Contingent work and its contradictions: towards a moral economy framework

Sharon Bolton, Maeve Houlihan, Knut Laaser

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper proposes the lens of moral economy as a useful ethical framework through which to assess HRM practice with a particular focus on the strategic use of contingent work (‘non-standard’ employment practices, including temporary, agency or subcontracted/outsourced work, and ‘independent contracting’). While contingent work practices have a variety of impetuses we focus here on its use as an instrumental tool in the pursuit of competitiveness and flexibility. A review of the contingent work literature conveys mixed messages about its outcomes and consequences for individuals, and more opaquely, for organisations: on the one hand transferring risks yet, on the other, creating opportunities. A moral economy lens views employment as a relationship rooted in a web of social dependencies, and considers that ‘thick’ relations produce valuable ethical surpluses that represent mutuality and human flourishing. Applying such an approach to the analysis of contingent work enables a fresh interpretation of contradictory individual and collective outcomes observed in the research literature. We suggest that evaluations informed by moral economy offer a more holistic appraisal of HRM practices such as contingent work, where both economic and social opportunities and costs can be more fully seen. In this way we not only highlight the ethical inadequacies of neglecting the human in HRM, but also the conceptual pitfalls of analytically separating the economic from the social.
    LanguageEnglish
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Business Ethics
    Early online date25 Sep 2012
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    economy
    social opportunity
    social costs
    competitiveness
    economics
    Contingent work
    Moral economy
    Moral Economy
    Contingent
    flexibility
    interpretation
    evaluation
    Economics
    HRM practices
    literature

    Keywords

    • HRM
    • contingent work
    • human flourishing
    • ethics
    • moral economy
    • employment
    • contradictions

    Cite this

    @article{ced18210e3314b44b275d61abb8a2e16,
    title = "Contingent work and its contradictions: towards a moral economy framework",
    abstract = "This paper proposes the lens of moral economy as a useful ethical framework through which to assess HRM practice with a particular focus on the strategic use of contingent work (‘non-standard’ employment practices, including temporary, agency or subcontracted/outsourced work, and ‘independent contracting’). While contingent work practices have a variety of impetuses we focus here on its use as an instrumental tool in the pursuit of competitiveness and flexibility. A review of the contingent work literature conveys mixed messages about its outcomes and consequences for individuals, and more opaquely, for organisations: on the one hand transferring risks yet, on the other, creating opportunities. A moral economy lens views employment as a relationship rooted in a web of social dependencies, and considers that ‘thick’ relations produce valuable ethical surpluses that represent mutuality and human flourishing. Applying such an approach to the analysis of contingent work enables a fresh interpretation of contradictory individual and collective outcomes observed in the research literature. We suggest that evaluations informed by moral economy offer a more holistic appraisal of HRM practices such as contingent work, where both economic and social opportunities and costs can be more fully seen. In this way we not only highlight the ethical inadequacies of neglecting the human in HRM, but also the conceptual pitfalls of analytically separating the economic from the social.",
    keywords = "HRM, contingent work, human flourishing, ethics, moral economy, employment, contradictions",
    author = "Sharon Bolton and Maeve Houlihan and Knut Laaser",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1007/s10551-012-1439-7",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
    issn = "0167-4544",

    }

    Contingent work and its contradictions : towards a moral economy framework. / Bolton, Sharon; Houlihan, Maeve; Laaser, Knut.

    In: Journal of Business Ethics, 2012.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Contingent work and its contradictions

    T2 - Journal of Business Ethics

    AU - Bolton, Sharon

    AU - Houlihan, Maeve

    AU - Laaser, Knut

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - This paper proposes the lens of moral economy as a useful ethical framework through which to assess HRM practice with a particular focus on the strategic use of contingent work (‘non-standard’ employment practices, including temporary, agency or subcontracted/outsourced work, and ‘independent contracting’). While contingent work practices have a variety of impetuses we focus here on its use as an instrumental tool in the pursuit of competitiveness and flexibility. A review of the contingent work literature conveys mixed messages about its outcomes and consequences for individuals, and more opaquely, for organisations: on the one hand transferring risks yet, on the other, creating opportunities. A moral economy lens views employment as a relationship rooted in a web of social dependencies, and considers that ‘thick’ relations produce valuable ethical surpluses that represent mutuality and human flourishing. Applying such an approach to the analysis of contingent work enables a fresh interpretation of contradictory individual and collective outcomes observed in the research literature. We suggest that evaluations informed by moral economy offer a more holistic appraisal of HRM practices such as contingent work, where both economic and social opportunities and costs can be more fully seen. In this way we not only highlight the ethical inadequacies of neglecting the human in HRM, but also the conceptual pitfalls of analytically separating the economic from the social.

    AB - This paper proposes the lens of moral economy as a useful ethical framework through which to assess HRM practice with a particular focus on the strategic use of contingent work (‘non-standard’ employment practices, including temporary, agency or subcontracted/outsourced work, and ‘independent contracting’). While contingent work practices have a variety of impetuses we focus here on its use as an instrumental tool in the pursuit of competitiveness and flexibility. A review of the contingent work literature conveys mixed messages about its outcomes and consequences for individuals, and more opaquely, for organisations: on the one hand transferring risks yet, on the other, creating opportunities. A moral economy lens views employment as a relationship rooted in a web of social dependencies, and considers that ‘thick’ relations produce valuable ethical surpluses that represent mutuality and human flourishing. Applying such an approach to the analysis of contingent work enables a fresh interpretation of contradictory individual and collective outcomes observed in the research literature. We suggest that evaluations informed by moral economy offer a more holistic appraisal of HRM practices such as contingent work, where both economic and social opportunities and costs can be more fully seen. In this way we not only highlight the ethical inadequacies of neglecting the human in HRM, but also the conceptual pitfalls of analytically separating the economic from the social.

    KW - HRM

    KW - contingent work

    KW - human flourishing

    KW - ethics

    KW - moral economy

    KW - employment

    KW - contradictions

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869491222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s10551-012-1439-7

    DO - 10.1007/s10551-012-1439-7

    M3 - Article

    JO - Journal of Business Ethics

    JF - Journal of Business Ethics

    SN - 0167-4544

    ER -