Corporate political activism, information transparency, and IPO compliance costs

Dimitrios Gounopoulos, Georgios Loukopoulos, Panagiotis Loukopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Due to their covert and often dubious nature, corporate political activities may encourage or facilitate opportunistic behaviors. Yet, they also subject firms to heightened visibility, which brings greater public and regulatory scrutiny. Using a hand-collected data set of politically connected US initial public offerings (IPOs), we investigate how this tension shapes the financial reporting incentives of firms going public and the accompanying direct compliance costs. Consistent with the agency view of corporate political activism (CPA), politically active IPO issuers have worse financial reporting quality, more litigation risk and eventually pay 28% more accounting fees than their peers. Additional analysis exploiting the US Supreme Court's landmark ruling on Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission suggests that the link between CPA and IPO accounting fees is likely to be causal. Finally, our evidence indicates that the involvement of specialized financial intermediaries in the political process has implications for the IPO financial reporting quality.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of Business Finance & Accounting
Early online date1 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • initial public offerings
  • issuance costs
  • political money contributions
  • corporate political activities
  • IPO accounting fees

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate political activism, information transparency, and IPO compliance costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this