Consideration of compound drivers and impacts in the disaster risk reduction cycle

Bart J.J.M. van den Hurk, Christopher J. White, Alexandre M. Ramos, Philip J. Ward, Olivia Martius, Indiana Olbert, Kathryn Roscoe, Henrique M.D. Goulart, Jakob Zscheischler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Consideration of compound drivers and impacts are often missing from applications within the Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) cycle, leading to poorer understanding of risk and benefits of actions. The need to include compound considerations is known, but lack of guidance is prohibiting practitioners from including these considerations. This article makes a step toward practitioner guidance by providing examples where consideration of compound drivers, hazards, and impacts may affect different application domains within disaster risk management. We discern five DRR categories and provide illustrative examples of studies that highlight the role of “compound thinking” in early warning, emergency response, infrastructure management, long-term planning, and capacity building. We conclude with a number of common elements that may contribute to the development of practical guidelines to develop appropriate applications for risk management.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106030
Number of pages21
JournaliScience
Volume26
Issue number3
Early online date25 Jan 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2023

Keywords

  • early warning system
  • disaster response
  • recovery
  • disaster risk reduction cycle
  • compound drivers
  • impacts
  • practitioner guidance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consideration of compound drivers and impacts in the disaster risk reduction cycle'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this