Co‐production as a route to employability: lessons from services with lone parents

Colin Lindsay, Sarah Pearson, Elaine Batty, Anne Marie Cullen, Will Eadson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Policy‐makers claim to support personalized approaches to improving the employability of disadvantaged groups. Yet, in liberal welfare states, mainstream activation programmes targeting these groups often deliver standardized, low‐quality services. Such failures may be related to a governance and management regime that uses tightly defined contracting and performance targets to incentivize (mainly for‐profit) service providers to move people into any job as quickly as possible. This article draws on evidence from third sector/public sector‐led services in Scotland to discuss an alternative approach. These services co‐produced personalized support in partnership with disadvantaged service users (in this case vulnerable lone parents). We suggest that, in this case, street‐level co‐production and personalization were facilitated by co‐governance and co‐management in the design and organization of provision. We conclude by identifying lessons for future employability services.
LanguageEnglish
Pages318-332
Number of pages15
JournalPublic Administration
Volume96
Issue number2
Early online date27 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

coproduction
employability
parents
governance
co-management
personalization
welfare state
activation
service provider
public sector
profit
Group
organization
management
performance
evidence

Keywords

  • employability
  • active labour market policy
  • co-production
  • childcare
  • public policy
  • unemployment

Cite this

Lindsay, Colin ; Pearson, Sarah ; Batty, Elaine ; Cullen, Anne Marie ; Eadson, Will. / Co‐production as a route to employability : lessons from services with lone parents. In: Public Administration. 2018 ; Vol. 96, No. 2. pp. 318-332.
@article{9e4a509fee124077b6b5e429845a9239,
title = "Co‐production as a route to employability: lessons from services with lone parents",
abstract = "Policy‐makers claim to support personalized approaches to improving the employability of disadvantaged groups. Yet, in liberal welfare states, mainstream activation programmes targeting these groups often deliver standardized, low‐quality services. Such failures may be related to a governance and management regime that uses tightly defined contracting and performance targets to incentivize (mainly for‐profit) service providers to move people into any job as quickly as possible. This article draws on evidence from third sector/public sector‐led services in Scotland to discuss an alternative approach. These services co‐produced personalized support in partnership with disadvantaged service users (in this case vulnerable lone parents). We suggest that, in this case, street‐level co‐production and personalization were facilitated by co‐governance and co‐management in the design and organization of provision. We conclude by identifying lessons for future employability services.",
keywords = "employability , active labour market policy , co-production, childcare, public policy, unemployment",
author = "Colin Lindsay and Sarah Pearson and Elaine Batty and Cullen, {Anne Marie} and Will Eadson",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/padm.12408",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "318--332",
journal = "Public Administration",
issn = "0033-3298",
number = "2",

}

Co‐production as a route to employability : lessons from services with lone parents. / Lindsay, Colin; Pearson, Sarah; Batty, Elaine; Cullen, Anne Marie; Eadson, Will.

In: Public Administration, Vol. 96, No. 2, 30.06.2018, p. 318-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Co‐production as a route to employability

T2 - Public Administration

AU - Lindsay, Colin

AU - Pearson, Sarah

AU - Batty, Elaine

AU - Cullen, Anne Marie

AU - Eadson, Will

PY - 2018/6/30

Y1 - 2018/6/30

N2 - Policy‐makers claim to support personalized approaches to improving the employability of disadvantaged groups. Yet, in liberal welfare states, mainstream activation programmes targeting these groups often deliver standardized, low‐quality services. Such failures may be related to a governance and management regime that uses tightly defined contracting and performance targets to incentivize (mainly for‐profit) service providers to move people into any job as quickly as possible. This article draws on evidence from third sector/public sector‐led services in Scotland to discuss an alternative approach. These services co‐produced personalized support in partnership with disadvantaged service users (in this case vulnerable lone parents). We suggest that, in this case, street‐level co‐production and personalization were facilitated by co‐governance and co‐management in the design and organization of provision. We conclude by identifying lessons for future employability services.

AB - Policy‐makers claim to support personalized approaches to improving the employability of disadvantaged groups. Yet, in liberal welfare states, mainstream activation programmes targeting these groups often deliver standardized, low‐quality services. Such failures may be related to a governance and management regime that uses tightly defined contracting and performance targets to incentivize (mainly for‐profit) service providers to move people into any job as quickly as possible. This article draws on evidence from third sector/public sector‐led services in Scotland to discuss an alternative approach. These services co‐produced personalized support in partnership with disadvantaged service users (in this case vulnerable lone parents). We suggest that, in this case, street‐level co‐production and personalization were facilitated by co‐governance and co‐management in the design and organization of provision. We conclude by identifying lessons for future employability services.

KW - employability

KW - active labour market policy

KW - co-production

KW - childcare

KW - public policy

KW - unemployment

U2 - 10.1111/padm.12408

DO - 10.1111/padm.12408

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 318

EP - 332

JO - Public Administration

JF - Public Administration

SN - 0033-3298

IS - 2

ER -