Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of computers to support group work - as a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) - on strategy making has grown over the last decade. Some GDSS's have a facilitator managing the computer with the group viewing a public screen displaying the debate, problem definition, and agreements of the group as it negotiates strategies. Others involve members of the group in the direct input of data that forms part of the problem definition - data that is then used by the group employing electronic voting and other organizing devices. This paper discusses a real case relating to an organization seeking to reach important agreements about its strategy. The case involved the top management team and over 50 senior managers. The organization used a facilitator driven GDSS for some of this work, and a networked system for other parts. Some of the meetings were video taped, some were observed through one-way mirrors, and all of the participants were interviewed about their reactions to the different systems. This paper reports on some of the significant contrasts between the two approaches.
LanguageEnglish
Pages47-66
Number of pages19
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

group decision
Decision support systems
Managers
Group
organization
group work
voting
video
electronics
manager
Strategy-making
Group decision support systems
management
Facilitators

Keywords

  • strategy
  • facilitation
  • single user group support
  • networked group support
  • decision support systems
  • management theory

Cite this

@article{2f499ddad6a647b3ae829001f904ed34,
title = "Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making",
abstract = "The use of computers to support group work - as a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) - on strategy making has grown over the last decade. Some GDSS's have a facilitator managing the computer with the group viewing a public screen displaying the debate, problem definition, and agreements of the group as it negotiates strategies. Others involve members of the group in the direct input of data that forms part of the problem definition - data that is then used by the group employing electronic voting and other organizing devices. This paper discusses a real case relating to an organization seeking to reach important agreements about its strategy. The case involved the top management team and over 50 senior managers. The organization used a facilitator driven GDSS for some of this work, and a networked system for other parts. Some of the meetings were video taped, some were observed through one-way mirrors, and all of the participants were interviewed about their reactions to the different systems. This paper reports on some of the significant contrasts between the two approaches.",
keywords = "strategy, facilitation, single user group support, networked group support, decision support systems, management theory",
author = "F. Ackermann and C. Eden",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1023/A:1008708912048",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "47--66",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting single user and networked group decision support systems for strategy making

AU - Ackermann, F.

AU - Eden, C.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The use of computers to support group work - as a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) - on strategy making has grown over the last decade. Some GDSS's have a facilitator managing the computer with the group viewing a public screen displaying the debate, problem definition, and agreements of the group as it negotiates strategies. Others involve members of the group in the direct input of data that forms part of the problem definition - data that is then used by the group employing electronic voting and other organizing devices. This paper discusses a real case relating to an organization seeking to reach important agreements about its strategy. The case involved the top management team and over 50 senior managers. The organization used a facilitator driven GDSS for some of this work, and a networked system for other parts. Some of the meetings were video taped, some were observed through one-way mirrors, and all of the participants were interviewed about their reactions to the different systems. This paper reports on some of the significant contrasts between the two approaches.

AB - The use of computers to support group work - as a Group Decision Support System (GDSS) - on strategy making has grown over the last decade. Some GDSS's have a facilitator managing the computer with the group viewing a public screen displaying the debate, problem definition, and agreements of the group as it negotiates strategies. Others involve members of the group in the direct input of data that forms part of the problem definition - data that is then used by the group employing electronic voting and other organizing devices. This paper discusses a real case relating to an organization seeking to reach important agreements about its strategy. The case involved the top management team and over 50 senior managers. The organization used a facilitator driven GDSS for some of this work, and a networked system for other parts. Some of the meetings were video taped, some were observed through one-way mirrors, and all of the participants were interviewed about their reactions to the different systems. This paper reports on some of the significant contrasts between the two approaches.

KW - strategy

KW - facilitation

KW - single user group support

KW - networked group support

KW - decision support systems

KW - management theory

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008708912048

U2 - 10.1023/A:1008708912048

DO - 10.1023/A:1008708912048

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 47

EP - 66

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

T2 - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

IS - 1

ER -