Construction procurement: redefining the contours of organizational structures in procurement

John Tookey, Michael Murray, Cliff Hardcastle, David Langford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Today there are a number of different types of procurement routes available for clients to choose from. Each different type of procurement (traditional, design and build, management, etc.) has its own proponents and inherent strengths and weaknesses. Selection of optimal procurement systems is difficult, because even experienced clients cannot know all the potential benefits or risks for each system. Procurement is, therefore, a succession of ‘calculated risks’. Industry and academia have focussed research on reducing procurement risk through better procurement-system selection methods. Current research considers procurement as a set of rationalistic decisions within a closed environment, aiming to produce generic, prescriptive rules for clients and advisers to use to select the ‘best’ procurement route for their project. This paper seeks to identify whether prescriptive procurement guidance was adhered to on a set of case study projects. It was found that clients usually selected appropriate procurement systems, and where an inappropriate system was selected, alterations were made in contract form to incorporate aspects of the ‘best’ procurement route.
LanguageEnglish
Pages20-30
Number of pages11
JournalEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Optimal systems
Procurement
Organizational structure
Industry

Keywords

  • client objectives
  • construction procurement
  • procurement routes

Cite this

@article{7f7ebd20174044f5a6b2331e2d7920b0,
title = "Construction procurement: redefining the contours of organizational structures in procurement",
abstract = "Today there are a number of different types of procurement routes available for clients to choose from. Each different type of procurement (traditional, design and build, management, etc.) has its own proponents and inherent strengths and weaknesses. Selection of optimal procurement systems is difficult, because even experienced clients cannot know all the potential benefits or risks for each system. Procurement is, therefore, a succession of ‘calculated risks’. Industry and academia have focussed research on reducing procurement risk through better procurement-system selection methods. Current research considers procurement as a set of rationalistic decisions within a closed environment, aiming to produce generic, prescriptive rules for clients and advisers to use to select the ‘best’ procurement route for their project. This paper seeks to identify whether prescriptive procurement guidance was adhered to on a set of case study projects. It was found that clients usually selected appropriate procurement systems, and where an inappropriate system was selected, alterations were made in contract form to incorporate aspects of the ‘best’ procurement route.",
keywords = "client objectives, construction procurement, procurement routes",
author = "John Tookey and Michael Murray and Cliff Hardcastle and David Langford",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1108/eb021167",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "20--30",
journal = "Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management",
issn = "0969-9988",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "1",

}

Construction procurement : redefining the contours of organizational structures in procurement. / Tookey, John; Murray, Michael; Hardcastle, Cliff; Langford, David.

In: Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2001, p. 20-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Construction procurement

T2 - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

AU - Tookey, John

AU - Murray, Michael

AU - Hardcastle, Cliff

AU - Langford, David

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Today there are a number of different types of procurement routes available for clients to choose from. Each different type of procurement (traditional, design and build, management, etc.) has its own proponents and inherent strengths and weaknesses. Selection of optimal procurement systems is difficult, because even experienced clients cannot know all the potential benefits or risks for each system. Procurement is, therefore, a succession of ‘calculated risks’. Industry and academia have focussed research on reducing procurement risk through better procurement-system selection methods. Current research considers procurement as a set of rationalistic decisions within a closed environment, aiming to produce generic, prescriptive rules for clients and advisers to use to select the ‘best’ procurement route for their project. This paper seeks to identify whether prescriptive procurement guidance was adhered to on a set of case study projects. It was found that clients usually selected appropriate procurement systems, and where an inappropriate system was selected, alterations were made in contract form to incorporate aspects of the ‘best’ procurement route.

AB - Today there are a number of different types of procurement routes available for clients to choose from. Each different type of procurement (traditional, design and build, management, etc.) has its own proponents and inherent strengths and weaknesses. Selection of optimal procurement systems is difficult, because even experienced clients cannot know all the potential benefits or risks for each system. Procurement is, therefore, a succession of ‘calculated risks’. Industry and academia have focussed research on reducing procurement risk through better procurement-system selection methods. Current research considers procurement as a set of rationalistic decisions within a closed environment, aiming to produce generic, prescriptive rules for clients and advisers to use to select the ‘best’ procurement route for their project. This paper seeks to identify whether prescriptive procurement guidance was adhered to on a set of case study projects. It was found that clients usually selected appropriate procurement systems, and where an inappropriate system was selected, alterations were made in contract form to incorporate aspects of the ‘best’ procurement route.

KW - client objectives

KW - construction procurement

KW - procurement routes

U2 - 10.1108/eb021167

DO - 10.1108/eb021167

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 20

EP - 30

JO - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

JF - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

SN - 0969-9988

IS - 1

ER -