Contesting neoliberal urbanism in Glasgow’s community gardens: the practice of DIY Citizenship

John Crossan, Andrew Cumbers, Robert McMaster, Deirdre Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this journal, it has been suggested that citizens practising community gardening “can become complicit in the construction of neoliberal hegemony”. Such hegemony is maintained, it is argued, through the day-to-day work of neoliberal citizen-subjects, which “alleviates the state from service provision”. In this paper we acknowledge that community gardens are vulnerable to neoliberal cooptation. But, even where neoliberal practices are evidenced, such practices do not define or foreclose other socio-political subjectivities at work in the gardens. We contend that community gardens in Glasgow
cultivate collective practices that offer us a glimpse of what a progressively transformative polity can achieve. Enabled by an interlocking process of community and spatial production, this form of citizen participation encourages us to reconsider our relationships with one another, our environment and what constitutes effective political practice. Inspired by a range of writings on citizenship formation we term this “Do-It-Yourself” (DIY) Citizenship.
LanguageEnglish
Pages937-955
Number of pages19
JournalAntipode: A Radical Jounal of Geography
Volume48
Issue number4
Early online date28 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

self-initiated work
citizenship
garden
hegemony
community
service provision
citizen
citizens' participation
subjectivity

Keywords

  • community gardens
  • democracy
  • citizenship
  • neoliberalism

Cite this

Crossan, John ; Cumbers, Andrew ; McMaster, Robert ; Shaw, Deirdre. / Contesting neoliberal urbanism in Glasgow’s community gardens : the practice of DIY Citizenship. In: Antipode: A Radical Jounal of Geography. 2016 ; Vol. 48, No. 4. pp. 937-955.
@article{075991faf44f4d528c3644296313c08c,
title = "Contesting neoliberal urbanism in Glasgow’s community gardens: the practice of DIY Citizenship",
abstract = "In this journal, it has been suggested that citizens practising community gardening “can become complicit in the construction of neoliberal hegemony”. Such hegemony is maintained, it is argued, through the day-to-day work of neoliberal citizen-subjects, which “alleviates the state from service provision”. In this paper we acknowledge that community gardens are vulnerable to neoliberal cooptation. But, even where neoliberal practices are evidenced, such practices do not define or foreclose other socio-political subjectivities at work in the gardens. We contend that community gardens in Glasgowcultivate collective practices that offer us a glimpse of what a progressively transformative polity can achieve. Enabled by an interlocking process of community and spatial production, this form of citizen participation encourages us to reconsider our relationships with one another, our environment and what constitutes effective political practice. Inspired by a range of writings on citizenship formation we term this “Do-It-Yourself” (DIY) Citizenship.",
keywords = "community gardens, democracy, citizenship, neoliberalism",
author = "John Crossan and Andrew Cumbers and Robert McMaster and Deirdre Shaw",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/anti.12220",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "937--955",
journal = "Antipode",
issn = "0066-4812",
number = "4",

}

Contesting neoliberal urbanism in Glasgow’s community gardens : the practice of DIY Citizenship. / Crossan, John; Cumbers, Andrew; McMaster, Robert; Shaw, Deirdre.

In: Antipode: A Radical Jounal of Geography, Vol. 48, No. 4, 30.09.2016, p. 937-955.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contesting neoliberal urbanism in Glasgow’s community gardens

T2 - Antipode

AU - Crossan, John

AU - Cumbers, Andrew

AU - McMaster, Robert

AU - Shaw, Deirdre

PY - 2016/9/30

Y1 - 2016/9/30

N2 - In this journal, it has been suggested that citizens practising community gardening “can become complicit in the construction of neoliberal hegemony”. Such hegemony is maintained, it is argued, through the day-to-day work of neoliberal citizen-subjects, which “alleviates the state from service provision”. In this paper we acknowledge that community gardens are vulnerable to neoliberal cooptation. But, even where neoliberal practices are evidenced, such practices do not define or foreclose other socio-political subjectivities at work in the gardens. We contend that community gardens in Glasgowcultivate collective practices that offer us a glimpse of what a progressively transformative polity can achieve. Enabled by an interlocking process of community and spatial production, this form of citizen participation encourages us to reconsider our relationships with one another, our environment and what constitutes effective political practice. Inspired by a range of writings on citizenship formation we term this “Do-It-Yourself” (DIY) Citizenship.

AB - In this journal, it has been suggested that citizens practising community gardening “can become complicit in the construction of neoliberal hegemony”. Such hegemony is maintained, it is argued, through the day-to-day work of neoliberal citizen-subjects, which “alleviates the state from service provision”. In this paper we acknowledge that community gardens are vulnerable to neoliberal cooptation. But, even where neoliberal practices are evidenced, such practices do not define or foreclose other socio-political subjectivities at work in the gardens. We contend that community gardens in Glasgowcultivate collective practices that offer us a glimpse of what a progressively transformative polity can achieve. Enabled by an interlocking process of community and spatial production, this form of citizen participation encourages us to reconsider our relationships with one another, our environment and what constitutes effective political practice. Inspired by a range of writings on citizenship formation we term this “Do-It-Yourself” (DIY) Citizenship.

KW - community gardens

KW - democracy

KW - citizenship

KW - neoliberalism

U2 - 10.1111/anti.12220

DO - 10.1111/anti.12220

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 937

EP - 955

JO - Antipode

JF - Antipode

SN - 0066-4812

IS - 4

ER -