Constructing and contesting markets through the market object

John Finch, Susi Geiger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the work that market actors undertake in order to stabilize and de-stabilize market objects. We briefly revisit Igor Ansoff's classic product–market strategy matrix to show how marketing management literature typically equates stability in markets with commodification and inertia. To escape this inertia, marketers often ‘warm up’ or destabilize existing market objects by changing the material bases of the object, for instance in incremental product development. But this ‘warming up’ invites other market actors to also question or destabilize the networks that are supposed to hold the market object in its new (market) space. We utilize archival research to trace one case each of market and product development within the pharmaceutical realm, demonstrating: first, the effort market actors put into ‘cooling down’ and ‘warming up’ market objects; second, how contested such efforts can be; and third, how the object's material attachments may limit its symbolic malleability.
LanguageEnglish
Pages899-906
Number of pages8
JournalIndustrial Marketing Management
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011

Fingerprint

Inertia
Product development
Commodification
Incremental
Cooling
Marketing management
Market development
Pharmaceuticals
Market strategy
Archival research
Market work
New markets
Marketers
Product market

Keywords

  • market studies
  • pharmaceuticals
  • product development
  • market development
  • objectification work

Cite this

Finch, John ; Geiger, Susi. / Constructing and contesting markets through the market object. In: Industrial Marketing Management. 2011 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 899-906.
@article{40e4d35a81074161b011c0cedb7a7c8b,
title = "Constructing and contesting markets through the market object",
abstract = "This paper focuses on the work that market actors undertake in order to stabilize and de-stabilize market objects. We briefly revisit Igor Ansoff's classic product–market strategy matrix to show how marketing management literature typically equates stability in markets with commodification and inertia. To escape this inertia, marketers often ‘warm up’ or destabilize existing market objects by changing the material bases of the object, for instance in incremental product development. But this ‘warming up’ invites other market actors to also question or destabilize the networks that are supposed to hold the market object in its new (market) space. We utilize archival research to trace one case each of market and product development within the pharmaceutical realm, demonstrating: first, the effort market actors put into ‘cooling down’ and ‘warming up’ market objects; second, how contested such efforts can be; and third, how the object's material attachments may limit its symbolic malleability.",
keywords = "market studies, pharmaceuticals, product development, market development, objectification work",
author = "John Finch and Susi Geiger",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
doi = "doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.034",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "899--906",
journal = "Industrial Marketing Management",
issn = "0019-8501",
number = "6",

}

Constructing and contesting markets through the market object. / Finch, John; Geiger, Susi.

In: Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 40, No. 6, 08.2011, p. 899-906.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constructing and contesting markets through the market object

AU - Finch, John

AU - Geiger, Susi

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - This paper focuses on the work that market actors undertake in order to stabilize and de-stabilize market objects. We briefly revisit Igor Ansoff's classic product–market strategy matrix to show how marketing management literature typically equates stability in markets with commodification and inertia. To escape this inertia, marketers often ‘warm up’ or destabilize existing market objects by changing the material bases of the object, for instance in incremental product development. But this ‘warming up’ invites other market actors to also question or destabilize the networks that are supposed to hold the market object in its new (market) space. We utilize archival research to trace one case each of market and product development within the pharmaceutical realm, demonstrating: first, the effort market actors put into ‘cooling down’ and ‘warming up’ market objects; second, how contested such efforts can be; and third, how the object's material attachments may limit its symbolic malleability.

AB - This paper focuses on the work that market actors undertake in order to stabilize and de-stabilize market objects. We briefly revisit Igor Ansoff's classic product–market strategy matrix to show how marketing management literature typically equates stability in markets with commodification and inertia. To escape this inertia, marketers often ‘warm up’ or destabilize existing market objects by changing the material bases of the object, for instance in incremental product development. But this ‘warming up’ invites other market actors to also question or destabilize the networks that are supposed to hold the market object in its new (market) space. We utilize archival research to trace one case each of market and product development within the pharmaceutical realm, demonstrating: first, the effort market actors put into ‘cooling down’ and ‘warming up’ market objects; second, how contested such efforts can be; and third, how the object's material attachments may limit its symbolic malleability.

KW - market studies

KW - pharmaceuticals

KW - product development

KW - market development

KW - objectification work

U2 - doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.034

DO - doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.034

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 899

EP - 906

JO - Industrial Marketing Management

T2 - Industrial Marketing Management

JF - Industrial Marketing Management

SN - 0019-8501

IS - 6

ER -