Core path plan amendment revisited

Malcolm M. Combe

Core path plan amendment revisited

Malcolm M. Combe

Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

51 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Examines Gartmore House v Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (IH) on core path plans and the right to roam under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 Pt 1, and on the need to take into account protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 s.149.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	17-20
Number of pages	4
Journal	Scottish Planning and Environmental Law
Volume	215
Publication status	Published - 15 Feb 2023

Keywords

core path plan amendment
Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003
Gartmore House
Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority
outdoor access
access rights
core paths
Scotland
roaming
right to roam
judicial review
access
local authorities' powers and duties
national park authorities
plans
protected characteristics
public paths
public sector equality duty

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

Combe-SPEL-2023-Core-path-plan-amendment-under-the-Land-Reform-Scotland-Act-2003-revisitedAccepted author manuscript, 168 KBLicence: Strath_1

Cite this

@article{8e09fc5255834b6c9393fe7024c984d6,

title = "Core path plan amendment revisited",

abstract = "Examines Gartmore House v Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (IH) on core path plans and the right to roam under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 Pt 1, and on the need to take into account protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 s.149.",

keywords = "core path plan amendment, Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003, Gartmore House, Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority, outdoor access, access rights, core paths, Scotland, roaming, right to roam, judicial review, access, local authorities' powers and duties, national park authorities, plans, protected characteristics, public paths, public sector equality duty",

author = "Combe, {Malcolm M.}",

year = "2023",

month = feb,

day = "15",

language = "English",

volume = "215",

pages = "17--20",

journal = "Scottish Planning and Environmental Law",

issn = "1350-2808",

publisher = "Planning Exchange",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Core path plan amendment revisited

AU - Combe, Malcolm M.

PY - 2023/2/15

Y1 - 2023/2/15

N2 - Examines Gartmore House v Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (IH) on core path plans and the right to roam under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 Pt 1, and on the need to take into account protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 s.149.

AB - Examines Gartmore House v Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (IH) on core path plans and the right to roam under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 Pt 1, and on the need to take into account protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 s.149.

KW - core path plan amendment

KW - Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003

KW - Gartmore House

KW - Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority

KW - outdoor access

KW - access rights

KW - core paths

KW - Scotland

KW - roaming

KW - right to roam

KW - judicial review

KW - access

KW - local authorities' powers and duties

KW - national park authorities

KW - plans

KW - protected characteristics

KW - public paths

KW - public sector equality duty

UR - https://www.theknowledgeexchange.co.uk/products/scottish-planning-environmental-law/

M3 - Article

SN - 1350-2808

VL - 215

SP - 17

EP - 20

JO - Scottish Planning and Environmental Law

JF - Scottish Planning and Environmental Law

ER -

Core path plan amendment revisited

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Core Path Plan Amendment under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 – Gartmore House v LLTNPA (case comment)

Cite this