Abstract
The United Kingdom that voted in 1975 on whether to remain in what was then the European Economic Community was a unitary state with a single legislature and single source of sovereign authority. Direct rule had recently been restored in Northern Ireland, and its devolved Parliament abolished; 1 devolution to Scotland and Wal es was under discussion, but no firm proposals were yet being considered. The referendum vote was counted on a territorial basis, and there was concern about the political implications of a territorially - divided result, particularly in the context of rising Scottish nationalism. But it would have been difficult to argue that territorial difference — which in the event never materialised — was constitutionally relevant.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The UK Constitution after Miller |
| Subtitle of host publication | Brexit and Beyond |
| Editors | Mark Elliott, Jack Williams, Alison Young |
| Place of Publication | London |
| Chapter | 7 |
| Publication status | Published - 26 Jul 2018 |
Keywords
- Brexit
- European law
- constitutional change
- European Union
- EU
- UK Government
- devolved administrations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Constitutional change and territorial consent: The Miller Case and the Sewel Convention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver