Construction site management team working: a serendipitous event

S Tennant, David Langford, Michael Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the pervasive appeal of team working in the construction industry, the empirical relationship between team effectiveness and task performance continues to be generally overlooked. Recognized team performance appraisal remains one of the last frontiers of performance management. This paper sets out to challenge the conventional discourse of team working and test the hypothesis that construction site management team working and project performance is unrelated. The explanatory case-study research method utilizes a variety of data-gathering techniques. An attitude statement questionnaire evaluates team efficacy. A customized suite of key performance indicators sympathetic to project performance is used to measure project success. Statistical examination of the data demonstrates a marked correlation between the two variables. Although the results authenticate the universally acclaimed wisdom; teams and performance are inextricably linked, secondary analysis expose widespread contradictions between the rhetoric of team working and the action of practice. Obstacles to team working include management indifference towards substantive team building, organizational barriers to communication, and the absence of team rewards. A paradigm of individualism predominates, abetted by organizational structures and cultural subsystems that uphold individual answerability at the expense of collective responsibility.
LanguageEnglish
Pages220-228
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Management in Engineering
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date15 Sep 2011
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Construction industry
Communication
Team working
Construction sites
Project performance
Performance appraisal
Performance management
Team building
Effectiveness performance
Team performance
Team effectiveness
Efficacy
Research methods
Project success
Expenses
Paradigm
Wisdom
Case study research
Individualism
Subsystem

Keywords

  • construction site
  • team working
  • management

Cite this

@article{ff01a52f020f4b449c41b13a1fc465c6,
title = "Construction site management team working: a serendipitous event",
abstract = "Despite the pervasive appeal of team working in the construction industry, the empirical relationship between team effectiveness and task performance continues to be generally overlooked. Recognized team performance appraisal remains one of the last frontiers of performance management. This paper sets out to challenge the conventional discourse of team working and test the hypothesis that construction site management team working and project performance is unrelated. The explanatory case-study research method utilizes a variety of data-gathering techniques. An attitude statement questionnaire evaluates team efficacy. A customized suite of key performance indicators sympathetic to project performance is used to measure project success. Statistical examination of the data demonstrates a marked correlation between the two variables. Although the results authenticate the universally acclaimed wisdom; teams and performance are inextricably linked, secondary analysis expose widespread contradictions between the rhetoric of team working and the action of practice. Obstacles to team working include management indifference towards substantive team building, organizational barriers to communication, and the absence of team rewards. A paradigm of individualism predominates, abetted by organizational structures and cultural subsystems that uphold individual answerability at the expense of collective responsibility.",
keywords = "construction site, team working, management",
author = "S Tennant and David Langford and Michael Murray",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000053",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "220--228",
journal = "Journal of Management in Engineering",
issn = "0742-597X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

Construction site management team working : a serendipitous event. / Tennant, S; Langford, David; Murray, Michael.

In: Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 4, 10.2011, p. 220-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construction site management team working

T2 - Journal of Management in Engineering

AU - Tennant, S

AU - Langford, David

AU - Murray, Michael

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Despite the pervasive appeal of team working in the construction industry, the empirical relationship between team effectiveness and task performance continues to be generally overlooked. Recognized team performance appraisal remains one of the last frontiers of performance management. This paper sets out to challenge the conventional discourse of team working and test the hypothesis that construction site management team working and project performance is unrelated. The explanatory case-study research method utilizes a variety of data-gathering techniques. An attitude statement questionnaire evaluates team efficacy. A customized suite of key performance indicators sympathetic to project performance is used to measure project success. Statistical examination of the data demonstrates a marked correlation between the two variables. Although the results authenticate the universally acclaimed wisdom; teams and performance are inextricably linked, secondary analysis expose widespread contradictions between the rhetoric of team working and the action of practice. Obstacles to team working include management indifference towards substantive team building, organizational barriers to communication, and the absence of team rewards. A paradigm of individualism predominates, abetted by organizational structures and cultural subsystems that uphold individual answerability at the expense of collective responsibility.

AB - Despite the pervasive appeal of team working in the construction industry, the empirical relationship between team effectiveness and task performance continues to be generally overlooked. Recognized team performance appraisal remains one of the last frontiers of performance management. This paper sets out to challenge the conventional discourse of team working and test the hypothesis that construction site management team working and project performance is unrelated. The explanatory case-study research method utilizes a variety of data-gathering techniques. An attitude statement questionnaire evaluates team efficacy. A customized suite of key performance indicators sympathetic to project performance is used to measure project success. Statistical examination of the data demonstrates a marked correlation between the two variables. Although the results authenticate the universally acclaimed wisdom; teams and performance are inextricably linked, secondary analysis expose widespread contradictions between the rhetoric of team working and the action of practice. Obstacles to team working include management indifference towards substantive team building, organizational barriers to communication, and the absence of team rewards. A paradigm of individualism predominates, abetted by organizational structures and cultural subsystems that uphold individual answerability at the expense of collective responsibility.

KW - construction site

KW - team working

KW - management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855224803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://ascelibrary.org/meo/resource/1/jmenea#

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000053

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000053

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 220

EP - 228

JO - Journal of Management in Engineering

JF - Journal of Management in Engineering

SN - 0742-597X

IS - 4

ER -