Cosmopolitanism or globalisation: the anthropocene turn

Jose Alcaraz, Kath Sugars, Katerina Nicolopoulou, Francisco Tirado

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to advance the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” by (a)
approaching this rich literature from cultural, ethical and governance angles, and (b) by introducing key notions
from the work that has taken place in the natural sciences, around the Anthropocene.
Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on analytical tactics that draw on a literature review and
thematic analysis.
Findings – The composite analytical “lens” introduced here (crafted around cultural, ethical and governance
angles) to approach the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” plus the engagement with the literature on the
Anthropocene, allow us to engage with current understandings of the global and the “planetary” that are the heart of
cosmopolitanism.
Research limitations/implications – The paper deals with and merges two complex streams of literature
(“cosmopolitanism or globalization” and the Anthropocene), and as such needs to be seen as part of an initial,
exploratory scholarly effort.
Practical implications – The analytical “lens” described here shall be of further use to develop current trends reclaiming
cosmopolitanism for the study of organizations.
Social implications – Our work can help to nurture a cosmopolitan sensitivity which celebrates difference,
highlights expanded concerns for the ‘distant other’, and fosters involvement in new forms of governance.
Originality/value – The approaches introduced here bring new angles to continue thinking about the planet as the
‘cosmos’ of cosmopolitanism, and to explore new understandings around organizations and (global) responsibility.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages16
JournalSociety and Business Review
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Globalization
Cosmopolitanism
Governance
Literature review
Design methodology
Tactics
Responsibility

Keywords

  • globalization
  • cosmopolitanism
  • cultural difference
  • ethics
  • global governance
  • responsibility

Cite this

@article{7e37cba0e49a4a3e92d869c193a96c59,
title = "Cosmopolitanism or globalisation: the anthropocene turn",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to advance the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” by (a)approaching this rich literature from cultural, ethical and governance angles, and (b) by introducing key notionsfrom the work that has taken place in the natural sciences, around the Anthropocene.Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on analytical tactics that draw on a literature review andthematic analysis.Findings – The composite analytical “lens” introduced here (crafted around cultural, ethical and governanceangles) to approach the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” plus the engagement with the literature on theAnthropocene, allow us to engage with current understandings of the global and the “planetary” that are the heart ofcosmopolitanism.Research limitations/implications – The paper deals with and merges two complex streams of literature(“cosmopolitanism or globalization” and the Anthropocene), and as such needs to be seen as part of an initial,exploratory scholarly effort.Practical implications – The analytical “lens” described here shall be of further use to develop current trends reclaimingcosmopolitanism for the study of organizations.Social implications – Our work can help to nurture a cosmopolitan sensitivity which celebrates difference,highlights expanded concerns for the ‘distant other’, and fosters involvement in new forms of governance.Originality/value – The approaches introduced here bring new angles to continue thinking about the planet as the‘cosmos’ of cosmopolitanism, and to explore new understandings around organizations and (global) responsibility.",
keywords = "globalization, cosmopolitanism, cultural difference, ethics, global governance, responsibility",
author = "Jose Alcaraz and Kath Sugars and Katerina Nicolopoulou and Francisco Tirado",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
journal = "Society and Business Review",
issn = "1746-5680",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

}

Cosmopolitanism or globalisation : the anthropocene turn. / Alcaraz, Jose; Sugars, Kath; Nicolopoulou, Katerina; Tirado, Francisco.

In: Society and Business Review , 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cosmopolitanism or globalisation

T2 - Society and Business Review

AU - Alcaraz, Jose

AU - Sugars, Kath

AU - Nicolopoulou, Katerina

AU - Tirado, Francisco

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to advance the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” by (a)approaching this rich literature from cultural, ethical and governance angles, and (b) by introducing key notionsfrom the work that has taken place in the natural sciences, around the Anthropocene.Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on analytical tactics that draw on a literature review andthematic analysis.Findings – The composite analytical “lens” introduced here (crafted around cultural, ethical and governanceangles) to approach the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” plus the engagement with the literature on theAnthropocene, allow us to engage with current understandings of the global and the “planetary” that are the heart ofcosmopolitanism.Research limitations/implications – The paper deals with and merges two complex streams of literature(“cosmopolitanism or globalization” and the Anthropocene), and as such needs to be seen as part of an initial,exploratory scholarly effort.Practical implications – The analytical “lens” described here shall be of further use to develop current trends reclaimingcosmopolitanism for the study of organizations.Social implications – Our work can help to nurture a cosmopolitan sensitivity which celebrates difference,highlights expanded concerns for the ‘distant other’, and fosters involvement in new forms of governance.Originality/value – The approaches introduced here bring new angles to continue thinking about the planet as the‘cosmos’ of cosmopolitanism, and to explore new understandings around organizations and (global) responsibility.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to advance the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” by (a)approaching this rich literature from cultural, ethical and governance angles, and (b) by introducing key notionsfrom the work that has taken place in the natural sciences, around the Anthropocene.Design/methodology/approach – This paper is based on analytical tactics that draw on a literature review andthematic analysis.Findings – The composite analytical “lens” introduced here (crafted around cultural, ethical and governanceangles) to approach the debate on “cosmopolitanism or globalization” plus the engagement with the literature on theAnthropocene, allow us to engage with current understandings of the global and the “planetary” that are the heart ofcosmopolitanism.Research limitations/implications – The paper deals with and merges two complex streams of literature(“cosmopolitanism or globalization” and the Anthropocene), and as such needs to be seen as part of an initial,exploratory scholarly effort.Practical implications – The analytical “lens” described here shall be of further use to develop current trends reclaimingcosmopolitanism for the study of organizations.Social implications – Our work can help to nurture a cosmopolitan sensitivity which celebrates difference,highlights expanded concerns for the ‘distant other’, and fosters involvement in new forms of governance.Originality/value – The approaches introduced here bring new angles to continue thinking about the planet as the‘cosmos’ of cosmopolitanism, and to explore new understandings around organizations and (global) responsibility.

KW - globalization

KW - cosmopolitanism

KW - cultural difference

KW - ethics

KW - global governance

KW - responsibility

M3 - Article

JO - Society and Business Review

JF - Society and Business Review

SN - 1746-5680

ER -