Cost and losses associated with offshore wind farm collection networks which centralise the turbine power electronic converters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Costs and losses have been calculated for several different network topologies, which centralise the turbine power electronic converters, in order to improve access for maintenance. These are divided into star topologies, where each turbine is connected individually to its own converter on a platform housing many converters, and cluster topologies, where multiple turbines are connected through a single large converter. Both AC and DC topologies were considered, along with standard string topologies for comparison. Star and cluster topologies were both found to have higher costs and losses than the string topology. In the case of the star topology, this is due to the longer cable length and higher component count. In the case of the cluster topology, this is due to the reduced energy capture from controlling turbine speeds in clusters rather than individually. DC topologies were generally found to have a lower cost and loss than AC, but the fact that the converters are not commercially available makes this advantage less certain.
LanguageEnglish
Pages390-400
Number of pages21
JournalIET Renewable Power Generation
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Offshore wind farms
Power electronics
Turbines
Topology
Costs
Stars
Cables

Keywords

  • cost and losses
  • offshore wind farm
  • collection networks

Cite this

@article{8068207e1b024ee2aff0c96739222ba9,
title = "Cost and losses associated with offshore wind farm collection networks which centralise the turbine power electronic converters",
abstract = "Costs and losses have been calculated for several different network topologies, which centralise the turbine power electronic converters, in order to improve access for maintenance. These are divided into star topologies, where each turbine is connected individually to its own converter on a platform housing many converters, and cluster topologies, where multiple turbines are connected through a single large converter. Both AC and DC topologies were considered, along with standard string topologies for comparison. Star and cluster topologies were both found to have higher costs and losses than the string topology. In the case of the star topology, this is due to the longer cable length and higher component count. In the case of the cluster topology, this is due to the reduced energy capture from controlling turbine speeds in clusters rather than individually. DC topologies were generally found to have a lower cost and loss than AC, but the fact that the converters are not commercially available makes this advantage less certain.",
keywords = "cost and losses, offshore wind farm, collection networks",
author = "Max Parker and Olimpo Anaya-Lara",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1049/iet-rpg.2012.0262",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "390--400",
journal = "IET Renewable Power Generation",
issn = "1752-1416",
publisher = "Institution of Engineering and Technology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost and losses associated with offshore wind farm collection networks which centralise the turbine power electronic converters

AU - Parker, Max

AU - Anaya-Lara, Olimpo

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Costs and losses have been calculated for several different network topologies, which centralise the turbine power electronic converters, in order to improve access for maintenance. These are divided into star topologies, where each turbine is connected individually to its own converter on a platform housing many converters, and cluster topologies, where multiple turbines are connected through a single large converter. Both AC and DC topologies were considered, along with standard string topologies for comparison. Star and cluster topologies were both found to have higher costs and losses than the string topology. In the case of the star topology, this is due to the longer cable length and higher component count. In the case of the cluster topology, this is due to the reduced energy capture from controlling turbine speeds in clusters rather than individually. DC topologies were generally found to have a lower cost and loss than AC, but the fact that the converters are not commercially available makes this advantage less certain.

AB - Costs and losses have been calculated for several different network topologies, which centralise the turbine power electronic converters, in order to improve access for maintenance. These are divided into star topologies, where each turbine is connected individually to its own converter on a platform housing many converters, and cluster topologies, where multiple turbines are connected through a single large converter. Both AC and DC topologies were considered, along with standard string topologies for comparison. Star and cluster topologies were both found to have higher costs and losses than the string topology. In the case of the star topology, this is due to the longer cable length and higher component count. In the case of the cluster topology, this is due to the reduced energy capture from controlling turbine speeds in clusters rather than individually. DC topologies were generally found to have a lower cost and loss than AC, but the fact that the converters are not commercially available makes this advantage less certain.

KW - cost and losses

KW - offshore wind farm

KW - collection networks

UR - http://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/iet-rpg.2012.0262

U2 - 10.1049/iet-rpg.2012.0262

DO - 10.1049/iet-rpg.2012.0262

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 390

EP - 400

JO - IET Renewable Power Generation

T2 - IET Renewable Power Generation

JF - IET Renewable Power Generation

SN - 1752-1416

IS - 4

ER -