Consolidation and public opinion in South Africa

Robert Mattes, Herman Thiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As recently as January 1990, almost all observers would have agreed that the odds were stacked heavily against a successful transition to democracy in South Africa. In the aftermath of the “miracle election” of April 1994, however, the odds might appear, at first glance, to favor a successful consolidation of South African democracy. For the overwhelming majority of South Africa’s citizens, long deprived of self-government and common citizenship on the basis of race, a return to the old regime of apartheid obviously is not an option. Democracy, rather than vengeance or group power, has long been a cherished goal for black South Africans and was the mantra of the African National Congress (ANC) and the bulk of those involved in the grassroots struggle against apartheid. Moreover, while white South Africans benefited from apartheid, they have had long experience with competitive elections and Westminster-style parliamentary politics, albeit based on exclusionary and racially defined citizenship.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-110
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Democracy
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1998

Fingerprint

apartheid
consolidation
public opinion
democracy
citizenship
election
ANC
regime
citizen
politics
experience
Group

Keywords

  • South Africa
  • African National Congress (ANC)
  • apartheid

Cite this

Mattes, Robert ; Thiel, Herman. / Consolidation and public opinion in South Africa. In: Journal of Democracy. 1998 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 95-110.
@article{8bf35d1f41fb4b81a26653b2850d2ac9,
title = "Consolidation and public opinion in South Africa",
abstract = "As recently as January 1990, almost all observers would have agreed that the odds were stacked heavily against a successful transition to democracy in South Africa. In the aftermath of the “miracle election” of April 1994, however, the odds might appear, at first glance, to favor a successful consolidation of South African democracy. For the overwhelming majority of South Africa’s citizens, long deprived of self-government and common citizenship on the basis of race, a return to the old regime of apartheid obviously is not an option. Democracy, rather than vengeance or group power, has long been a cherished goal for black South Africans and was the mantra of the African National Congress (ANC) and the bulk of those involved in the grassroots struggle against apartheid. Moreover, while white South Africans benefited from apartheid, they have had long experience with competitive elections and Westminster-style parliamentary politics, albeit based on exclusionary and racially defined citizenship.",
keywords = "South Africa, African National Congress (ANC), apartheid",
author = "Robert Mattes and Herman Thiel",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/jod.1998.0010",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "95--110",
journal = "Journal of Democracy",
issn = "1054-5736",
number = "1",

}

Consolidation and public opinion in South Africa. / Mattes, Robert; Thiel, Herman.

In: Journal of Democracy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 95-110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consolidation and public opinion in South Africa

AU - Mattes, Robert

AU - Thiel, Herman

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - As recently as January 1990, almost all observers would have agreed that the odds were stacked heavily against a successful transition to democracy in South Africa. In the aftermath of the “miracle election” of April 1994, however, the odds might appear, at first glance, to favor a successful consolidation of South African democracy. For the overwhelming majority of South Africa’s citizens, long deprived of self-government and common citizenship on the basis of race, a return to the old regime of apartheid obviously is not an option. Democracy, rather than vengeance or group power, has long been a cherished goal for black South Africans and was the mantra of the African National Congress (ANC) and the bulk of those involved in the grassroots struggle against apartheid. Moreover, while white South Africans benefited from apartheid, they have had long experience with competitive elections and Westminster-style parliamentary politics, albeit based on exclusionary and racially defined citizenship.

AB - As recently as January 1990, almost all observers would have agreed that the odds were stacked heavily against a successful transition to democracy in South Africa. In the aftermath of the “miracle election” of April 1994, however, the odds might appear, at first glance, to favor a successful consolidation of South African democracy. For the overwhelming majority of South Africa’s citizens, long deprived of self-government and common citizenship on the basis of race, a return to the old regime of apartheid obviously is not an option. Democracy, rather than vengeance or group power, has long been a cherished goal for black South Africans and was the mantra of the African National Congress (ANC) and the bulk of those involved in the grassroots struggle against apartheid. Moreover, while white South Africans benefited from apartheid, they have had long experience with competitive elections and Westminster-style parliamentary politics, albeit based on exclusionary and racially defined citizenship.

KW - South Africa

KW - African National Congress (ANC)

KW - apartheid

U2 - 10.1353/jod.1998.0010

DO - 10.1353/jod.1998.0010

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 95

EP - 110

JO - Journal of Democracy

JF - Journal of Democracy

SN - 1054-5736

IS - 1

ER -