Consultation and illness behaviour in response to symptoms: A comparison of models from different disciplinary frameworks and suggestions for future research directions

Sally Wyke, Joy Adamson, Diane Dixon, Kate Hunt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We all get ill and social scientific interest in how we respond - the study of illness behaviour - continues unabated. Existing models are useful, but have been developed and applied within disciplinary silos, resulting in wasted intellectual and empirical effort and an absence of accumulation of knowledge across disciplines. We present a critical review and detailed comparison of three process models of response to symptoms: the Illness Action Model, the Common Sense Model of the Self-Regulation of Health and Illness and the Network Episode Model. We suggest an integrated framework in which symptoms, responses and actions are simultaneously interpreted and evaluated in the light of accumulated knowledge and through interactions. Evaluation may be subconscious and is influenced by the extent to which the symptoms impose themselves, expectations of outcomes, the resources available and understanding of symptoms' salience and possible outcomes. Actions taken are part of a process of problem solving through which both individuals and their immediate social network seek to (re)achieve 'normality'. Response is also influenced by social structure (directly and indirectly), cultural expectations of health, the meaning of symptoms, and access to and understandings of the legitimate use of services. Changes in knowledge, in embodied state and in emotions can all be directly influential at any point. We do not underestimate the difficulty of operationalising an integrated framework at different levels of analysis. Attempts to do so will require us to move easily between disciplinary understandings to conduct prospective, longitudinal, research that uses novel methodologies to investigate response to symptoms in the context of affective as well as cognitive responses and interactions within social networks. While challenging such an approach would facilitate accumulation of knowledge across disciplines and enable movement beyond description to change in individual and organisational responses.
LanguageEnglish
Pages79-87
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume86
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Illness Behavior
Social Support
Referral and Consultation
illness
Health
Emotions
social network
Research
normality
interaction
self-regulation
health
social structure
emotion
Direction compound
Illness
methodology
evaluation
resources
Self-Control

Keywords

  • illness behaviour
  • response to symptoms
  • comparison models
  • frameworks
  • future research directions
  • social networks
  • symptoms and emotions
  • integrated symptom-response framework
  • symptoms
  • consulting behaviour
  • illness career
  • access to healthcare
  • health service utilisation
  • psychology
  • sociology

Cite this

@article{c1f8938e2f7c45b2bedc69e684f5881a,
title = "Consultation and illness behaviour in response to symptoms: A comparison of models from different disciplinary frameworks and suggestions for future research directions",
abstract = "We all get ill and social scientific interest in how we respond - the study of illness behaviour - continues unabated. Existing models are useful, but have been developed and applied within disciplinary silos, resulting in wasted intellectual and empirical effort and an absence of accumulation of knowledge across disciplines. We present a critical review and detailed comparison of three process models of response to symptoms: the Illness Action Model, the Common Sense Model of the Self-Regulation of Health and Illness and the Network Episode Model. We suggest an integrated framework in which symptoms, responses and actions are simultaneously interpreted and evaluated in the light of accumulated knowledge and through interactions. Evaluation may be subconscious and is influenced by the extent to which the symptoms impose themselves, expectations of outcomes, the resources available and understanding of symptoms' salience and possible outcomes. Actions taken are part of a process of problem solving through which both individuals and their immediate social network seek to (re)achieve 'normality'. Response is also influenced by social structure (directly and indirectly), cultural expectations of health, the meaning of symptoms, and access to and understandings of the legitimate use of services. Changes in knowledge, in embodied state and in emotions can all be directly influential at any point. We do not underestimate the difficulty of operationalising an integrated framework at different levels of analysis. Attempts to do so will require us to move easily between disciplinary understandings to conduct prospective, longitudinal, research that uses novel methodologies to investigate response to symptoms in the context of affective as well as cognitive responses and interactions within social networks. While challenging such an approach would facilitate accumulation of knowledge across disciplines and enable movement beyond description to change in individual and organisational responses.",
keywords = "illness behaviour, response to symptoms, comparison models, frameworks, future research directions, social networks, symptoms and emotions, integrated symptom-response framework, symptoms, consulting behaviour, illness career, access to healthcare, health service utilisation, psychology , sociology",
author = "Sally Wyke and Joy Adamson and Diane Dixon and Kate Hunt",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "79--87",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consultation and illness behaviour in response to symptoms

T2 - Social Science and Medicine

AU - Wyke, Sally

AU - Adamson, Joy

AU - Dixon, Diane

AU - Hunt, Kate

N1 - Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2013/6/1

Y1 - 2013/6/1

N2 - We all get ill and social scientific interest in how we respond - the study of illness behaviour - continues unabated. Existing models are useful, but have been developed and applied within disciplinary silos, resulting in wasted intellectual and empirical effort and an absence of accumulation of knowledge across disciplines. We present a critical review and detailed comparison of three process models of response to symptoms: the Illness Action Model, the Common Sense Model of the Self-Regulation of Health and Illness and the Network Episode Model. We suggest an integrated framework in which symptoms, responses and actions are simultaneously interpreted and evaluated in the light of accumulated knowledge and through interactions. Evaluation may be subconscious and is influenced by the extent to which the symptoms impose themselves, expectations of outcomes, the resources available and understanding of symptoms' salience and possible outcomes. Actions taken are part of a process of problem solving through which both individuals and their immediate social network seek to (re)achieve 'normality'. Response is also influenced by social structure (directly and indirectly), cultural expectations of health, the meaning of symptoms, and access to and understandings of the legitimate use of services. Changes in knowledge, in embodied state and in emotions can all be directly influential at any point. We do not underestimate the difficulty of operationalising an integrated framework at different levels of analysis. Attempts to do so will require us to move easily between disciplinary understandings to conduct prospective, longitudinal, research that uses novel methodologies to investigate response to symptoms in the context of affective as well as cognitive responses and interactions within social networks. While challenging such an approach would facilitate accumulation of knowledge across disciplines and enable movement beyond description to change in individual and organisational responses.

AB - We all get ill and social scientific interest in how we respond - the study of illness behaviour - continues unabated. Existing models are useful, but have been developed and applied within disciplinary silos, resulting in wasted intellectual and empirical effort and an absence of accumulation of knowledge across disciplines. We present a critical review and detailed comparison of three process models of response to symptoms: the Illness Action Model, the Common Sense Model of the Self-Regulation of Health and Illness and the Network Episode Model. We suggest an integrated framework in which symptoms, responses and actions are simultaneously interpreted and evaluated in the light of accumulated knowledge and through interactions. Evaluation may be subconscious and is influenced by the extent to which the symptoms impose themselves, expectations of outcomes, the resources available and understanding of symptoms' salience and possible outcomes. Actions taken are part of a process of problem solving through which both individuals and their immediate social network seek to (re)achieve 'normality'. Response is also influenced by social structure (directly and indirectly), cultural expectations of health, the meaning of symptoms, and access to and understandings of the legitimate use of services. Changes in knowledge, in embodied state and in emotions can all be directly influential at any point. We do not underestimate the difficulty of operationalising an integrated framework at different levels of analysis. Attempts to do so will require us to move easily between disciplinary understandings to conduct prospective, longitudinal, research that uses novel methodologies to investigate response to symptoms in the context of affective as well as cognitive responses and interactions within social networks. While challenging such an approach would facilitate accumulation of knowledge across disciplines and enable movement beyond description to change in individual and organisational responses.

KW - illness behaviour

KW - response to symptoms

KW - comparison models

KW - frameworks

KW - future research directions

KW - social networks

KW - symptoms and emotions

KW - integrated symptom-response framework

KW - symptoms

KW - consulting behaviour

KW - illness career

KW - access to healthcare

KW - health service utilisation

KW - psychology

KW - sociology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876733120&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 79

EP - 87

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -