Contemporary practices in social work supervision: time for new paradigms?

Trish Hafford-Letchfield, Lambert Englebrecht

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

2 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social work supervision is considered to be a core feature in the development of social work’s professional identity and practice and provides an important vehicle in which its outcomes are mediated and supported. Its key stakeholders may include people who use services, practitioners, and educators, those leading and managing services and organisations providing services. Good quality supervision has been cited as a potential pivot upon which the integrity and excellence of practice can be maintained. However, over the last two decades, much has been written about the impact of globalised social and political influences and economic changes impacting on social work. The status, purpose and epistemology of social work supervision in the literature have constantly been contested within this context resulting in its repositioning to serve more conservative and restrictive environments. These developments have also given rise to the emergence of contradictory viewpoints about the key purpose of supervision, its empirical basis and the need for a cultural shift to address tensions between technicist approaches and relationship-based approaches. It is therefore timely to review and review and re-examine the state of knowledge, research and practice about social work supervision and to capture any new developments that might inform critical practice, professional development and wellbeing as well as its wider impact on accountability, effectiveness and work performance. We are therefore really pleased to publish this themed issue in the European Journal of Social Work which has enabled us to bring together a very wide range of contributions capturing contemporary empirical evaluations of theoretical and practice models in supervision. These come from international perspectives in
regions including, West Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong-Kong, USA, Canada; Denmark, Israel, England, Scotland and Ireland. The range of papers in this collection has adopted global perspectives as well as empirical accounts of experiences and practices in supervision which are both action oriented and reflective.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)329-332
Number of pages3
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Work
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

supervision
social work
paradigm
political influence
West Africa
time
economic change
Denmark
epistemology
Singapore
Ireland
integrity
Hong Kong
New Zealand
Israel
stakeholder
Canada
educator
responsibility
evaluation

Keywords

  • social work
  • supervision
  • paradigms
  • editorial
  • special issue

Cite this

@article{51310ceb4a8e4691a847a4eb4ba72a75,
title = "Contemporary practices in social work supervision: time for new paradigms?",
abstract = "Social work supervision is considered to be a core feature in the development of social work’s professional identity and practice and provides an important vehicle in which its outcomes are mediated and supported. Its key stakeholders may include people who use services, practitioners, and educators, those leading and managing services and organisations providing services. Good quality supervision has been cited as a potential pivot upon which the integrity and excellence of practice can be maintained. However, over the last two decades, much has been written about the impact of globalised social and political influences and economic changes impacting on social work. The status, purpose and epistemology of social work supervision in the literature have constantly been contested within this context resulting in its repositioning to serve more conservative and restrictive environments. These developments have also given rise to the emergence of contradictory viewpoints about the key purpose of supervision, its empirical basis and the need for a cultural shift to address tensions between technicist approaches and relationship-based approaches. It is therefore timely to review and review and re-examine the state of knowledge, research and practice about social work supervision and to capture any new developments that might inform critical practice, professional development and wellbeing as well as its wider impact on accountability, effectiveness and work performance. We are therefore really pleased to publish this themed issue in the European Journal of Social Work which has enabled us to bring together a very wide range of contributions capturing contemporary empirical evaluations of theoretical and practice models in supervision. These come from international perspectives inregions including, West Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong-Kong, USA, Canada; Denmark, Israel, England, Scotland and Ireland. The range of papers in this collection has adopted global perspectives as well as empirical accounts of experiences and practices in supervision which are both action oriented and reflective.",
keywords = "social work, supervision, paradigms, editorial, special issue",
author = "Trish Hafford-Letchfield and Lambert Englebrecht",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1080/13691457.2018.1446782",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "329--332",
journal = "European Journal of Social Work",
issn = "1468-2664",
number = "3",

}

Contemporary practices in social work supervision : time for new paradigms? / Hafford-Letchfield, Trish; Englebrecht, Lambert.

In: European Journal of Social Work, Vol. 21, No. 3, 23.03.2018, p. 329-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contemporary practices in social work supervision

T2 - time for new paradigms?

AU - Hafford-Letchfield, Trish

AU - Englebrecht, Lambert

PY - 2018/3/23

Y1 - 2018/3/23

N2 - Social work supervision is considered to be a core feature in the development of social work’s professional identity and practice and provides an important vehicle in which its outcomes are mediated and supported. Its key stakeholders may include people who use services, practitioners, and educators, those leading and managing services and organisations providing services. Good quality supervision has been cited as a potential pivot upon which the integrity and excellence of practice can be maintained. However, over the last two decades, much has been written about the impact of globalised social and political influences and economic changes impacting on social work. The status, purpose and epistemology of social work supervision in the literature have constantly been contested within this context resulting in its repositioning to serve more conservative and restrictive environments. These developments have also given rise to the emergence of contradictory viewpoints about the key purpose of supervision, its empirical basis and the need for a cultural shift to address tensions between technicist approaches and relationship-based approaches. It is therefore timely to review and review and re-examine the state of knowledge, research and practice about social work supervision and to capture any new developments that might inform critical practice, professional development and wellbeing as well as its wider impact on accountability, effectiveness and work performance. We are therefore really pleased to publish this themed issue in the European Journal of Social Work which has enabled us to bring together a very wide range of contributions capturing contemporary empirical evaluations of theoretical and practice models in supervision. These come from international perspectives inregions including, West Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong-Kong, USA, Canada; Denmark, Israel, England, Scotland and Ireland. The range of papers in this collection has adopted global perspectives as well as empirical accounts of experiences and practices in supervision which are both action oriented and reflective.

AB - Social work supervision is considered to be a core feature in the development of social work’s professional identity and practice and provides an important vehicle in which its outcomes are mediated and supported. Its key stakeholders may include people who use services, practitioners, and educators, those leading and managing services and organisations providing services. Good quality supervision has been cited as a potential pivot upon which the integrity and excellence of practice can be maintained. However, over the last two decades, much has been written about the impact of globalised social and political influences and economic changes impacting on social work. The status, purpose and epistemology of social work supervision in the literature have constantly been contested within this context resulting in its repositioning to serve more conservative and restrictive environments. These developments have also given rise to the emergence of contradictory viewpoints about the key purpose of supervision, its empirical basis and the need for a cultural shift to address tensions between technicist approaches and relationship-based approaches. It is therefore timely to review and review and re-examine the state of knowledge, research and practice about social work supervision and to capture any new developments that might inform critical practice, professional development and wellbeing as well as its wider impact on accountability, effectiveness and work performance. We are therefore really pleased to publish this themed issue in the European Journal of Social Work which has enabled us to bring together a very wide range of contributions capturing contemporary empirical evaluations of theoretical and practice models in supervision. These come from international perspectives inregions including, West Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, Hong-Kong, USA, Canada; Denmark, Israel, England, Scotland and Ireland. The range of papers in this collection has adopted global perspectives as well as empirical accounts of experiences and practices in supervision which are both action oriented and reflective.

KW - social work

KW - supervision

KW - paradigms

KW - editorial

KW - special issue

U2 - 10.1080/13691457.2018.1446782

DO - 10.1080/13691457.2018.1446782

M3 - Editorial

VL - 21

SP - 329

EP - 332

JO - European Journal of Social Work

JF - European Journal of Social Work

SN - 1468-2664

IS - 3

ER -