 'experts' but as being organically embedded in a military-industrial-academic complex. The paper considers a number of contemporary examples as well as considering the historical roots of these trends. It is argued that this interpenetration violates the ethical norms of the academy and the moral and social responsibilities of intellectuals.",
    keywords = "power structure, counterinsurgency strategies, ethics, moral responsibility",
    author = "David Miller and Tom Mills",
    year = "2010",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1080/09557571.2010.481664",
    language = "English",
    volume = "23",
    pages = "203--221",
    journal = "Cambridge Review of International Affairs",
    issn = "0955-7571",
    number = "2",

    }

    Counterinsurgency and Terror expertise: The integration of academics into the war effort. / Miller, David; Mills, Tom.

    In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 23, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 203-221.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Counterinsurgency and Terror expertise: The integration of academics into the war effort

    AU - Miller, David

    AU - Mills, Tom

    PY - 2010/6

    Y1 - 2010/6

    N2 - In this paper the authors draw upon the tradition of Power Structure Research to analyse the increased interpenetration of the military and the social sciences, particularly the recruitment of anthropologists and the adoption and adaptation of counterinsurgency strategies. It is argued that such actors should be understood not as disinterested 'experts' but as being organically embedded in a military-industrial-academic complex. The paper considers a number of contemporary examples as well as considering the historical roots of these trends. It is argued that this interpenetration violates the ethical norms of the academy and the moral and social responsibilities of intellectuals.

    AB - In this paper the authors draw upon the tradition of Power Structure Research to analyse the increased interpenetration of the military and the social sciences, particularly the recruitment of anthropologists and the adoption and adaptation of counterinsurgency strategies. It is argued that such actors should be understood not as disinterested 'experts' but as being organically embedded in a military-industrial-academic complex. The paper considers a number of contemporary examples as well as considering the historical roots of these trends. It is argued that this interpenetration violates the ethical norms of the academy and the moral and social responsibilities of intellectuals.

    KW - power structure

    KW - counterinsurgency strategies

    KW - ethics

    KW - moral responsibility

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956249273&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2010.481664

    U2 - 10.1080/09557571.2010.481664

    DO - 10.1080/09557571.2010.481664

    M3 - Article

    VL - 23

    SP - 203

    EP - 221

    JO - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

    T2 - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

    JF - Cambridge Review of International Affairs

    SN - 0955-7571

    IS - 2

    ER -