Conservatives and the idea of Union

James Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The process of nation-building depends upon the nature of the state which
has been established. The union of Scotland and England created a union
rather than a unitary state, one which permitted some degr ee of
distinctiveness to its components, and consequently the nature of nationbuilding has reflected these origins. During the twentieth century, the
Conservatives were the party of the union state. However, under Mrs
Thatcher a shift occurred in the party's understanding of the nature of the
union. This was reflected in its responses to Scottish demands. The
literature on 'Thatcherism' helps us to understand the changes but alerts us
to the variety of different explanations that exist under that heading. In some
respects, since John Major became party leader there has been a reassertion
of the traditional Conservative position but the Thatcherite legacy remains
evident. This discussion of the changing interpretation of the union and
responses to Scottish demands in Conservative thinking contributes to our
understanding of the process of nation-building, debates on responses to
regional assertion and the nature of Thatcherism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)30-44
Number of pages15
JournalRegional and Federal Studies
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

state building
state formation
twentieth century
leader
interpretation
demand

Keywords

  • British Union
  • thatcherism
  • conservative party
  • Scottish independence

Cite this

Mitchell, James. / Conservatives and the idea of Union. In: Regional and Federal Studies. 1996 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 30-44.
@article{86edae445eb74f058dcb15abbc6ced0d,
title = "Conservatives and the idea of Union",
abstract = "The process of nation-building depends upon the nature of the state whichhas been established. The union of Scotland and England created a unionrather than a unitary state, one which permitted some degr ee ofdistinctiveness to its components, and consequently the nature of nationbuilding has reflected these origins. During the twentieth century, theConservatives were the party of the union state. However, under MrsThatcher a shift occurred in the party's understanding of the nature of theunion. This was reflected in its responses to Scottish demands. Theliterature on 'Thatcherism' helps us to understand the changes but alerts usto the variety of different explanations that exist under that heading. In somerespects, since John Major became party leader there has been a reassertionof the traditional Conservative position but the Thatcherite legacy remainsevident. This discussion of the changing interpretation of the union andresponses to Scottish demands in Conservative thinking contributes to ourunderstanding of the process of nation-building, debates on responses toregional assertion and the nature of Thatcherism.",
keywords = "British Union, thatcherism, conservative party, Scottish independence",
author = "James Mitchell",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1080/13597569608420952",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "30--44",
journal = "Regional and Federal Studies",
issn = "1359-7566",
number = "1",

}

Conservatives and the idea of Union. / Mitchell, James.

In: Regional and Federal Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1996, p. 30-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conservatives and the idea of Union

AU - Mitchell, James

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The process of nation-building depends upon the nature of the state whichhas been established. The union of Scotland and England created a unionrather than a unitary state, one which permitted some degr ee ofdistinctiveness to its components, and consequently the nature of nationbuilding has reflected these origins. During the twentieth century, theConservatives were the party of the union state. However, under MrsThatcher a shift occurred in the party's understanding of the nature of theunion. This was reflected in its responses to Scottish demands. Theliterature on 'Thatcherism' helps us to understand the changes but alerts usto the variety of different explanations that exist under that heading. In somerespects, since John Major became party leader there has been a reassertionof the traditional Conservative position but the Thatcherite legacy remainsevident. This discussion of the changing interpretation of the union andresponses to Scottish demands in Conservative thinking contributes to ourunderstanding of the process of nation-building, debates on responses toregional assertion and the nature of Thatcherism.

AB - The process of nation-building depends upon the nature of the state whichhas been established. The union of Scotland and England created a unionrather than a unitary state, one which permitted some degr ee ofdistinctiveness to its components, and consequently the nature of nationbuilding has reflected these origins. During the twentieth century, theConservatives were the party of the union state. However, under MrsThatcher a shift occurred in the party's understanding of the nature of theunion. This was reflected in its responses to Scottish demands. Theliterature on 'Thatcherism' helps us to understand the changes but alerts usto the variety of different explanations that exist under that heading. In somerespects, since John Major became party leader there has been a reassertionof the traditional Conservative position but the Thatcherite legacy remainsevident. This discussion of the changing interpretation of the union andresponses to Scottish demands in Conservative thinking contributes to ourunderstanding of the process of nation-building, debates on responses toregional assertion and the nature of Thatcherism.

KW - British Union

KW - thatcherism

KW - conservative party

KW - Scottish independence

U2 - 10.1080/13597569608420952

DO - 10.1080/13597569608420952

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 30

EP - 44

JO - Regional and Federal Studies

JF - Regional and Federal Studies

SN - 1359-7566

IS - 1

ER -