Construction mediation in Scotland: an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Recent research on Construction Mediation in Scotland has focused exclusively on Construction Lawyers' and Contractors' interaction with the process, without reference to the views of Mediators themselves. This paper seeks to address the knowledge gap, by exploring the attitudes and experiences of Mediators relative to the process, based on research with practitioners in Scotland. Based on a modest sample, the survey results indicate a lack of awareness of the process within the construction industry, mediations were generally successful and success depended in large measure to the skills of the mediator and willingness by the parties to compromise. Conversely, the results indicate that mediations failed because of ignorance, intransigence and over-confidence of the parties. Barriers to greater use of mediation in construction disputes were identified as the lack of skilled, experienced mediators, the continued popularity of adjudication, and both lawyer and party resistance. Notwithstanding the English experience, Scottish mediators gave little support for mandating disputants to mediate before proceeding with court action. A surprising number were willing to give an evaluation of the dispute rather than merely facilitating a settlement. The research concludes that, in Scotland, mediation had not yet become the indispensable tool for those seeking to resolve construction disputes due to lack of support from disputing parties, their advisors and the judiciary.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK
EditorsA. Raiden, E. Aboagye-Nimo
Pages583-591
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 10 Sep 2014

Fingerprint

mediation
experience
lawyer
lack
Construction industry
knowledge gap
Contractors
construction industry
judiciary
compromise
popularity
confidence
interaction
evaluation

Keywords

  • construction lawyers
  • end-users
  • mediation
  • Scotland
  • construction industry

Cite this

Agapiou, A., & Clark, B. (2014). Construction mediation in Scotland: an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners. In A. Raiden, & E. Aboagye-Nimo (Eds.), Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK (pp. 583-591)
Agapiou, Andrew ; Clark, Bryan. / Construction mediation in Scotland : an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners. Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK. editor / A. Raiden ; E. Aboagye-Nimo. 2014. pp. 583-591
@inbook{a9c8bd8f71514f8a9a34bbceca30d627,
title = "Construction mediation in Scotland: an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners",
abstract = "Recent research on Construction Mediation in Scotland has focused exclusively on Construction Lawyers' and Contractors' interaction with the process, without reference to the views of Mediators themselves. This paper seeks to address the knowledge gap, by exploring the attitudes and experiences of Mediators relative to the process, based on research with practitioners in Scotland. Based on a modest sample, the survey results indicate a lack of awareness of the process within the construction industry, mediations were generally successful and success depended in large measure to the skills of the mediator and willingness by the parties to compromise. Conversely, the results indicate that mediations failed because of ignorance, intransigence and over-confidence of the parties. Barriers to greater use of mediation in construction disputes were identified as the lack of skilled, experienced mediators, the continued popularity of adjudication, and both lawyer and party resistance. Notwithstanding the English experience, Scottish mediators gave little support for mandating disputants to mediate before proceeding with court action. A surprising number were willing to give an evaluation of the dispute rather than merely facilitating a settlement. The research concludes that, in Scotland, mediation had not yet become the indispensable tool for those seeking to resolve construction disputes due to lack of support from disputing parties, their advisors and the judiciary.",
keywords = "construction lawyers, end-users, mediation, Scotland, construction industry",
author = "Andrew Agapiou and Bryan Clark",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780955239083",
pages = "583--591",
editor = "A. Raiden and E. Aboagye-Nimo",
booktitle = "Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK",

}

Agapiou, A & Clark, B 2014, Construction mediation in Scotland: an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners. in A Raiden & E Aboagye-Nimo (eds), Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK. pp. 583-591.

Construction mediation in Scotland : an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners. / Agapiou, Andrew; Clark, Bryan.

Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK. ed. / A. Raiden; E. Aboagye-Nimo. 2014. p. 583-591.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Construction mediation in Scotland

T2 - an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners

AU - Agapiou, Andrew

AU - Clark, Bryan

PY - 2014/9/10

Y1 - 2014/9/10

N2 - Recent research on Construction Mediation in Scotland has focused exclusively on Construction Lawyers' and Contractors' interaction with the process, without reference to the views of Mediators themselves. This paper seeks to address the knowledge gap, by exploring the attitudes and experiences of Mediators relative to the process, based on research with practitioners in Scotland. Based on a modest sample, the survey results indicate a lack of awareness of the process within the construction industry, mediations were generally successful and success depended in large measure to the skills of the mediator and willingness by the parties to compromise. Conversely, the results indicate that mediations failed because of ignorance, intransigence and over-confidence of the parties. Barriers to greater use of mediation in construction disputes were identified as the lack of skilled, experienced mediators, the continued popularity of adjudication, and both lawyer and party resistance. Notwithstanding the English experience, Scottish mediators gave little support for mandating disputants to mediate before proceeding with court action. A surprising number were willing to give an evaluation of the dispute rather than merely facilitating a settlement. The research concludes that, in Scotland, mediation had not yet become the indispensable tool for those seeking to resolve construction disputes due to lack of support from disputing parties, their advisors and the judiciary.

AB - Recent research on Construction Mediation in Scotland has focused exclusively on Construction Lawyers' and Contractors' interaction with the process, without reference to the views of Mediators themselves. This paper seeks to address the knowledge gap, by exploring the attitudes and experiences of Mediators relative to the process, based on research with practitioners in Scotland. Based on a modest sample, the survey results indicate a lack of awareness of the process within the construction industry, mediations were generally successful and success depended in large measure to the skills of the mediator and willingness by the parties to compromise. Conversely, the results indicate that mediations failed because of ignorance, intransigence and over-confidence of the parties. Barriers to greater use of mediation in construction disputes were identified as the lack of skilled, experienced mediators, the continued popularity of adjudication, and both lawyer and party resistance. Notwithstanding the English experience, Scottish mediators gave little support for mandating disputants to mediate before proceeding with court action. A surprising number were willing to give an evaluation of the dispute rather than merely facilitating a settlement. The research concludes that, in Scotland, mediation had not yet become the indispensable tool for those seeking to resolve construction disputes due to lack of support from disputing parties, their advisors and the judiciary.

KW - construction lawyers

KW - end-users

KW - mediation

KW - Scotland

KW - construction industry

UR - http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2014-0583-0591_Agapiou_Clark.pdf

UR - http://www.arcom.ac.uk/

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780955239083

SP - 583

EP - 591

BT - Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK

A2 - Raiden, A.

A2 - Aboagye-Nimo, E.

ER -

Agapiou A, Clark B. Construction mediation in Scotland: an investigation into attitudes and experiences of mediation practitioners. In Raiden A, Aboagye-Nimo E, editors, Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference, 1-3 September 2014 , Portsmouth, UK. 2014. p. 583-591