Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain

Graeme G. Acheson, Gareth Campbell, John D Turner, Nadia Vanteeva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using ownership and control data for 890 firm‐years, this article examines the concentration of capital and voting rights in British companies in the second half of the nineteenth century. We find that both capital and voting rights were diffuse by modern‐day standards. However, this does not necessarily mean that there was a modern‐style separation of ownership from control in Victorian Britain. One major implication of our findings is that diffuse ownership was present in the UK much earlier than previously thought, and given that it occurred in an era with weak shareholder protection law, it somewhat undermines the influential law and finance hypothesis. We also find that diffuse ownership is correlated with large boards, a London head office, non‐linear voting rights, and shares traded on multiple markets.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)911-936
Number of pages26
JournalEconomic History Review
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

Ownership and control
Corporate ownership
Voting rights
Corporate control
Ownership
Victorian Britain
Voting
Shareholder protection
Law and finance
Finance

Keywords

  • corporate ownership
  • Victorian Britain
  • modern public company

Cite this

Acheson, Graeme G. ; Campbell, Gareth ; Turner, John D ; Vanteeva, Nadia. / Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain. In: Economic History Review. 2014 ; Vol. 68, No. 3. pp. 911-936.
@article{be2168d9d6b84a8a819b7c37eed37b65,
title = "Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain",
abstract = "Using ownership and control data for 890 firm‐years, this article examines the concentration of capital and voting rights in British companies in the second half of the nineteenth century. We find that both capital and voting rights were diffuse by modern‐day standards. However, this does not necessarily mean that there was a modern‐style separation of ownership from control in Victorian Britain. One major implication of our findings is that diffuse ownership was present in the UK much earlier than previously thought, and given that it occurred in an era with weak shareholder protection law, it somewhat undermines the influential law and finance hypothesis. We also find that diffuse ownership is correlated with large boards, a London head office, non‐linear voting rights, and shares traded on multiple markets.",
keywords = "corporate ownership, Victorian Britain, modern public company",
author = "Acheson, {Graeme G.} and Gareth Campbell and Turner, {John D} and Nadia Vanteeva",
note = "This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12086 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1111/ehr.12086",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "911--936",
journal = "Economic History Review",
issn = "0013-0117",
number = "3",

}

Acheson, GG, Campbell, G, Turner, JD & Vanteeva, N 2014, 'Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain', Economic History Review, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 911-936. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12086

Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain. / Acheson, Graeme G.; Campbell, Gareth; Turner, John D; Vanteeva, Nadia.

In: Economic History Review, Vol. 68, No. 3, 10.11.2014, p. 911-936.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain

AU - Acheson, Graeme G.

AU - Campbell, Gareth

AU - Turner, John D

AU - Vanteeva, Nadia

N1 - This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: Corporate ownership and control in victorian Britain, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12086 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

PY - 2014/11/10

Y1 - 2014/11/10

N2 - Using ownership and control data for 890 firm‐years, this article examines the concentration of capital and voting rights in British companies in the second half of the nineteenth century. We find that both capital and voting rights were diffuse by modern‐day standards. However, this does not necessarily mean that there was a modern‐style separation of ownership from control in Victorian Britain. One major implication of our findings is that diffuse ownership was present in the UK much earlier than previously thought, and given that it occurred in an era with weak shareholder protection law, it somewhat undermines the influential law and finance hypothesis. We also find that diffuse ownership is correlated with large boards, a London head office, non‐linear voting rights, and shares traded on multiple markets.

AB - Using ownership and control data for 890 firm‐years, this article examines the concentration of capital and voting rights in British companies in the second half of the nineteenth century. We find that both capital and voting rights were diffuse by modern‐day standards. However, this does not necessarily mean that there was a modern‐style separation of ownership from control in Victorian Britain. One major implication of our findings is that diffuse ownership was present in the UK much earlier than previously thought, and given that it occurred in an era with weak shareholder protection law, it somewhat undermines the influential law and finance hypothesis. We also find that diffuse ownership is correlated with large boards, a London head office, non‐linear voting rights, and shares traded on multiple markets.

KW - corporate ownership

KW - Victorian Britain

KW - modern public company

U2 - 10.1111/ehr.12086

DO - 10.1111/ehr.12086

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 911

EP - 936

JO - Economic History Review

JF - Economic History Review

SN - 0013-0117

IS - 3

ER -