Core path plan amendment revisited

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Downloads (Pure)


Examines Gartmore House v Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park Authority (IH) on core path plans and the right to roam under the Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003 Pt 1, and on the need to take into account protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 s.149.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-20
Number of pages4
JournalScottish Planning and Environmental Law
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2023


  • core path plan amendment
  • Land Reform (Scotland) Act 2003
  • Gartmore House
  • Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority
  • outdoor access
  • access rights
  • core paths
  • Scotland
  • roaming
  • right to roam
  • judicial review
  • access
  • local authorities' powers and duties
  • national park authorities
  • plans
  • protected characteristics
  • public paths
  • public sector equality duty


Dive into the research topics of 'Core path plan amendment revisited'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this