Considering 'best practice': the social construction of teacher-activity and pupil-learning as performance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the 1997 election of the Labour Party to political power in the UK the foci for educational change have been widespread. One area that has received particularly intense scrutiny is that of teacher activity. In particular, the profession has seen a marked rise in the identification of ‘best practice’. As a term ‘best practice’ has entered the parlance of English educational policy to describe that which seemingly has ‘official’ approval. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to consider how increases in pupil attainment on national tests are currently used to demonstrate better pupil learning. Specifically, it identifies that the use of such data to describe the plausibility, veracity and legitimacy of teaching before the test as ‘best practice’ is questionable. In so doing, the critique argues that ‘best practice’ confers and retains legitimacy due to its self‐perpetuation within the discourse of performance. The paper concludes by offering three areas for further research and debate.
LanguageEnglish
Pages375-392
Number of pages17
JournalCambridge Journal of Education
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

social construction
best practice
pupil
teacher
learning
performance
legitimacy
Labour Party
political power
educational policy
election
profession
discourse
Teaching

Keywords

  • best practice
  • social construction
  • teacher activity
  • pupil learning
  • performance

Cite this

@article{777ac4948872414a9c9f6831773a2a38,
title = "Considering 'best practice': the social construction of teacher-activity and pupil-learning as performance",
abstract = "Since the 1997 election of the Labour Party to political power in the UK the foci for educational change have been widespread. One area that has received particularly intense scrutiny is that of teacher activity. In particular, the profession has seen a marked rise in the identification of ‘best practice’. As a term ‘best practice’ has entered the parlance of English educational policy to describe that which seemingly has ‘official’ approval. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to consider how increases in pupil attainment on national tests are currently used to demonstrate better pupil learning. Specifically, it identifies that the use of such data to describe the plausibility, veracity and legitimacy of teaching before the test as ‘best practice’ is questionable. In so doing, the critique argues that ‘best practice’ confers and retains legitimacy due to its self‐perpetuation within the discourse of performance. The paper concludes by offering three areas for further research and debate.",
keywords = "best practice, social construction, teacher activity, pupil learning, performance",
author = "Paul Adams",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/03057640802299635",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "375--392",
journal = "Cambridge Journal of Education",
issn = "0305-764X",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Considering 'best practice'

T2 - Cambridge Journal of Education

AU - Adams, Paul

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Since the 1997 election of the Labour Party to political power in the UK the foci for educational change have been widespread. One area that has received particularly intense scrutiny is that of teacher activity. In particular, the profession has seen a marked rise in the identification of ‘best practice’. As a term ‘best practice’ has entered the parlance of English educational policy to describe that which seemingly has ‘official’ approval. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to consider how increases in pupil attainment on national tests are currently used to demonstrate better pupil learning. Specifically, it identifies that the use of such data to describe the plausibility, veracity and legitimacy of teaching before the test as ‘best practice’ is questionable. In so doing, the critique argues that ‘best practice’ confers and retains legitimacy due to its self‐perpetuation within the discourse of performance. The paper concludes by offering three areas for further research and debate.

AB - Since the 1997 election of the Labour Party to political power in the UK the foci for educational change have been widespread. One area that has received particularly intense scrutiny is that of teacher activity. In particular, the profession has seen a marked rise in the identification of ‘best practice’. As a term ‘best practice’ has entered the parlance of English educational policy to describe that which seemingly has ‘official’ approval. This paper uses a social constructionist perspective to consider how increases in pupil attainment on national tests are currently used to demonstrate better pupil learning. Specifically, it identifies that the use of such data to describe the plausibility, veracity and legitimacy of teaching before the test as ‘best practice’ is questionable. In so doing, the critique argues that ‘best practice’ confers and retains legitimacy due to its self‐perpetuation within the discourse of performance. The paper concludes by offering three areas for further research and debate.

KW - best practice

KW - social construction

KW - teacher activity

KW - pupil learning

KW - performance

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03057640802299635

U2 - 10.1080/03057640802299635

DO - 10.1080/03057640802299635

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 375

EP - 392

JO - Cambridge Journal of Education

JF - Cambridge Journal of Education

SN - 0305-764X

IS - 3

ER -