Constructing 'the anti-globalisation movement'

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article interrogates the claim that a transnational anti-globalisation social movement has emerged. I draw on constructivist social movement theory, globalisation studies, feminist praxis and activist websites to make two main arguments, mapping on to the two parts of the article. First, a movement has indeed emerged, albeit in a highly contested and complex form with activists, opponents and commentators constructing competing movement identities. This article is itself complicit in such a process – and seeks to further a particular construction of the movement as a site of radical-democratic politics. Second, the movement is not anti-globalisation in any straightforward sense. Focusing their opposition on globalised neoliberalism and corporate power, activists represent their movement either as anti-capitalist or as constructing alternative kinds of globalised relationships. Threading through both my arguments is a normative plea to confront the diverse relations of power involved in both globalisation and movement construction in order that globalised solidarities be truly democratic. This is to challenge hierarchical visions of how best to construct ‘the anti-globalisation movement’.
LanguageEnglish
Pages61-84
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Journal of Peace Studies
Volume9
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

globalization
social movement
neoliberalism
solidarity
website
opposition
politics

Keywords

  • peace studies
  • anti-globalisation movement
  • globalisation

Cite this

@article{321026b3dacb45169cde07084c00b23d,
title = "Constructing 'the anti-globalisation movement'",
abstract = "This article interrogates the claim that a transnational anti-globalisation social movement has emerged. I draw on constructivist social movement theory, globalisation studies, feminist praxis and activist websites to make two main arguments, mapping on to the two parts of the article. First, a movement has indeed emerged, albeit in a highly contested and complex form with activists, opponents and commentators constructing competing movement identities. This article is itself complicit in such a process – and seeks to further a particular construction of the movement as a site of radical-democratic politics. Second, the movement is not anti-globalisation in any straightforward sense. Focusing their opposition on globalised neoliberalism and corporate power, activists represent their movement either as anti-capitalist or as constructing alternative kinds of globalised relationships. Threading through both my arguments is a normative plea to confront the diverse relations of power involved in both globalisation and movement construction in order that globalised solidarities be truly democratic. This is to challenge hierarchical visions of how best to construct ‘the anti-globalisation movement’.",
keywords = "peace studies, anti-globalisation movement, globalisation",
author = "Catherine Eschle",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "61--84",
journal = "International Journal of Peace Studies",
issn = "1085-7494",
publisher = "Grassroots Publishing Co.",
number = "1",

}

Constructing 'the anti-globalisation movement'. / Eschle, Catherine.

In: International Journal of Peace Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2004, p. 61-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing 'the anti-globalisation movement'

AU - Eschle, Catherine

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This article interrogates the claim that a transnational anti-globalisation social movement has emerged. I draw on constructivist social movement theory, globalisation studies, feminist praxis and activist websites to make two main arguments, mapping on to the two parts of the article. First, a movement has indeed emerged, albeit in a highly contested and complex form with activists, opponents and commentators constructing competing movement identities. This article is itself complicit in such a process – and seeks to further a particular construction of the movement as a site of radical-democratic politics. Second, the movement is not anti-globalisation in any straightforward sense. Focusing their opposition on globalised neoliberalism and corporate power, activists represent their movement either as anti-capitalist or as constructing alternative kinds of globalised relationships. Threading through both my arguments is a normative plea to confront the diverse relations of power involved in both globalisation and movement construction in order that globalised solidarities be truly democratic. This is to challenge hierarchical visions of how best to construct ‘the anti-globalisation movement’.

AB - This article interrogates the claim that a transnational anti-globalisation social movement has emerged. I draw on constructivist social movement theory, globalisation studies, feminist praxis and activist websites to make two main arguments, mapping on to the two parts of the article. First, a movement has indeed emerged, albeit in a highly contested and complex form with activists, opponents and commentators constructing competing movement identities. This article is itself complicit in such a process – and seeks to further a particular construction of the movement as a site of radical-democratic politics. Second, the movement is not anti-globalisation in any straightforward sense. Focusing their opposition on globalised neoliberalism and corporate power, activists represent their movement either as anti-capitalist or as constructing alternative kinds of globalised relationships. Threading through both my arguments is a normative plea to confront the diverse relations of power involved in both globalisation and movement construction in order that globalised solidarities be truly democratic. This is to challenge hierarchical visions of how best to construct ‘the anti-globalisation movement’.

KW - peace studies

KW - anti-globalisation movement

KW - globalisation

UR - http://www.gmu.edu/programs/icar/ijps/vol9_1/Eschle_91IJPS.pdf

UR - http://www.gmu.edu/programs/icar/ijps/vol9_1/cover9_1.htm

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 61

EP - 84

JO - International Journal of Peace Studies

T2 - International Journal of Peace Studies

JF - International Journal of Peace Studies

SN - 1085-7494

IS - 1

ER -